Choosing the right nutrients to consume is essential to health and wellbeing across species. However, the factors that influence these decisions are poorly understood. This is particularly true for dietary proteins, which are important determinants of lifespan and reproduction. We show that in Drosophila melanogaster, essential amino acids (eAAs) and the concerted action of the commensal bacteria Acetobacter pomorum and Lactobacilli are critical modulators of food choice. Using a chemically defined diet, we show that the absence of any single eAA from the diet is sufficient to elicit specific appetites for amino acid (AA)-rich food. Furthermore, commensal bacteria buffer the animal from the lack of dietary eAAs: both increased yeast appetite and decreased reproduction induced by eAA deprivation are rescued by the presence of commensals. Surprisingly, these effects do not seem to be due to changes in AA titers, suggesting that gut bacteria act through a different mechanism to change behavior and reproduction. Thus, eAAs and commensal bacteria are potent modulators of feeding decisions and reproductive output. This demonstrates how the interaction of specific nutrients with the microbiome can shape behavioral decisions and life history traits.

To optimize fitness, animals must dynamically match food choices to their current needs. For drosophilids, yeast fulfills most dietary protein and micronutrient requirements. While several yeast metabolites activate known gustatory receptor neurons (GRNs) in Drosophila melanogaster, the chemosensory channels mediating yeast feeding remain unknown. Here we identify a class of proboscis GRNs required for yeast intake. Within this class, taste peg GRNs are specifically required to sustain yeast feeding. Sensillar GRNs, however, mediate feeding initiation. Furthermore, the response of yeast GRNs, but not sweet GRNs, is enhanced following deprivation from amino acids, providing a potential basis for protein-specific appetite. Although nutritional and reproductive states synergistically increase yeast appetite, reproductive state acts independently of nutritional state, modulating processing downstream of GRNs. Together, these results suggest that different internal states act at distinct levels of a dedicated gustatory circuit to elicit nutrient-specific appetites towards a complex, ecologically relevant protein source.

The impact of commensal bacteria on the host arises from complex microbial-diet-host interactions. Mapping metabolic interactions in gut microbial communities is therefore key to understand how the microbiome influences the host. Here we use an interdisciplinary approach including isotope-resolved metabolomics to show that in Drosophila melanogaster, Acetobacter pomorum (Ap) and Lactobacillus plantarum (Lp) a syntrophic relationship is established to overcome detrimental host diets and identify Ap as the bacterium altering the host's feeding decisions. Specifically, we show that Ap uses the lactate produced by Lp to supply amino acids that are essential to Lp, allowing it to grow in imbalanced diets. Lactate is also necessary and sufficient for Ap to alter the fly's protein appetite. Our data show that gut bacterial communities use metabolic interactions to become resilient to detrimental host diets. These interactions also ensure the constant flow of metabolites used by the microbiome to alter reproduction and host behaviour.

It is unclear whether the mutation spectra in WNT genes vary among distinct types of colorectal tumors. We have analyzed mutations in specific WNT genes in a cohort of 52 colorectal tumors and performed a meta-analysis of previous studies. Notably, significant differences were found among the mutation spectra. We have previously shown that in familial adenomatous polyposis, APC somatic mutations are selected to provide the "just-right" level of WNT signaling for tumor formation. Here, we found that APC mutations encompassing at least two beta-catenin down-regulating motifs (20 a.a. repeats) are significantly more frequent in microsatellite unstable (MSI-H) than in microsatellite stable (MSS) tumors where truncations retaining less than two repeats are more frequent (P = 0.0009). Moreover, in cases where both APC hits are detected, selection for mutations retaining a cumulative number of two 20 a.a. repeats became apparent in MSI-H tumors (P = 0.001). This type of mutations were also more frequent in proximal versus distal colonic tumors, regardless of MSI status (P = 0.0008). Among MSI-H tumors, CTNNB1 mutations were significantly more frequent in HNPCC than in sporadic lesions (28% versus 6%, P < 10-6) and were preferentially detected in the proximal colon, independently of MSI status (P = 0.017). In conclusion, the observed spectra of WNT gene mutations in colorectal tumors are likely the result from selection of specific levels of beta-catenin signaling, optimal for tumor formation in the context of specific anatomical locations and forms of genetic instability. We suggest that this may underlie the preferential location of MMR deficient tumors in the proximal colon.

Patients presenting familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), attenuated familial adenomatous polyposis (AFAP) or multiple colorectal adenomas (MCRAs) phenotype are clinically difficult to distinguish. We aimed to genetically characterize 107 clinically well-characterized patients with FAP-like phenotype, and stratified according to the recent guidelines for the clinical management of FAP: FAP, AFAP, MCRA (10-99 colorectal adenomas) without family history of colorectal cancer or few adenomas (FH), MCRA (10-99) with FH, MCRA (3-9) with FH. Overall, APC or MUTYH mutations were detected in 42/48 (88%), 14/20 (70%) and 10/38 (26%) of FAP, AFAP and MCRA patients, respectively. APC and MUTYH mutations accounted for 81% and 7% of FAP patients and for 30% and 40% of AFAP patients, respectively. Notably, MCRA patients did not present APC mutations. In 26% of these patients, an MUTYH mutation was identified and the detection rate increased with the number of adenomas, irrespectively of family history, being significantly higher in MCRA patients presenting more than 30 adenomas [7/12 (58%) vs 2/14 (14%), p = 0.023]. We validate the recently proposed guidelines in our patient's cohort and show that APC or MUTYH germline defects are responsible for the majority of clinically well-characterized patients with FAP and AFAP phenotype, and patients with more than 30 colorectal adenomas. The different mutation frequencies according to family history and to the number of adenomas underscore the importance of an adequate familial characterization, both clinically and by colonoscopy, in the management of FAP-like phenotypes. The phenotypes of the mutation-negative patients suggest distinct etiologies in these cases.

The regulation of feeding plays a key role in determining the fitness of animals through its impact on nutrition. Elucidating the circuit basis of feeding and related behaviors is an important goal in neuroscience. We recently used a system for closed-loop optogenetic manipulation of neurons contingent on the feeding behavior of Drosophila to dissect the impact of a specific subset of taste neurons on yeast feeding. Here, we describe the development and validation of this system, which we term the optoPAD. We use the optoPAD to induce appetitive and aversive effects on feeding by activating or inhibiting gustatory neurons in closed-loop – effectively creating virtual taste realities. The use of optogenetics allowed us to vary the dynamics and probability of stimulation in single flies and assess the impact on feeding behavior quantitatively and with high throughput. These data demonstrate that the optoPAD is a powerful tool to dissect the circuit basis of feeding behavior, allowing the efficient implementation of sophisticated behavioral paradigms to study the mechanistic basis of animals’ adaptation to dynamic environments.

No abstract

To optimize fitness, animals must dynamically match food choices to their current needs. For drosophilids, yeast fulfils most dietary protein and micronutrient requirements. While several yeast metabolites activate known gustatory receptor neurons (GRNs) in Drosophila melanogaster, the chemosensory channels mediating yeast feeding remain unknown. Here we identify a class of proboscis GRNs required for yeast intake, and show that these GRNs act redundantly to mediate yeast feeding. While nutritional and reproductive states synergistically increase yeast appetite, we find a separation of these state signals at the level of GRN responses to yeast: amino acid but not mating state enhances yeast GRN gain. The sensitivity of sweet GRNs to sugar is not increased by protein deprivation, providing a potential basis for protein-specific appetite. The emerging picture is that different internal states act at distinct levels of a dedicated gustatory circuit to elicit nutrient-specific appetites towards a complex, ecologically relevant protein source. INTRODUCTIONDecision-making is a key function of the brain. One of the most ancestral and consequential decisions animals need to make is which foods to eat, since balancing the intake of multiple classes of nutrients is critical to optimizing lifespan and reproduction 1 . To do this, many animals, including humans, develop so-called "specific appetites", seeking out and consuming specific foods in response to a physiological deficit of a particular nutrient [2][3][4][5] . Recently, several populations of central neurons driving consumption of specific nutrients have been identified in different species [6][7][8][9] . How these circuits modulate sensory processing to elicit state-specific behavioral responses, however, is poorly understood. The ability to precisely control the intake of dietary proteins is emerging as a conserved phenomenon across phyla. Insects, for example, tightly regulate their intake of protein depending on their internal states 10,11 . Mosquito disease vectors impose a huge burden on human health due to their need for dietary protein, which drives host-seeking and feeding behaviors only during specific internal states 12,13 . Dietary protein homeostasis is not specific to invertebrates, as humans are also able to select highprotein foods when low on protein 14,15 . Although protein is essential for sustaining key physiological processes such as reproduction, excessive protein intake has detrimental effects on aging and health [16][17][18][19][20] . This emphasizes the importance of this tight control of protein intake. Most Drosophila species, including the model organism Drosophila melanogaster, are highly adapted to consume yeast as the major source of non-caloric nutrients in the wild, including proteins, and thus amino acids (AAs) [21][22][23] , as well as sterols, vitamins etc. 24 . It is therefore essential for flies to precisely regulate the intake of yeast. This is achieved by modulating decision-making at different scales, from exploration to fee...