Primary somatosensory cortex (S1) receives two distinct classes of thalamocortical input via the lemniscal and paralemniscal pathways, the former via ventral posterior medial nucleus (VPM), and the latter, from the posterior medial nucleus (POm). These projections have been described as parallel thalamocortical pathways. Although the VPM thalamocortical projection has been studied in depth, several details of the POm projection to S1 are unknown. We studied the synaptic properties and anatomical features in the mouse of the projection from POm to all layers of S1 and to layer 4 of secondary somatosensory cortex (S2). Neurons in S1 responded to stimulation of POm with what has been termed Class 2 properties (paired-pulse facilitation, small initial excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs), a graded activation profile, and a metabotropic receptor component; thought to be modulatory), whereas neurons in layer 4 of S2 responded with Class 1A properties (paired-pulse depression, large initial EPSPs, an all-or-none activation profile, and no metabotropic receptor component, thought to be a main information input). Also, labeling from POm produced small boutons in S1, whereas both small and large boutons were found in S2. Our data suggest that the lemniscal and paralemniscal projections should not be thought of as parallel information pathways to S1 and that the paralemniscal projection may instead provide modulatory inputs to S1. driver | modulator | glutamatergic | barrel cortex | synapse P rimary somatosensory (also barrel or S1) cortex in rodents receives two distinct types of input from thalamus that are thought to convey different types of sensory information (1, 2). The lemniscal projection is relayed through the ventral posterior medial nucleus (VPM), whereas the paralemniscal projection is routed through posterior medial nucleus (POm) (3, 4). These projections are not only separated in thalamus, but remain largely segregated across cortical layers and in barrels and septa (3-8).The synaptic properties of the VPM or lemniscal projection to S1 have been described (9-12). VPM inputs to layer 4 and the subgranular layers have Class 1* (or driver) properties, suggesting that they are main information routes, whereas the projections to layers 2/3 have predominantly Class 2 properties, suggesting a modulatory rather than information-bearing function. If the paralemniscal projection to S1 is a parallel information route (3, 4), the prediction is that the synaptic properties of this pathway should be largely or exclusively Class 1A (for detailed explanation of classification terms, see refs. 11-13). POm is known to provide Class 1A input to layer 4 of secondary somatosensory cortex (S2) (10), but the POm projection to S1 has yet to be described. We thus studied the properties of the POm thalamocortical projection and found that the POm projection to S1 is entirely Class 2 in nature, suggesting that it provides modulatory inputs to S1 rather than functioning as a parallel information pathway. ResultsGlutamate Uncaging...

We studied the synaptic profile of thalamic inputs to cells in layers 2/3 and 4 of primary somatosensory (S1) and auditory (A1) cortices using thalamocortical slices from mice age postnatal days 10-18. Stimulation of the ventral posterior medial nucleus (VPM) or ventral division of the medial geniculate body (MGBv) resulted in two distinct classes of responses. The response of all layer 4 cells and a minority of layers 2/3 cells to thalamic stimulation was Class 1, including paired-pulse depression, all-or-none responses, and the absence of a metabotropic component. On the other hand, the majority of neurons in layers 2/3 showed a markedly different, Class 2 response to thalamic stimulation: paired-pulse facilitation, graded responses, and a metabotropic component. The Class 1 and Class 2 response characteristics have been previously seen in inputs to thalamus and have been described as drivers and modulators, respectively. Driver input constitutes a main information bearing pathway and determines the receptive field properties of the postsynaptic neuron, whereas modulator input influences the response properties of the postsynaptic neuron but is not a primary information bearing input. Because these thalamocortical projections have comparable properties to the drivers and modulators in thalamus, we suggest that a driver/modulator distinction may also apply to thalamocortical projections. In addition, our data suggest that thalamus is likely to be more than just a simple relay of information and may be directly modulating cortex.

The calcium-binding protein calbindin-D28k is critical for hippocampal function and cognition1-3, but its expression is markedly decreased in various neurological disorders associated with epileptiform activity and seizures4-7. In Alzheimer's disease (AD) and epilepsy, both of which are accompanied by recurrent seizures8, the severity of cognitive deficits reflects the degree of calbindin reduction in the hippocampal dentate gyrus (DG)4,9,10. However, despite the importance of calbindin in both neuronal physiology and pathology, the regulatory mechanisms that control its expression in the hippocampus are poorly understood. Here we report an epigenetic mechanism by which seizures chronically suppress hippocampal calbindin expression and impair cognition. We demonstrate that ΔFosB, a highly stable transcription factor, is induced in the hippocampus of mouse models of AD and seizures, where it binds and triggers histone deacetylation at the calbindin gene (Calb1) promoter, and downregulates Calb1 transcription. Notably, increasing DG calbindin levels, either by direct virus-mediated expression or inhibition of ΔFosB signaling, improves spatial memory in a mouse model of AD. Moreover, levels of ΔFosB and calbindin expression are inversely related in DG of patients with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) or AD, and correlate with performance on the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). We propose that chronic suppression of calbindin by ΔFosB is one mechanism by which intermittent seizures drive persistent cognitive deficits in conditions accompanied by recurrent seizures.

Summary Alzheimer's disease (AD) is characterized by cognitive decline and 5–10 fold increased seizure incidence. How seizures contribute to cognitive decline in AD or other disorders is unclear. We show spontaneous seizures increase expression of ΔFosB, a highly stable Fos-family transcription factor, in the hippocampus of an AD mouse model. ΔFosB suppressed expression of the immediate early gene c-Fos, which is critical for plasticity and cognition, by binding its promoter and triggering histone deacetylation. Acute HDAC inhibition or inhibition of ΔFosB activity restored c-Fos induction and improved cognition in AD mice. Administration of seizure-inducing agents to nontransgenic mice also resulted in ΔFosB-mediated suppression of c-Fos, suggesting this mechanism is not confined to AD mice. These results explain observations that c-Fos expression increases after acute neuronal activity but decreases with chronic activity. Moreover, these results indicate a general mechanism by which seizures contribute to persistent cognitive deficits even during seizure-free periods.