No abstract

Gastric cancer (GC) represents a global health concern. Despite advances in prevention, diagnosis, and therapy, GC is still the third leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide, with more than 720,000 estimated deaths in 2012. Overall survival for advanced disease is about 1 year, a dismal prognosis that is partly due to the high levels of biological heterogeneity found in GC. Indeed, GC is a highly heterogeneous disease from morphological and molecular standpoints. The numerous histological and molecular classifications currently available reflect such heterogeneity. Although recent high-throughput studies cluster the molecular data obtained into subgroups with clinical relevance, we still need a practical, prognostic, and predictive classification system, integrating morphological and molecular features, towards the identification of novel therapeutic targets. It is noteworthy that GC heterogeneity encompasses not only interpatient variability (intertumour heterogeneity), but also variations within the same tumour (intratumour heterogeneity). The latter encompasses spatial heterogeneity (in different tumour areas) and temporal heterogeneity (along progression from primary to recurrent and/or metastatic disease). In this review, we analyse the morphological, immunophenotypic, and molecular heterogeneity in GC as the basis for a better understanding of the disease, and discuss the practical implications for diagnostic pathology, prognostic evaluation, and precision therapy.

Hereditary diffuse gastric cancer (HDGC) is an autosomal dominant syndrome characterised by multigenerational diffuse gastric cancer, and is mainly caused by germline alterations in the CDH1 gene. Currently, endoscopy has limited diagnostic accuracy, and total gastrectomy (TG) is the treatment of choice for asymptomatic CDH1 carriers. In this study, we aimed to obtain a better understanding of HDGC syndrome by exploring the histopathological findings of TG specimens from asymptomatic HDGC patients. A comprehensive literature review was carried out, searching for TGs performed in asymptomatic HDGC patients. Fourteen unpublished cases, analysed in our institution, were also included. The series encompassed 174 CDH1 carriers. Preoperative endoscopic biopsies were positive in 28.3%. A macroscopic lesion was apparent in 11.7% of TGs. Histopathological analysis revealed intraepithelial lesions and/or intramucosal signet ring cell carcinoma in 87.9% of TGs. When we explored the type of protocol used for handling the specimens, we found that microscopic cancer foci were detected in 95.3% of TGs when a total-embedding protocol (assessment of the totality of gastric mucosa) was applied, and only in 62.5% when no specific protocol was used (P < 0.001). Helicobacter pylori infection was found in 23.4% cases. In conclusion, a thorough histopathological examination of gastric mucosa remains the gold standard for detection of cancer foci in HDGC gastrectomy specimens, requiring experienced pathologists for an accurate diagnosis. A better understanding of the natural history of HDGC will enable better clinical management of HDGC patients, particularly regarding the optimal timing for the performance of TG.