Pawning of heritage land (tanah pusako) is agenerally implemented by community inTilatang KamangDistrict, Nagari Koto Tangahof West Sumatera Province, Indonesia. There are some differences between the heritage land pawning agreement in the area with that have been regulated in Indonesian positive law. Therefore, the aim of this research was to study how tobind the pawn agreement over heritage land in Nagari Koto Tangah. The method of the study was using an empirical juridical approach. The data used in this study were primary data in the form of interviews and observations in the field, while secondary data consists of document learning. The result showed that the method of heritage land pawning agreement in Nagari Koto Tangah is carried out ina written documents and is witnessed and known by the penghulu (tribal chief) of each party, and Nagari Koto Tangah already manage the ruleof the registration of the land pawn agreement.
This research explained about problematic execution of criminal sanctions for minimum fine in 1945 constitution number 35/2009 concerning on narcotics in legal region of Dharmasraya District Attorney Office and the effort to overcome those problematic based on constitution number 35/2019 concerning in narcotics in legal region of Dharmasraya District Attorney Office. This research used criminal theory and law enforcement theory, the method used here is empirical research category and research location within Dharmasraya District Attorney. The result of this research indicates that the whole problem of criminal concern in narcotics which handled by Dharmasraya District Attorney, none of the convicted people implementing judge decision of criminal sanction. Most of the convicts choose to take a prison sanction as a substitute of paying penalty money rather than paying penalty money itself. There are two main factors of why most convicts choosing that decision, economic limitation of every convicts and the possibility of every convicts to take a prison punishment with a quite short period and it considered better than paying penalty as punishment. On its implementation of making criminal punishment decision, public attorney could not make a maximum effort to make convicts obeying the punishment penalty. Public attorney only able to asking for charge, however if the convicts cannot pay the punishment money, they will get a declaration letter of incapable to pay and being imprisoned.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.