SummaryBackgroundAcute appendicitis is an emergent surgically treated disease generally represented by right lower abdominal pain. The most common location of the appendix is descending intraperitoneal. However, it can also show atypical locations such as inguinal canal, femoral canal, subhepatic, retrocecal, intraperitoneal abdominal midline and left side in situs inversus or intestinal malrotation patients. Atypical location can lead to atypical clinical presentations. Ultrasonography is the first choice modality for imaging. However, it can be insufficient for demonstration of the appendix. Therefore, computed tomography (CT) is needed for further examination. We aim to review the CT findings of atypically located acute appendicitis with cases and remind the clinicians and radiologists the importance of the prompt diagnosis.Case ReportWe presented five atypically-located appendix cases, including four with acute appendicitis that presented to our emergency department with acute abdominal pain. Two of the acute appendicitis cases had normal, the other two had elevated white blood cell count, but all of them had elevated CRP. Ultrasonography imaging was performed as a first-line imaging modality. Because of the inconclusive results of both clinical-laboratory findings and ultrasonography, CT imaging was performed. Abdominal CT demonstrated all of the atypically localised appendices successfully, which were left-sided in a malrotated patient, retrocecal, subhepatic, retrocecal ascending, intraperitoneal abdominal midline localised.ConclusıonsAtypically located acute appendicitis can show atypical presentation and result in misdiagnosis. If ultrasonograpgy is inconclusive, we suggest abdominal CT in such confusing, complicated cases, because misdiagnosis or delay in the right diagnosis can result in complications and increased morbidity and mortality rates.

SummaryBackgroundIsolated small bowel perforation following blunt abdominal trauma (BAT) is an uncommon situation with high morbidity and mortality rates, and delayed small bowel perforation is even rarer. The pathophysiology of this condition is not clear in all cases. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case report of delayed small bowel perforation following BAT with extensive portomesenteric vein gas.Case ReportA 33-year-old male patient was admitted to the emergency department after a car accident. His initial abdominal CT showed no signs of posstraumatic injury. However, follow-up CT, performed after deterioration in his general condition, showed jejunal dilatation, intestinal intramural gas, portomesenteric vein gas, extensive intraperitoneal gas and intraabdominal free fluid. CT findings and emergent laparotomy findings were both compatible with small bowel ischemia-necrosis and perforation.ConclusionsDelayed small bowel perforation following BAT is thought to occur secondary to mesenteric hematoma formation or mesenteric tear complications. Our patient did not have any mesenteric injury or hematoma on initial abdominal CT. We are not aware of any other case report of delayed small bowel perforation following BAT without signs of intraabdominal injury on initial imaging and extensive portomesenteric vein gas on follow-up imaging. Ischemic bowel necrosis was the main cause of portomesenteric vein gas in our case. Posttraumatic patients should be kept under medical observation and abdominal CT should be preferred for imaging in case of a deterioration in the general condition and laboratory findings or appearance of new abdominal complaints.