Background Vulvar melanoma (VuM) and vaginal melanoma (VaM) represent a unique subgroup of malignant melanomas with important differences in biology and treatment. Objective The objective of this study was to describe the epidemiology and prognosis of VuM and VaM in a large representative cohort. Methods Women with invasive VuM or VaM were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results-18 population representing 27.8% of the US population. Data on age, ethnicity, stage, location, histopathology, primary surgery, and lymphadenectomy were collected. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze disease-specific and overall survival. Univariate and multivariate regression models were used to identify factors with a significant association with disease-specific survival. Results A total of 1400 VuM and 463 VaM were included for further analysis; 78.6% and 49.7% of women with VuM and VaM underwent surgery, but only 52.9% of women with non-metastatic VuM and 42.9% of women with non-metastatic VaM undergoing surgery had lymph node assessment; one third of these had positive nodes. Superficial spreading was the most common subtype in VuM, and nodular melanoma in VaM (p < 0.001). The median disease-specific survival was 99 months (95% confidence interval 60-138) and 19 months (95% confidence interval 16-22), respectively. Survival was significantly associated with age at diagnosis, ethnicity, stage, surgery, lymph node metastases, histologic subtype, ulceration, mitotic count, and tumor thickness in VuM, and stage, surgery, and lymph node involvement in VaM. In the Cox model, lymph node status and number of mitoses remained independent predictors of outcome in VuM; in VaM, only lymph node status remained significant. Conclusions The overall prognosis of VuM and VaM remains poor. The American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system is applicable and should be used for VuM; however, lymph node status and mitotic rate are the most important predictors of survival. Lymph node status should be assessed and patients with positive nodes may be candidates for adjuvant treatment.

SummaryVulvar cancer represents the fourth most common gynecologic malignancy and is often encountered by the general Dermatologist or Gynecologist. Dermatooncologists and Gynecologic Oncologists share expertise in this field and the diagnosis and treatment should ideally be interdisciplinary. All subtypes are typically seen in the later decades of life, although all histologic subtypes have been described in women younger than 30 years. The diagnosis is often delayed. Exact mapping of biopsies is of high importance, as the location and distance from the midline guides the surgical approach depending on the underlying histology. Squamous cell carcinoma accounts for more than 76 % of vulvar cancer with vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia being an important precursor. Basal cell carcinoma is the second most common vulvar malignancy. Melanoma accounts for 5.7 % of vulvar cancer and has a worse prognosis compared to cutaneous melanoma. Most of the trials on checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy have not excluded patients with vulvar melanoma and the preliminary evidence is reviewed in the manuscript.Surgery remains the primary treatment modality of locally resectable vulvar cancer. In view of the rarity, the procedure should be performed in dedicated cancer centers to achieve optimal disease control and maintain continence and sexual function whenever possible.

Childhood alopecia areata is more prevalent in girls than in boys, but boys have more extensive alopecia areata. Despite the low prevalence, congenital alopecia areata is an important differential diagnosis for neonatal hair loss. Alopecia areata runs in families, suggesting an underlying genetic background. One-quarter of the children reported at least one affected first-degree relative; 8% had more than three affected relatives.

Summary Primary cutaneous lymphomas are extranodal non‐Hodgkin lymphomas of T‐ or B‐ cell origin, that predominantly affect older patients but have been reported in all age groups and as early as in the first years of life. Diagnosis of cutaneous lymphomas is challenging and requires high clinical suspicion and close collaboration between dermatologists, pediatric oncologists and pathologists. Skin involvement of non‐Hodgkin lymphomas in children or adolescents can either be primary cutaneous or secondary due to an underlying nodal lymphoma. The most common primary cutaneous lymphomas encountered in children are of T‐cell origin, with mycosis fungoides being the most prevalent cutaneous T‐cell lymphoma, followed by CD30+ lymphoproliferative disorders. While cutaneous lymphomas share clinicopathologic characteristics between juvenile and adult forms, there are important differences in terms of clinical presentation, diagnosis and treatment. The hypopigmented variant of mycosis fungoides seems to be overrepresented in the pediatric age group. Prognosis and treatment of mycosis fungoides are stage dependent. The majority of children present with early‐stage disease and respond well to topical corticosteroids and phototherapy.

Complete visualization of lesions is critical for the accurate diagnosis and management of dermatological diseases. Currently, the most readily available technologies used by dermatologists include dermoscopy and photography. Nevertheless, ultrasound has emerged as a useful non-invasive modality in dermatology, which can be added to the clinical examination supporting an early and more accurate diagnosis. Moreover, there are significant technological advances in recent years, such as the development of handheld devices and ultra-high frequency probes that have expanded the integration of ultrasound into daily dermatology practice. In this article, we reviewed the most common applications of ultrasound in the field of dermatology.

No abstract

Ten percent of all women have pigmented vulvar lesions. Fortunately, most of these are benign but 1% of all melanomas in women affect the vulva. While the mortality rate of cutaneous melanoma has dropped by 7% annually during the last 5 years, the prognosis of vulvar melanoma remains dismal: the 5-year overall survival rate is 47% compared with 92% for cutaneous melanoma. The current evidence suggests that this likely results from a combination of delayed diagnosis and different tumor biology, treatment strategies, and treatment response. Although many landmark trials on checkpoint inhibitors included mucosal and vulvar melanomas, the results were often not reported separately. Post-hoc analyses indicate overall response rates between 19 and 37% for checkpoint inhibitors. A recently published retrospective study on vulvar melanomas suggests an objective response in 33.3% with a similar safety profile to cutaneous melanoma. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors may be considered in recurrent disease if a c-KIT mutation is present. Key PointsCompared with skin melanomas, vulvar melanomas are associated with a poor prognosis resulting from delayed diagnosis and different tumor biology, treatment strategies, and treatment response.Novel treatment modalities include checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapies and recent evidence shows that these are also effective in vulvar melanomas.Vulvar melanomas have a different tumor biology with frequent c-KIT mutations, which provides an additional therapeutic target in recurrent disease.

Objectives The aims of the study were to assess the clinical and histopathological characteristics of a comprehensive cohort of women with vulvovaginal melanoma (VVM) treated at our institution and to study the treatment response of checkpoint inhibitors in this patient cohort. Materials and Methods This is a retrospective study of women with invasive VVM treated at the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre in Toronto, Ontario, Canada, over a period of 15 years. Clinical and histopathological characteristics, treatment, as well as treatment-related outcome were analyzed in 32 women. Treatment response was evaluated retrospectively using the “response criteria for use in trials testing immunotherapeutics” (iRECIST). The objective response rate was defined as the proportion of patients with complete or partial response based on the best overall response. Results At a median follow-up of 37.8 months (5.8–110.4), 26 women (81.3%) had disease progression and 16 (50%) died. Thirteen patients with locally unresectable or metastatic melanoma were treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Ten additional cases were identified from previously published reports. The best objective response rate for immune checkpoint inhibitors was 30.4% (95% CI = 11.6%–49.2%) and the clinical benefit rate was 52.2% (95% CI = 31.8%–72.6%). The clinical benefit rate was significantly better for programmed cell death protein 1 inhibitors (or a combination) compared with ipilimumab alone (Fisher exact, p = .023). Grade 3/4 adverse events were observed in 3 (13.0%) of the 23 patients. Conclusions Women with VVM constitute a high-risk group with poor overall prognosis. Immune checkpoint inhibitors are effective in the treatment of metastatic melanoma in this patient cohort.