No abstract

In 220 consecutive patients with non-obstructive azoospermia, sperm retrieval was attempted by a combination of conventional and microdissection testicular sperm extraction (TESE). For sperm retrieval, 2-3 conventional biopsies were performed followed by a microdissection TESE in cases of negative conventional biopsies. During the surgery, the vasculature of the testis was assessed using the operative microscope, and the location of positive biopsies was registered in relation to the blood supply. The overall sperm retrieval rate was 58.2%. From the initial conventional biopsies, sperm could be retrieved in 46.8% of the patients. With microdissection TESE, sperm could be retrieved from an additional 11.4% of the patients. The further use of microdissection TESE improved the sperm retrieval rate significantly (P50.017). No significant accumulation of positive biopsies was found towards the rete testis or the main testicular vessels.

During a period of 8 years, 1,079 intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) procedures with aspirated epididymal or testicular spermatozoa were performed. Epididymal spermatozoa were used in 172 cycles and testicular spermatozoa or spermatids in 907 cycles. Multiple biopsies were obtained from at least two different locations in the testes. Retrieved spermatozoa were used after cryopreservation (frozen) or immediately after aspiration (fresh). Three hundred patients had obstructive azoospermia (OA) or ejaculation failure. In 414 cases, azoospermia was caused by impaired spermatogenesis resulting from maldescended testes, chemotherapy/radiotherapy, or by Sertoli-cell-only syndrome, genetic disorders or unknown aetiology. Transfer rates, pregnancy rates and birth rates per ICSI cycle showed no statistically significant differences between testicular and epididymal spermatozoa in men with OA (28% average birth rates in both cases). However, birth rates differed significantly with regard to the status of spermatogenesis. Treatment of men with nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA) resulted in a birth rate of 19% per cycle. In all patient groups, there was no difference in the birth rates achieved with fresh and cryopreserved spermatozoa. While testicular volume, follicle-stimulating hormone level and age of the male patient are no statistically significant prognostic factors, the underlying cause of azoospermia is the most important factor determining the outcome of ICSI with epididymal and testicular spermatozoa. The pregnancy rate is lower in NOA patients than in those with OA.

Introduction: Male infertility caused by azoospermia due to non-reconstructable obstruction or non-obstructive azoospermia can be treated by microsurgical epididymal aspiration (MESA) or testicular sperm extraction (TESE) followed by an intracytoplasmatic spermatozoa injection (ICSI). Material and Methods: From 9/93 to 6/01, we carried out 1,025 ICSI procedures with aspirated epididymal or testicular sperms in 684 cases. 163 ICSI cycles were performed with epididymal sperms and 862 ICSI cycles with testicular sperms or spermatids. The TESE was carried out by open biopsy, frequently in a multilocular technique. The aspirated spermatozoas were used after cryopreservation (frozen) or immediately after aspiration (fresh). Results: 538 patients had obstructive azoospermia or ejaculation failure. In 487 cases the underlying cause of azoospermia was an impaired spermatogenesis, following maldescensus testis, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or caused by Sertoli-cell-only syndrome, a genetic disorder or an unknown etiology. The transfer rates, pregnancy rates and birth rates per ICSI cycle showed no statistically significant differences between testicular and epididymal sperms in the cases of seminal obstruction (28% average birth rates in both cases). However, highly significant was the difference in birth rates with regard to the underlying cause of infertility. In contrast, in treating non-obstructive azoospermia we observed a birth rate of 19% per cycle. In all patient groups the birth rate with fresh spermatozoas did not differ from those with cryopreserved spermatozoa. 40% of patients after multilocular TESE showed clinical signs of testicular lesion. Conclusion: The underlying cause of azoospermia is the most important factor for the outcome of ICSI using epididymal and testicular sperms. In cases of non-obstructive azoospermia, the pregnancy rate is low compared with the results in cases of obstructive azoospermia. There is no difference between fresh and cryopreserved sperms. TESE with ICSI is the most efficient treatment of azoospermia caused by hypergonadotropic hypogonadism. The morbidity of the TESE procedure is highly relevant and must be considered if this technique is indicated.

Nonobstructive azoospermia is caused in up to 10% by microdeletions of the Y chromosome in the azoospermia factor (AZF) region, which is divided into three nonoverlapping areas (AZFa, AZFb and AZFc). In 25 male patients with AZF microdeletions, the results of two different techniques for surgical sperm retrieval (SR), conventional multilocular TESE and microdissection TESE, were studied retrospectively over a period of 19 years. Conventional multilocular TESE was carried out in 11 patients and microdissection TESE in 14 patients. Successful SR was possible only in patients with isolated AZFc microdeletions, so only the 20 patients with AZFc microdeletions alone were taken into account for the comparison of the both operative techniques. The sperm detection rate for conventional multilocular TESE was 25%, the sperm detection for microdissection TESE was significantly higher with 67%. In all patients, a histological examination of the testicular tissue was carried out, which showed a mixed picture, but Sertoli-cell-only syndrome in most cases. FSH was no prognostic marker for successful SR. In two of six couples performing an intracytoplasmic sperm injection until now, a pregnancy occurred.