This study examines the extent to which staff in local welfare systems have embraced new welfare reform goals and, if so, the extent to which local management practices contribute to the alignment of staff priorities with policy objectives. It looks at agency structure and several aspects of public management from a microperspective that prior research has linked to agency performance including training, performance monitoring, staff resources, leadership characteristics, and personnel characteristics. The research indicates that front-line workers in welfare offices continue to believe that traditional eligibility determination concerns are the most important goals at their agencies. It also finds that management practices and the structuring of agency responsibilities matter: To the extent that public managers want to redirect local staff to focus their attention on the new goals associated with welfare reform, they can create the conditions under which staff have clear signals about what is expected and could provide them with the resources and incentives to realign their priorities.The ability of public managers to influence their employees' commitment to policy and agency goals has long been an interest of scholars and practitioners of public administration. A common challenge for all public organizations is creating a commitment on the part of front-line workers to the policy decisions made by government officials. While this is key to the way that public policy is ultimately delivered, public administrators at all levels recognize the difficulty in achieving this commitment. This research builds on prior studies of goal congruence, public management, and policy achievement in government organizations to examine the extent to which staff in local welfare systems have embraced new goals established by federal and state welfare reforms and, if so, the extent to which local management practices may have contributed to the alignment of staff priorities with policy objectives. These objectives, articulated in federal and state laws during the 1990s, explicitly redirected the efforts of cash assistance programs from income maintenance to work enforcement. Implicitly, they created a new expectation that all welfare staff-from eligibility workers to employment specialists-would help to move clients off welfare and into jobs.We consider both agency structure and several aspects of public management from a microperspective that prior research has linked to agency performance-including training, performance monitoring, staff resources, leadership characteristics, and personnel characteristics.
This article examines whether the 1996 welfare reform has led to the culture change in welfare offices advocated by welfare leaders and administrators. Examining a sample of state and local welfare systems, it asks whether and how welfare organizations are seeking to change their culture or, if not their culture, at least some of the structures and processes of their welfare systems. After unpacking the concept of culture in the context of welfare reform, the research finds that welfare leaders and administrators interpret the concept of culture change more broadly than do scholars of organizational culture.Welfare practitioners consider changes in structure and process as culture change, whereas scholars of organizational culture see these changes as only changes in artifacts. Scholars would consider these practitioners'interpretations to be superficial and would argue that they underestimate what it actually takes to effect changes in beliefs, perceptions, and feelings that are sufficiently deep to be called cultural transformations.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.