No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

ObjectiveTo compare the detection rates of prostate cancer (PCa) in men with Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) 3-5 abnormalities on 3-Tesla multiparametric (mp) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using in-bore MRIguided biopsy compared with cognitively directed transperineal (cTP) biopsy and transrectal ultrasonography (cTRUS) biopsy. MethodsThis was a retrospective single-centre study of consecutive men attending the private practice clinic of an experienced urologist performing MRI-guided biopsy and an experienced urologist performing cTP and cTRUS biopsy techniques for PI-RADS 3-5 lesions identified on 3-Tesla mpMRI. ResultsThere were 595 target mpMRI lesions from 482 men with PI-RADS 3-5 regions of interest during 483 episodes of biopsy. The abnormal mpMRI target lesion was biopsied using the MRI-guided method for 298 biopsies, the cTP method for 248 biopsies and the cTRUS method for 49 biopsies. There were no significant differences in PCa detection among the three biopsy methods in PI-RADS 3 (48.9%, 40.0% and 44.4%, respectively), PI-RADS 4 (73.2%, 81.0% and 85.0%, respectively) or PI-RADS 5 (95.2, 92.0% and 95.0%, respectively) lesions, and there was no significant difference in detection of significant PCa among the biopsy methods in PI-RADS 3 (42.2%, 30.0% and 33.3%, respectively), PI-RADS 4 (66.8%, 66.0% and 80.0%, respectively) or PI-RADS 5 (90.5%, 89.8% and 90.0%, respectively) lesions. There were also no differences in PCa or significant PCa detection based on lesion location or size among the methods. ConclusionWe found no significant difference in the ability to detect PCa or significant PCa using targeted MRI-guided, cTP or cTRUS biopsy methods. Identification of an abnormal area on mpMRI appears to be more important in increasing the detection of PCa than the technique used to biopsy an MRI abnormality.

Purpose:There is a paucity of information on the clinical efficacy and safety of the photoselective vaporization (PVP) of the prostate using the 180W lithium triborate (LBO) laser. We report on initial outcomes of PVP with the 180W laser, comparing the first 50 cases with the last 50 cases performed with the 120W LBO laser.Methods:All cases performed by a single surgeon (HHW) have been prospectively maintained. The last 50 cases treated with the 120W LBO laser (December 2009 to August 2010) were compared with the first 50 cases treated with the 180W LBO (July 2010 to June 2011). Patient variables were recorded preoperatively and at 3 months postoperatively. Perioperative data was also recorded.Results:The 180W cases had a larger median transrectal ultrasound prostate volume (68 mL vs. 51 mL, P<0.05). For the 180W and 120W LBO lasers, total operating time was 64.2 and 72.5 minutes (not significant [NS] at P=0.22), lasering time 49.6 and 54.6 minutes (NS, P=0.30) and energy utilisation 477.6 kJ and 377.9 kJ (P<0.05) respectively. When compared per gram of prostate tissue lasered, the 180W is quicker at 0.67 min/g vs. 1.0 min/g for the 120W laser. Complications using the Clavien-Dindo classification included 5 grade 1 complications and 3 grade 3b (bladder neck contractures) with the 180W LBO laser. The 120 W LBO laser had 4 grade 1 complications and 1 grade 2.Conclusions:There is little change in clinical outcomes with the transition from 120W to 180W LBO PVP with an already experienced PVP surgeon. The 180W LBO laser appears to have impacted upon patient selection with significantly increased prostate size and associated with increased energy utilisation. There appears to be a trend toward shorter laser times.

No abstract

Caecal bascule is an unusual type of volvulus that presents a challenging diagnosis for clinicians. We present a case of a forty-two year old female who developed a perforated caecal bascule five days post emergency caesarean section. The diagnosis of caecal bascule was made intraoperatively during a hemicolectomy. Greater awareness of this phenomenon and its clinical and radiological findings is important to avert the development of bowel perforation or gangrene.