This is the largest reported series of CDH1 mutation carriers, providing more precise estimates of age-associated risks of gastric and breast cancer that will improve counseling of unaffected carriers. In HDGC families lacking CDH1 mutations, testing of CTNNA1 and other tumor suppressor genes should be considered. Clinically defined HDGC families can harbor mutations in genes (ie, BRCA2) with different clinical ramifications from CDH1. Therefore, we propose that HDGC syndrome may be best defined by mutations in CDH1 and closely related genes, rather than through clinical criteria that capture families with heterogeneous susceptibility profiles.

Although small, this series demonstrates that a high level of suspicion is needed to diagnose the HP syndrome, in which serrated adenomas seem to be the hallmark. Although an elevated percentage of CRC was observed in this series of symptomatic patients with HP, prospective studies in asymptomatic individuals are needed to clearly quantify the risk of CRC in patients with HP. Because familial aggregation of HP was present in 3/12 (25%) of kindreds, screening colonoscopy should be offered to first-degree relatives.

It is unclear whether the mutation spectra in WNT genes vary among distinct types of colorectal tumors. We have analyzed mutations in specific WNT genes in a cohort of 52 colorectal tumors and performed a meta-analysis of previous studies. Notably, significant differences were found among the mutation spectra. We have previously shown that in familial adenomatous polyposis, APC somatic mutations are selected to provide the "just-right" level of WNT signaling for tumor formation. Here, we found that APC mutations encompassing at least two beta-catenin down-regulating motifs (20 a.a. repeats) are significantly more frequent in microsatellite unstable (MSI-H) than in microsatellite stable (MSS) tumors where truncations retaining less than two repeats are more frequent (P = 0.0009). Moreover, in cases where both APC hits are detected, selection for mutations retaining a cumulative number of two 20 a.a. repeats became apparent in MSI-H tumors (P = 0.001). This type of mutations were also more frequent in proximal versus distal colonic tumors, regardless of MSI status (P = 0.0008). Among MSI-H tumors, CTNNB1 mutations were significantly more frequent in HNPCC than in sporadic lesions (28% versus 6%, P < 10-6) and were preferentially detected in the proximal colon, independently of MSI status (P = 0.017). In conclusion, the observed spectra of WNT gene mutations in colorectal tumors are likely the result from selection of specific levels of beta-catenin signaling, optimal for tumor formation in the context of specific anatomical locations and forms of genetic instability. We suggest that this may underlie the preferential location of MMR deficient tumors in the proximal colon.

There are two well-defined pathways for colorectal carcinogenesis, the suppressor and the mutator pathways. The latter is characteristic of hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC), but can also be found in a subset of sporadic colorectal cancer (SCC) possessing distinctive clinical and pathological features, namely early age of onset, location in the right colon, poor differentiation, and a predominant mucinous component. This mutator pathway results from inactivation of mismatch repair (MMR) genes, namely MSH2 and MLH1. The aim of this study was to ascertain if abnormal MMR protein gene expression is a good indicator for identifying tumours from the mutator pathway. Seventy-six cases of SCC were studied by immunohistochemistry using two monoclonal mouse antibodies that react against MSH2 and MLH1 protein gene products. Immunoexpression was assessed both in tumour and in non-neoplastic, adjacent and distant mucosa. Microsatellite instability (MSI) was detected by evaluating the length of poly(CA) repeated sequences at seven loci, or by the detection of small unstable alleles in a poly(A) repeat - BAT-26. Except for BAT-26, in which only tumour DNA was used, MSI analysis was performed in both tumour and normal mucosal DNA. MSI was classified as high (MSI-H), low (MSI-L) or stable (MSS). Abnormal protein expression was found in 9/76 (12%) tumours. Immunohistochemistry for hmlh1 and hmsh2 detected 75% of MSI-H. There was also a highly significant correlation between the observed immunoexpression and several clinical and pathological characteristics described as the phenotypic profile of the mutator pathway, such as right-sided location (p=0.003), mucin production (p=0.008), and a peritumoural lymphoid infiltrate (p=0.009). Non-neoplastic adjacent mucosa showed normal hMSH2 expression in all cases, but in ten cases there was no hMLH1 expression in this transitional mucosa, which is known to display an alterated mucin pattern and a high proliferative rate. These results demonstrated a good correlation between hMLH1 and hMSH2 gene immunoexpression and the clinico-pathological features characteristic of the mutator phenotype and support the use of this method as a rapid and efficient way to detect tumours arising from this pathway.

Patients presenting familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), attenuated familial adenomatous polyposis (AFAP) or multiple colorectal adenomas (MCRAs) phenotype are clinically difficult to distinguish. We aimed to genetically characterize 107 clinically well-characterized patients with FAP-like phenotype, and stratified according to the recent guidelines for the clinical management of FAP: FAP, AFAP, MCRA (10-99 colorectal adenomas) without family history of colorectal cancer or few adenomas (FH), MCRA (10-99) with FH, MCRA (3-9) with FH. Overall, APC or MUTYH mutations were detected in 42/48 (88%), 14/20 (70%) and 10/38 (26%) of FAP, AFAP and MCRA patients, respectively. APC and MUTYH mutations accounted for 81% and 7% of FAP patients and for 30% and 40% of AFAP patients, respectively. Notably, MCRA patients did not present APC mutations. In 26% of these patients, an MUTYH mutation was identified and the detection rate increased with the number of adenomas, irrespectively of family history, being significantly higher in MCRA patients presenting more than 30 adenomas [7/12 (58%) vs 2/14 (14%), p = 0.023]. We validate the recently proposed guidelines in our patient's cohort and show that APC or MUTYH germline defects are responsible for the majority of clinically well-characterized patients with FAP and AFAP phenotype, and patients with more than 30 colorectal adenomas. The different mutation frequencies according to family history and to the number of adenomas underscore the importance of an adequate familial characterization, both clinically and by colonoscopy, in the management of FAP-like phenotypes. The phenotypes of the mutation-negative patients suggest distinct etiologies in these cases.

In a fraction of families fulfilling the Amsterdam criteria for hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer, colorectal cancers are microsatellite stable and DNA mismatch repair gene (MMR) mutations are not found. These families were designated as familial colorectal cancer type X (FCCTX). We aimed to characterise a group of FCCTX families defined by the Amsterdam criteria and MSS tumours at clinical and molecular level. Twenty-four tumours from 15 FCCTX families were analysed for loss of known tumour suppressor gene (TSG) loci (APC, TP53, SMAD4 and DCC), MGMT and MMR genes promoter methylation, and also APC and KRAS somatic mutations. FCCTX families presented specific clinical features: absence of endometrial tumours, high adenoma/carcinoma ratio (1.91) and prevalence of rectal cancers (13/27, 48%). New molecular features were found: the majority of FCCTX tumours (13/18; 72%) presented TSG loss. TSG loss positive tumours presented frequent APC and KRAS somatic mutations and MGMT methylation [10/13 (77%), 7/13 (54%) and 6/11 (54%), respectively]. In TSG loss negative tumours (5/18; 28%), the same molecular events were found in 2/5 (40%), 2/5 (40%) and 1/3 (33%) tumours, respectively. Transition mutations in KRAS were more frequent among MGMT methylated tumours than in unmethylated [5/8 (63%) vs. 1/10 (10%), P = 0.03]. Although sharing similar clinical features, at least two different molecular entities should exist among FCCTX families, one whose tumours present frequent TSG loss, APC and KRAS somatic mutations, and MGMT promoter methylation, and a second, lesser predominant, with no evidence of TSG loss and rarely presenting promoter methylation.

Microsatellite instability (MSI) is present in most colorectal cancers (CRC) associated with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC). MSI testing in so‐called sporadic forms of CRC may become a useful tool in identifying new HNPCC kindred. The aim of this study was to analyse the utility of BAT‐26 as a marker to identify CRCs with MSI and to investigate whether sporadic CRCs with MSI have a phenotypic expression similar to HNPCC cases. MSI was detected using two methods, an association of 7 poly(CA) repeats and a poly(A) repeat alone, BAT‐26, in a series of 62 patients with apparently sporadic forms of CRC. Germ‐line and somatic mutations in the hMSH2, hMLH1, and hMSH6 genes were analysed in patients with MSI+ tumours. Patients with MSI+ at poly(CA) loci and at BAT‐26 were younger (p = 0·024 and p = 0·002), had tumours more frequently right sided (p = 0·017 and p = 0·0001) and more often mucinous (p = 0·037 and p = 0·005, respectively) than patients with MSI negative tumours. Mutation analysis allowed the identification of two patients carrying germ‐line mutations in the hMLH1 gene (both were BAT‐26+) and two other patients who had somatic mutation in the hMSH2 and in hMLH1 genes. In conclusion, the detection of MSI using poly(CA) repeats or BAT‐26 alone allowed the identification of a subset of patients with clinico‐pathological characteristics similar to those associated to HNPCC. BAT‐26 has the advantage of being a simple and less expensive method that might be used as a screening procedure before mutation analysis. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Background and objective: Little is known about the clinical impact of double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE) in patients with PeutzJeghers syndrome (PJS).The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of DBE in the management of small-bowel polyps in PJS patients.Patients and methods: We conducted a multicentre, retrospective cohort study, which included all consecutive patients diagnosed with PJS who underwent DBE for polypectomy between January 2006 and August 2012. In all cases, previous videocapsule enteroscopy had shown at least one polyp ≥ 10 mm in size.Results: Twenty-five patients (13 men; median age 36 years; 14 with prior laparotomy) underwent 46 DBE procedures (1 to 5 per patient, 44 via oral route). Polypectomy was performed in 39/46 DBEs. A total of 214 polyps were removed (median-size 30 mm), with a median number of polypectomies per procedure of 5.0 (range 1-18). The estimated maximum-sizes of resected polyps significantly decreased at each session: 30.0, 25.0, 20.0, 15.0, and 17.5 mm (p = 0.02). In 7 DBEs no polypectomy was performed (4-only minor polyps detected; 3-endoscopic irresecability). Complications occurred in 3/39 of therapeutic procedures (2-minor delayed bleeding; 1-mucosal tear), all of them dealt with conservative or endoscopic therapy. Six patients underwent elective surgery post DBE due to polyps not amenable for endoscopic resection. There were no small-bowel polyp related complications during a median follow-up of 56.5 months.Conclusion: DBE showed to be a safe and effective technique in the management of small-bowel polyps in PJS patients, allowing a presymptomatic and non-surgical approach.