The Drosophila adult cuticle displays a stereotyped pattern of sensory organs (SOs). Its deployment requires the expression of the achaete (ac) and scute (sc) genes. Their products confer to cells of epidermal primordia (imaginal discs and histoblasts) the ability to become SO precursors (SOPs). In imaginal discs, ac and sc expression is spatially restricted to cell clusters within which one or a few cells become SOP(s). With the help of ubiquitous sc expression provided at different developmental times by a heat shock‐sc (HSSC) chimeric gene, we have analyzed the response of epidermal primordia to the proneural action of the sc product, and have tested whether the patterned distribution of ac/sc products is necessary to position SOs correctly within the epidermis. Each primordium responds to HSSC expression by developing SOs only during a characteristic developmental period. In the absence of the endogenous ac and sc genes, most SOs induced by HSSC are of the correct type and are located in wild type positions. These results indicate that the capacity of primordia to respond to sc is temporally and spatially regulated, that specification of the type of SO does not depend on ac/sc, and that SO positioning utilizes topological information independent of the spatially restricted distribution of ac/sc products.

The pattern of bristles and other sensory organs on the adult cuticle of Drosophila is prefigured in the imaginal discs by the pattern of expression of the proneural achaete (ac) and scute (sc) genes, two members of the ac-sc complex (AS-C). These genes are simultaneously expressed by groups of cells (the proneural clusters) located at constant positions in discs. Their products {transcription factors of the basic-helix-loop-helix family) allow cells to become sensory organ mother cells (SMCs), a fate normally realized by only one or a few cells per cluster. Here we show that the highly complex pattern of proneural clusters is constructed piecemeal, by the action on ac and sc of site-specific, enhancer-like elements distributed along most of the AS-C (-90 kb). Fragments of AS-C DNA containing these enhancers drive reporter lacZ genes in only one or a few proneural clusters. This expression is independent of the ac and sc endogenous genes, indicating that the enhancers respond to local combinations of factors (prepattern). We show further that the cross-activation between ac and sc, discovered by means of transgenes containing either ac or sc promoter fragments linked to lacZ and thought to explain the almost identical patterns of ac and sc expression, does not occur detectably between the endogenous ac and sc genes in most proneural clusters. Our data indicate that coexpression is accomplished by activation of both ac and sc by the same set of position-specific enhancers.

In Drosophila, each segmental primordium is subdivided into two cell populations, the anterior (A) and posterior (P) compartments by the selective activity of the transcription factor Engrailed (En) in P cells. Under En control, P cells secrete, but cannot respond to, the signalling protein Hedgehog (Hh). In contrast, and by default, A cells are programmed to respond to Hh by expressing other signalling molecules, such as Decapentaplegic (Dpp) and Wingless (Wg), which organize growth and patterning in both compartments. Cells of the A and P compartments do not intermix, apparently as a consequence of their having distinct cell affinities that cause them to maximize contact with cells of the same compartment, while minimizing contact with cells from the other compartment. This failure to mix has previously been ascribed to an autonomous and direct role for En in specifying a P, as opposed to an A, cell affinity. However, an alternative hypothesis is that Hh secreted by P cells induces A cells to acquire a distinct cell affinity, ensuring that a stable 'affinity boundary' forms wherever P and A cells meet. Here we show that the affinity boundary that segregates A and P cells into adjacent but immiscible cell populations is to a large extent a consequence of local Hh signalling, rather than a reflection of an intrinsic affinity difference between A and P cells.