Desmoid-type fibromatosis is a sarcoma subtype that gathers some singular characteristics, making it a difficult challenge to face in clinical practice. Despite its excellent survival prognosis, these tumors may be unpredictable, ranging from an asymptomatic indolent course to persistent, local, and extended recurrences that significantly impair quality of life. Although surgery was initially considered the first elective treatment, collected published data during the past few years are now pointing to the "wait and see" approach as a reasonable initial strategy because many patients can live a long life with the disease without having symptoms. When symptoms appear or there is a risk of functional impairment, a wide spectrum of therapies (local and systemic) can be useful in improving symptoms and controlling the disease. Because of the low incidence of desmoid-type fibromatosis, there is scarce scientific evidence supporting any specific treatment. Nonetheless, if volumetric responses are needed, chemotherapy may be a reasonable early option. However, if long-term control of disease is desirable, hormonal therapy, NSAIDs, and TKIs are the likely treatments of choice. Recent new findings in the biologic development of these tumors, such as the role of Wnt/β-catenin dependent pathway, have shown that the prognostic information provided by specific CTNNB1 gene mutations and other genetic profiles can lead to better methods of selecting patients as candidates for other approaches. Based on recent research, the Notch pathway inhibition in DF is one of the most promising potential targets to explore. As an orphan disease, it is mandatory that as many patients as possible be included in clinical trials.

WPC activity was confirmed as a useful therapy on real-life unselected RM-SCCHN patients, with similar benefit to that obtained in the phase II study, and comparable to platinum and cetuximab based treatment, confirming its value in unfit patients. In addition to treatment response, a change in serum magnesium values during treatment was proved as independent PF on OS.

No abstract

11070 Background: The GMI is a marker of drug activity and represents an intra-patient comparison of successive time to progression (TTP), defined as the TTP ratio between the second (or later) line (TTPn) of therapy divided by the prior line (TTPn−1). Defining a clinical profile of pts with GMI >1.33 could help to identify pts who can gain greater benefit from T. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated the concordance between the GMI and the efficacy outcomes and clinical profiles of 198 pts with ASTS treated with trabectedin 1.5 mg/m² (24-h infusion q3w) as a 2nd or further-line treatment from Jan 2007 to Jun 2016. Results: After a median follow-up of 58 months (m; range: 18-172) median overall survival from ASTS diagnosis (MOS) and from T (MT-OS) were 27.5 m (23-32.1) and 10.8 m (8.9-12.7), respectively, while median TTP from T (MT-TTP) and T-1 were 3.4 m (2.8-4) and 3.5 m (2.8-4.2). Overall, 106 pts (53%) had a GMI <1; 22 (11%) a GMI=1-1.33 and 70 pts (35%) a GMI >1.33. A high GMI (<1.33 vs >1.33) correlated with favorable efficacy outcomes: MT-OS: 23 vs 36 m (p<0.001), MT-TTP 2.3 vs 8.2 m (p<0.001) and clinical benefit (objective response + stable disease) 23% vs 68% (p=0.001). The multivariate analysis identified L-type sarcoma (Odds ratio: 1.99, 95% CI 1.06-3.71), metastatic free interval (MFI) from initial diagnosis > 8.1 m (2.24, 95%CI 1.19-4.18) and Karnofsky >80 (2.3, 95%CI 1.00-5.28) as factors independently associated to GMI> 1.33. Based on these 3 variables we defined a new GEISTRA score assigning 1 point for each adversely affected variable: non L-Sarcoma, MFI<8.1m or Karnofsky <80. This score showed a strong correlation with MT-TTP (p<0.001) and MT-OS (p<0.001). Conclusions: Based on the high GMI we defined a new GEISTRA score, which is strongly associated with favorable efficacy outcomes in pts with ASTS treated with T. Thus, GEISTRA score could be a potentially useful predictable clinical tool for T benefit. [Table: see text]

Abstract. Carcinomas of unknown primary origin account for 3-5% of all malignancies. The current literature suggests that metastatic dissemination is able to occur in the absence of primary tumor growth. In metastatic disease that is difficult to diagnose, the origin usually remains unknown even after an exhaustive evaluation of immunohistochemistry (IHC) markers. In the current study, a 49-year-old male presented with lymph nodes metastases of unknown origin. The excisional biopsy of an inguinal node revealed an adenocarcinoma growth pattern, but the IHC could not determine the primary origin. A gene profiling test was performed to complete the diagnosis and a salivary gland adenocarcinoma was diagnosed with 90% probability. Subsequently, the patient underwent appropriate chemotherapy for salivary gland adenocarcinoma, and exhibited an improved partial response. The present case study highlights the importance of an accurate diagnosis of the primary tumor and the use of all the current tools available in order to provide patients with the best treatment possible.