IMPORTANCE Children who receive a cochlear implant (CI) for early severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss may achieve age-appropriate spoken language skills not possible before implantation. Despite these advances, reduced access to auditory experience may have downstream effects on fundamental neurocognitive processes for some children with CIs. OBJECTIVE To determine the relative risk (RR) of clinically significant executive functioning deficits in children with CIs compared with children with normal hearing (NH). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS In this prospective, cross-sectional study, 73 children at a hospital-based clinic who received their CIs before 7 years of age and 78 children with NH, with average to above average mean nonverbal IQ scores, were recruited in 2 age groups: preschool age (age range, 3–5 years) and school age (age range, 7–17 years). No children presented with other developmental, cognitive, or neurologic diagnoses. INTERVENTIONS Parent-reported checklist measures of executive functioning were completed during psychological testing sessions. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Estimates of the RR of clinically significant deficits in executive functioning (≥ 1 SDs above the mean) for children with CIs compared with children with NH were obtained based on 2 parent-reported child behavior checklists of everyday problems with executive functioning. RESULTS In most domains of executive functioning, children with CIs were at 2 to 5 times greater risk of clinically significant deficits compared with children with NH. The RRs for preschoolers and school-aged children, respectively, were greatest in the areas of comprehension and conceptual learning (RR [95% CI], 3.56 [1.71–7.43] and 6.25 [2.64–14.77]), factual memory ( 4.88 [1.58–15.07] and 5.47 [2.03–14.77]), attention (3.38 [1.03–11.04] and 3.13 [1.56–6.26]), sequential processing (11.25 [1.55–81.54] and 2.44 [1.24–4.76]), working memory (4.13 [1.30–13.06] and 3.64 [1.61–8.25] for one checklist and 1.77 [0.82–3.83] and 2.78 [1.18–6.51] for another checklist), and novel problem-solving (3.93 [1.50–10.34] and 3.13 [1.46–6.67]). No difference between the CI and NH samples was found for visual-spatial organization (2.63 [0.76–9.03] and 1.04 [0.45–2.40] on one checklist and 2.86 [0.98–8.39] for school-aged children on the other checklist). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE A large proportion of children with CIs are at risk for clinically significant deficits across multiple domains of executive functioning, a rate averaging 2 to 5 times that of children with NH for most domains. Screening for risk of executive functioning deficits should be a routine part of the clinical evaluation of all children with deafness and CIs.

Purpose The purpose of this study was to determine whether deficits in executive functioning (EF) in children with cochlear implants (CIs) emerge as early as the preschool years. Method Two groups of children ages 3 to 6 years participated in this cross-sectional study: 24 preschoolers who had CIs prior to 36 months of age and 21 preschoolers with normal hearing (NH). All were tested on normed measures of working memory, inhibition-concentration, and organization-integration. Parents completed a normed rating scale of problem behaviors related to EF. Comparisons of EF skills of children with CIs were made to peers with NH and to published nationally representative norms. Results Preschoolers with CIs showed significantly poorer performance on inhibition-concentration and working memory compared with peers with NH and with national norms. No group differences were found in visual memory or organization-integration. When data were controlled for language, differences in performance measures of EF remained, whereas differences in parent-reported problems with EF were no longer significant. Hearing history was generally unrelated to EF. Conclusions This is the first study to demonstrate that EF deficits found in older children with CIs begin to emerge as early as preschool years. The ability to detect these deficits early has important implications for early intervention and habilitation after cochlear implantation.

ObjectiveUnexplained variability in speech recognition outcomes among postlingually deafened adults with cochlear implants (CIs) is an enormous clinical and research barrier to progress. This variability is only partially explained by patient factors (e.g., duration of deafness) and auditory sensitivity (e.g., spectral and temporal resolution). This study sought to determine whether non‐auditory neurocognitive skills could explain speech recognition variability exhibited by adult CI users.Study DesignThirty postlingually deafened adults with CIs and thirty age‐matched normal‐hearing (NH) controls were enrolled.MethodsParticipants were assessed for recognition of words in sentences in noise and several non‐auditory measures of neurocognitive function. These non‐auditory tasks assessed global intelligence (problem‐solving), controlled fluency, working memory, and inhibition‐concentration abilities.ResultsFor CI users, faster response times during a non‐auditory task of inhibition‐concentration predicted better recognition of sentences in noise; however, similar effects were not evident for NH listeners.ConclusionsFindings from this study suggest that inhibition‐concentration skills play a role in speech recognition for CI users, but less so for NH listeners. Further research will be required to elucidate this role and its potential as a novel target for intervention.

Results from this study suggest that several underlying foundational neurocognitive abilities are related to core speech perception outcomes after implantation in older adults. Implications of these findings for explaining individual differences and variability and predicting speech recognition outcomes after implantation are discussed.

Objectives/Hypothesis: Cochlear implants (CIs) restore auditory sensation to patients with moderate-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss. However, the benefits to speech recognition vary considerably among patients. Advancing age contributes to this variability in postlingual adult CI users. Similarly, older individuals with normal hearing (NH) perform more poorly on tasks of recognition of spectrally degraded speech. The overarching hypothesis of this study was that the detrimental effects of advancing age on speech recognition can be attributed both to declines in auditory spectral resolution as well as declines in cognitive functions. Study Design: Case-control study. Methods: Speech recognition was assessed in CI users (in the clear) and NH controls (spectrally degraded using noise-vocoding), along with auditory spectral resolution using the Spectral–Temporally Modulated Ripple Test. Cognitive skills were assessed using nonauditory visual measures of working memory, inhibitory control, speed of lexical/phonological access, nonverbal reasoning, and perceptual closure. Linear regression models were tested for mediation to explain aging effects on speech recognition performance. Results: For both groups, older age predicted poorer sentence and word recognition. The detrimental effects of advancing age on speech recognition were partially mediated by declines in spectral resolution and in some measures of cognitive function. Conclusions: Advancing age contributes to poorer recognition of degraded speech for CI users and NH controls through declines in both auditory spectral resolution and cognitive functions. Findings suggest that improvements in spectral resolution as well as cognitive improvements may serve as therapeutic targets to optimize CI speech recognition outcomes.