The observation that the phenolic hydroxyl of THCs was important for binding to the CB1 receptor but not as critical for binding to the CB2 receptor prompted us to extend this finding to the cannabinol (CBN) series. To study the SAR of CBN analogues, CBN derivatives with substitution at the C-1, C-3, and C-9 positions were chosen since these positions have played a key role in the SAR of THCs. CBN-3-(1',1'-dimethylheptyl) analogues were prepared by sulfur dehydrogenation of Delta(8)-THC-3-(1',1'-dimethylheptyl) analogues. 9-Substituted CBN analogues were prepared by the standard sulfur dehydrogenation of 9-substituted Delta(8)-THC analogues (Scheme 1), which in turn were prepared following our previous procedure using selenium dioxide oxidation of the corresponding Delta(8)-THCs followed by sodium chlorite oxidation to give the 9-carboxy-Delta(8)-THC derivatives. 11-Hydroxy-CBN analogues were prepared from the corresponding 9-carbomethoxy-CBN analogues by reduction with LiAlH(4). Deoxy-CBN analogue 14 was prepared from the corresponding Delta(8)-THC analogue 11 by conversion of the phenolic hydroxyl to the phosphate derivative 12, followed by lithium ammonia reduction to provide the deoxy-Delta(8)-THC analogue 13, which in turn was dehydrogenated with sulfur to provide the deoxy-CBN analogue 14 (Scheme 2). The various analogues were assayed for binding both to the brain and the peripheral cannabinoid receptors (CB1 and CB2). We have found that the binding profile differs widely between the CBN and the THC series. Specifically, in the CBN series the removal of the phenolic hydroxyl decreases binding affinity to both the CB1 and CB2 receptors, whereas in the THC series, CB1 affinity is selectively reduced. Thus, in the CBN series, the selectivity of binding observed with the removal of the hydroxy group is decreased severalfold as compared to what occurs in the THC series. Generally, high affinity for the CB2 receptor was found in analogues when the phenolic hydroxyl was present. The 3-(1', 1'-dimethylheptyl) derivatives were found to have much higher affinities than the CBN analogues, which is in complete agreement with previously reported work by Rhee et al.

Peripheral selective mu opioid receptor (MOR) antagonists could alleviate the symptoms of opioid-induced constipation (OIC) without compromising the analgesic effect of opioids. However, a variety of adverse effects were associated with them, partially due to their relatively low MOR selectivity. NAP, a 6β-N-4'-pyridyl substituted naltrexamine derivative, was identified previously as a potent and highly selective MOR antagonist mainly acting within the peripheral nervous system. The noticeable diarrhea associated with it prompted the design and synthesis of its analogues in order to study its structure activity relationship. Among them, compound 8 showed improved pharmacological profiles compared to the original lead, acting mainly at peripheral while increasing the intestinal motility in morphine-pelleted mice (ED50=0.03 mg/kg). The slight decrease of the ED50 compared to the original lead was well compensated by the unobserved adverse effect. Hence, this compound seems to be a more promising lead to develop novel therapeutic agents toward OIC.

We previously reported that the compound O‐2093 is a selective inhibitor of the reuptake of the endocannabinoid anandamide (AEA). We have now re‐examined the activity of O‐2093 in vivo and synthesized four structural analogs (O‐2247, O‐2248, O‐3246, and O‐3262), whose activity was assessed in: (a) binding assays carried out with membranes from cells overexpressing the human CB1 and CB2 receptors; (b) assays of transient receptor potential of the vanilloid type‐1 (TRPV1) channel functional activity (measurement of [Ca2+]i); (c) [14C]AEA cellular uptake and hydrolysis assays in rat basophilic leukaemia (RBL‐2H3) cells; (d) the mouse ‘tetrad’ tests (analgesia on a hot plate, immobility on a ‘ring’, rectal hypothermia and hypolocomotion in an open field); and (e) the limb spasticity test in chronic relapsing experimental allergic encephalomyelitis (CREAE) mice, a model of multiple sclerosis (MS). O‐2093, either synthesized by us or commercially available, was inactive in the ‘tetrad’ up to a 20 mg kg−1 dose (i.v.). Like O‐2093, the other four compounds exhibited low affinity in CB1 (Ki from 1.3 to >10 μM) and CB2 binding assays (1.310 μM), very low potency as fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH) inhibitors (IC50>25 μM) and were inactive in the ‘tetrad’ up to a 30 mg kg−1 dose (i.v.). While O‐2247 and O‐2248 were poor inhibitors of [14C]AEA cellular uptake (IC50>40 μM), O‐3246 and O‐3262 were quite potent in this assay. O‐3246, which exhibits only a very subtle structural difference with O‐2093, is the most potent inhibitor of AEA uptake reported in vitro under our experimental conditions (IC50=1.4 μM) and is 12‐fold more potent than O‐2093. When injected intravenously O‐3246 and O‐3262, again like O‐2093 and unlike O‐2247 and O‐2248, significantly inhibited limb spasticity in mice with CREAE. These data confirm the potential utility of selective AEA uptake inhibitors as anti‐spasticity drugs in MS and, given the very subtle chemical differences between potent and weak inhibitors of uptake, support further the existence of a specific mechanism for this process. British Journal of Pharmacology (2006) 147, 83–91. doi:

No abstract