BackgroundAlthough cervical cancer is preventable, it is still the second leading cause of cancer deaths among women in the world. Further, it is estimated that around 5–10% of hospital admissions are due to drug related problems (DRPs), of which 50% are avoidable. In cancer therapy, there is an immense potential for DRPs due to the high toxicity of most chemotherapeutic regimens. Hence, this study sought to assess DRPs among patients with cervical cancer at Kenyatta National Hospital (KNH).MethodsA cross-sectional study was conducted at the oncology units of KNH. A total of 81 study participants were recruited through simple random sampling. Data were collected from medical records and interviewing patients. The appropriateness of medical therapy was evaluated by comparing with National Compressive Cancer Network and European Society for Medical Oncology practice guideline of cervical cancer treatment protocol. The degree of adherence was determined using eight-item Morisky medication adherence scale. The likelihood of drug interaction was assessed using Medscape, Micromedex and Epocrates drug interaction checkers. The data were entered in Microsoft Excel and analysed using statistical software STATA version 13.0. Descriptive statistics such as mean, percent and frequency were used to summarise patients’ characteristics. Univariable and multivariable binary logistic regression were used to investigate the potential predictors of DRPs.ResultA total of 215 DRPs were identified from 76 patients, translating to a prevalence of 93.8% and a mean of 2.65 ± 1.22 DRPs. The predominant proportion of DRPs (48.2%) was identified in patients who had been treated with chemoradiation regimens. Adverse drug reactions 56(69.1%) and drug interactions 38(46.9%) were the most prevalent DRPs. Majority (67.9%) of the study population were adherent to their treatment regimens. Forgetfulness 18(69.2%), expensive medications 4(15.4%) and side effects of medications 4(15.4%) were the main reasons for medication non-adherence. Patients with advanced stage cervical cancer were 15.4 times (AOR = 15.4, 95% CI = 1.3–185.87, p = 0.031) more likely to have DRPs as compared to patients with early stage disease.ConclusionAdverse drug reactions, drug interactions, and need of additional drug therapy were the most common DRPs identified among cervical cancer patients. Advanced stage cervical cancer was the only predictor of DRPs.

Introduction: Cancer is not only a burden in the country but also a global burden with among the highest rate of mortality. In spite of the great strides made by the conventional therapy, many cancer patients have resorted to using complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) as human beings have an innate urge to try new and alternative ways to relieve their suffering. Objectives: There is a need for us to establish if the cancer patients at Kenyatta National Hospital, Nairobi use CAM, to establish the socio-demographic characteristics of patients in the oncology clinic, to establish the types and patterns of CAM use, to establish the reasons and factors that may contribute to CAM use and if the primary health care provider is aware that they are using CAM. Methodology: Face-to-face interviews using semi-structured questionnaires were used to determine the use of CAM by the cancer patients. All consenting cancer patients who satisfied the inclusion criteria were interviewed as they presented to the oncology clinic. Results: A total of 78 respondents were interviewed during the study out of which 35 (44.9%) were male, while 43 (55.1%) were female. The age distribution was from 18 to above. Eleven patients (14.1%) have used CAM at one point during their treatment. The use of CAM was not affected by the age, gender, and marital status, level of education and level of income. The most frequently used CAM was herbal medicine; 64.0% of the patients used CAM with the hope of curing their disease, while 36.0% used it with the hope of getting symptomatic relief. Among the CAM users, only 45.0% were satisfied with the use of it, while 55.0% were disappointed as it did not meet their expectations and would therefore never recommend the of CAM to anyone else; 27.0% obtained some benefit from the use of CAM, 27.0% did not experience any benefit and a further 46.0% were unclear about any notable benefit experienced; 55.0% of the CAM users had disclosed their use of CAM to the doctor, while 45.0% did not disclose this reason mostly because they do not feel it is important to let the doctor know as he/she never asks. Conclusion: The prevalence of CAM use among cancer patients in Kenyatta National Hospital ranks lower compared to other countries. The most common type of CAM in use is herbal medicine. However, most patients do not obtain the expected benefits and do not disclose this information to the doctors as they feel it is not important.

The Oncology Pharmacy Team (OPT), consisting of specialty-trained pharmacists and/or pharmacy technicians, is an integral component of the multidisciplinary healthcare team (MHT) involved with all aspects of cancer patient care. The OPT fosters quality patient care, safety, and local regulatory compliance. The International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners (ISOPP) developed this position statement to provide guidance on five key areas: 1) oncology pharmacy practice as a pharmacy specialty; 2) contributions to patient care; 3) oncology pharmacy practice management; 4) education and training; and 5) contributions to oncology research and quality initiatives to involve the OPT. This position statement advocates that: 1) the OPT be fully incorporated into the MHT to optimize patient care; 2) educational and healthcare institutions develop programs to continually educate OPT members; and 3) regulatory authorities develop certification programs to recognize the unique contributions of the OPT in cancer patient care.

Background Research has established the development of steroid-induced hyperglycemia as a glucometabolic side effect of high-dose prednisone therapy. Few studies, however, have demonstrated preventative measures that could effectively curtail this side effect in susceptible patients undergoing high-dose prednisone treatment. Objective To assess metformin's prophylactic effectiveness of prednisone-induced hyperglycemia among hematological cancer patients. Setting Prospective randomized controlled trial conducted at the Kenyatta National Hospital Oncology Clinic and Wards, Nairobi, Kenya. Method Non-hyperglycemic hematological cancer patients on current or newly initiated high-dose prednisone-based chemotherapy were randomized to receive metformin 850 mg once then 850 mg twice daily for two successive weeks each or to the control group receiving the standard care. Patients were subjected to once weekly fasting and 2-h postprandial glucose measurements for four weeks. Main outcome measure The primary outcome of measure was the development of hyperglycemia defined by fasting capillary blood glucose values >5.6 mmol/L or 2-h postprandial capillary blood glucose values >7.8 mmol/L. Results Eighteen of 24 randomized patients completed the study (11 control and 7 treatment). The proportion of the control subjects that developed prediabetes was 72.7% (95% confidence interval 45.5–90.9%) using fasting glucose and 54.5% (95% confidence interval 27.3–81.8%) using 2-h postprandial glucose. One treatment group participant developed prediabetes using fasting glucose, representing 14.3% (95% confidence interval 0–42.9%). No prediabetes was detected using the 2-h postprandial glucose. Analysis of mean fasting glucose between the two arms found no significant difference. However, significant differences in mean 2-h postprandial glucose were noted in week 2 ( p = 0.0144), week 3 ( p = 0.0095), and week 4 ( p = 0.0074) of the study. Double dose (1700 mg) metformin was more effective in lowering blood glucose than single dose (850 mg) ( p = 1.0000 (fasting), p = 0.4531(2-h postprandial). Conclusion Metformin's prophylactic effectiveness was demonstrated in this randomized study on new and previously exposed non-diabetic cancer patients on high-dose prednisone-based chemotherapy.