Although the β-cells secrete insulin, the liver, with its first-pass insulin extraction (FPE), regulates the amount of insulin allowed into circulation for action on target tissues. The metabolic clearance rate of insulin, of which FPE is the dominant component, is a major determinant of insulin sensitivity (SI). We studied the intricate relationship among FPE, SI, and fasting insulin. We used a direct method of measuring FPE, the paired portal/peripheral infusion protocol, where insulin is infused stepwise through either the portal vein or a peripheral vein in healthy young dogs ( = 12). FPE is calculated as the difference in clearance rates (slope of infusion rate vs. steady insulin plot) between the paired experiments. Significant correlations were found between FPE and clamp-assessed SI ( = 0.74), FPE and fasting insulin ( = -0.64), and SI and fasting insulin ( = -0.67). We also found a wide variance in FPE (22.4-77.2%; mean ± SD 50.4 ± 19.1) that is reflected in the variability of plasma insulin (48.1 ± 30.9 pmol/L) and SI (9.4 ± 5.8 × 10 dL · kg · min · [pmol/L]). FPE could be the nexus of regulation of both plasma insulin and SI.

CB1 receptor (CB1R) antagonism improves the deleterious effects of a high-fat diet (HFD) by reducing body fat mass and adipocyte cell size. Previous studies demonstrated that the beneficial effects of the CB1R antagonist rimonabant (RIM) in white adipose tissue (WAT) are partially due to an increase of mitochondria numbers and upregulation thermogenesis markers, suggesting an induction of WAT beiging. However, the molecular mechanism by which CB1R antagonism induces weight loss and WAT beiging is unclear. In this study, we probed for genes associated with beiging and explored longitudinal molecular mechanisms by which the beiging process occurs. HFD dogs received either RIM (HFD+RIM) or placebo (PL) (HFD+PL) for 16 wk. Several genes involved in beiging were increased in HFD+RIM compared with pre-fat, HFD, and HFD+PL. We evaluated lipolysis and its regulators including natriuretic peptide (NP) and its receptors ( NPRs), β-1 and β-3 adrenergic receptor ( β1R, β3R) genes. These genes were increased in WAT depots, accompanied by an increase in lipolysis in HFD+RIM. In addition, RIM decreased markers of inflammation and increased adiponectin receptors in WAT. We observed a small but significant increase in UCP1; therefore, we evaluated the newly discovered UCP1-independent thermogenesis pathway. We confirmed that SERCA2b and RYR2, the two key genes involved in this pathway, were upregulated in the WAT. Our data suggest that the upregulation of NPRs, β-1R and β-3R, lipolysis, and SERCA2b and RYR2 may be one of the mechanisms by which RIM promotes beiging and overall the improvement of metabolic homeostasis induced by RIM.

Hyperinsulinemia, accompanied by reduced first-pass hepatic insulin extraction (FPE) and increased secretion, is a primary response to insulin resistance. Different in vivo methods are used to estimate the clearance of insulin, which is assumed to reflect FPE. We compared two methodologically different but commonly used indirect estimates with directly measured FPE in healthy dogs ( n = 9). The indirect methods were 1) metabolic clearance rate of insulin (MCR) during the hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp (EGC), a steady-state method, and 2) fractional clearance rate of insulin (FCR) during the frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test (FSIGT), a dynamic method. MCR was calculated as the ratio of insulin infusion rate to steady-state plasma insulin. FCR was calculated as the exponential decay rate constant of the injected insulin. Directly measured FPE is based on the difference in insulin measurements during intraportal vs. peripheral vein insulin infusions. We found a strong correlation between indirect FCR (min) and FPE (%). In contrast, we observed a poor association between MCR (ml·min·kg) and FPE (%). Our findings in canines suggest that FCR measured during FSIGT can be used to estimate FPE. However, MCR calculated during EGC appears to be a poor surrogate for FPE.

ObjectiveTo determine whether a selective increase of visceral adipose tissue content will result in insulin resistance.Design and MethodsSympathetic denervation of the omental fat was performed under general inhalant anesthesia by injecting 6-hydroxydopamine in the omental fat of lean mongrel dogs (n=11). In the conscious animal, whole-body insulin sensitivity was assessed by the minimal model (SI) and the euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp (SICLAMP). Changes in abdominal fat were monitored by magnetic resonance. All assessments were determined before (Wk0) and 2 weeks (Wk2) after denervation. Data are medians (upper and lower interquartile).ResultsDenervation of omental fat resulted in increased percentage (and content) of visceral fat [Wk0: 10.2% (8.5−11.4); Wk2: 12.4% (10.4−13.6); P<0.01]. Abdominal subcutaneous fat remained unchanged. However, we found no changes in SI [Wk0: 4.7 (mU/L)−1•min−1 (3.1−8.8); Wk2: 5.3 (mU/L)−1•min−1 (4.5−7.2); P=0.59] or SICLAMP [Wk0: 42.0 ×10.4 dL•kg−1•min−1•(mU/L)−1 (41.0−51.0); Wk2: 40.0 ×10.4 dL•kg−1•min−1•(mU/L)−1 (34.0−52.0); P=0.67].ConclusionsDespite a selective increase in visceral adiposity in dogs, insulin sensitivityin vivo does not change, which argues against the concept that accumulation of visceral adipose tissue contributes to insulin resistance.

BackgroundExenatide’s effects on glucose metabolism have been studied extensively in diabetes but not in pre-diabetes.ObjectiveWe examined the chronic effects of exenatide alone on glucose metabolism in pre-diabetic canines.Design and MethodsAfter 10 weeks of high-fat diet (HFD), adult dogs received one injection of streptozotocin (STZ, 18.5 mg/kg). After induction of pre-diabetes, while maintained on HFD, animals were randomized to receive either exenatide (n = 7) or placebo (n = 7) for 12 weeks. β-Cell function was calculated from the intravenous glucose tolerance test (IVGTT, expressed as the acute insulin response, AIRG), the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT, insulinogenic index) and the graded-hyperglycemic clamp (clamp insulinogenic index). Whole-body insulin sensitivity was assessed by the IVGTT. At the end of the study, pancreatic islets were isolated to assess β-cell function in vitro.ResultsOGTT: STZ caused an increase in glycemia at 120 min by 22.0% (interquartile range, IQR, 31.5%) (P = 0.011). IVGTT: This protocol also showed a reduction in glucose tolerance by 48.8% (IQR, 36.9%) (P = 0.002). AIRG decreased by 54.0% (IQR, 40.7%) (P = 0.010), leading to mild fasting hyperglycemia (P = 0.039). Exenatide, compared with placebo, decreased body weight (P<0.001) without altering food intake, fasting glycemia, insulinemia, glycated hemoglobin A1c, or glucose tolerance. Exenatide, compared with placebo, increased both OGTT- (P = 0.040) and clamp-based insulinogenic indexes (P = 0.016), improved insulin secretion in vitro (P = 0.041), but had no noticeable effect on insulin sensitivity (P = 0.405).ConclusionsIn pre-diabetic canines, 12-week exenatide treatment improved β-cell function but not glucose tolerance or insulin sensitivity. These findings demonstrate partial beneficial metabolic effects of exenatide alone on an animal model of pre-diabetes.