IMPORTANCE To our knowledge, longitudinal assessment of depression, anxiety, and decision regret (a sense of disappointment or dissatisfaction in the decision) in patients undergoing prognostication for uveal melanoma does not exist. OBJECTIVE To report on depression, anxiety, and decision regret before and after testing to estimate uveal melanoma prognosis. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Prospective interventional case series conducted at an institutional referral practice of 96 patients with clinical diagnosis of uveal melanoma who underwent prognostication at the time of primary therapy.MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Depression, anxiety, and decision regret prior to prognostication (baseline) and at 3 and 12 months afterwards. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and Decision Regret Scale were self-administered by the patients prior to prognostication (baseline) and at 3 and 12 months afterwards. Data were summarized using means and standard deviations for continuous measures, frequencies, and percentages for categorical factors. A mixed model was used to assess the trajectory of HADS anxiety and the associations between HADS anxiety and baseline HADS depression, baseline decision regret, prognostication test result, and adjuvant therapy, respectively, while adjusting for age and sex. RESULTS Ninety-six patients (median age 60.7 years) completed baseline questionnaires. The mean (SD) HADS anxiety score at baseline (7.4 [4.0]) was higher than at 3 months (5.4 [3.7]; P < .001) or 12 months (4.7 [3.4]; P < .001), and decreased with older age (coefficient estimate [SD], −0.06 [0.02]; P < .001). The decision regret score was associated with baseline HADS depression score (coefficient estimate [SE], −1.17 [0.43]; P < .007), and HADS depression score increased with baseline HADS anxiety score (coefficient estimate [SE], 0.39 [0.06]; P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCEOur study raises questions about decision regret in patients who agree to have a prognostic test that may not help guide treatment. Although decision regret appears to lessen or dissipate with time, study on larger numbers of patients is necessary to elucidate factors that may be addressed to mitigate decision regret.
This study examined concerns regarding menopause among women with schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder (N = 30), women with bipolar disorder (N = 25), and women with major depression (N = 36). The three groups were compared regarding knowledge of menopause, expectations of effect of menopause, and menopause-related quality of life. All women had deficits in fund of knowledge regarding menopause. More than half (53.8%) agreed that they felt more stressed due to menopause or approaching menopause, and 51.6% felt that menopause has had a negative effect on their emotional state. Perceptions of menopause effect on emotional states between the three groups were similar. The top five symptoms experienced by women with serious mental illness were all problems related to psychological issues: feeling depressed (88%, N = 80), feeling anxious (88%, N = 80), feeling tired or worn out (87%, N = 79), feeling a lack of energy (86%, N = 78), and experiencing poor memory (84%, N = 76). Larger-scale studies evaluating the effects of menopause on serious mental illness are needed to clarify how menopause affects illness outcomes in women with serious mental illness.
This preliminary study indicates that psychiatrists and other physicians should consider the frequency and overlap of menopausal and psychiatric symptoms among women with serious mental illness in this age group.
Some patients have behaviors that make interactions unpleasant, sometimes contributing to suboptimal outcomes and physician burnout. Understanding common difficult personality types can help doctors plan effective strategies for dealing with each, resulting in more effective communication, less stress, and better health outcomes.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.