An anatomical-angiographic classification for carotid-cavernous sinus fistulas is introduced and a series of 14 patients with spontaneous carotid-cavernous sinus fistulas is reviewed to illustrate the usefulness of such a classification for patient evaluation and treatment. Fistulas are divided into four types: Type A are direct high-flow shunts between the internal carotid artery and the cavernous sinus; Type B are dural shunts between meningeal branches of the internal carotid artery and the cavernous sinus; Type C are dural shunts between meningeal branches of the external carotid artery and the cavernous sinus; and Type D are dural shunts between meningeal branches of both the internal and external carotid arteries and the cavernous sinus. The anatomy, clinical manifestations, angiographic evaluation, indications for therapy, and therapeutic options for spontaneous carotid-cavernous sinus fistulas are discussed.

Perineural tumor extension is a form of metastatic disease in which primary tumors spread along neural pathways and gain access to non-contiguous regions. The treatment and prognosis are altered when perineural extension occurs. Awareness and proper evaluation are critical for the radiologist. The third (mandibular) division of the trigeminal nerve (V3), passing through the skull base via the foramen ovale, is a common route of perineural spread of head and neck lesions. Seven patients with perineural tumor involvement of the mandibular nerve were evaluated with magnetic resonance imaging with use of standard spin-echo pulse sequences emphasizing T1-weighted information. Three patients had adenoid cystic carcinoma, three had squamous cell carcinoma, and one had well-differentiated lymphocytic lymphoma of the orbit. MR imaging signs of perineural involvement included smooth thickening of V3, concentric expansion of the foramen ovale, replacement of the normal trigeminal cistern hypointensity by an isointense mass, lateral bulging of cavernous sinus dural membranes, and atrophy of masticator muscles.

Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging characteristics of 40 tumors involving the parapharyngeal space and the upper part of the neck were reviewed. These lesions could be classified as being either hypervascular (glomus tumors or metastatic kidney, thyroid, or venous hemangiomas) or hypovascular (salivary gland tumors, neurogenic tumors, lymphomas, sarcomas). Detailed analysis of the contour of the neoplasm combined with clinical findings allowed further refinement of the differential diagnosis in each category. Most lesions had an intermediate signal intensity on T1-weighted images and a fairly high signal intensity on T2-weighted images. Hypervascular tumors had a number of "channel voids" caused by high-flow vessels on T1- and T2-weighted images, and on T2-weighted images there were areas of high signal intensity, presumably due to sites of slow flow within the image plane. The hypovascular lesions were quite homogeneous, and it was therefore more difficult to differentiate among the neoplasms in this group.

Recent advances in surgical techniques have enabled surgeons to approach previously inoperable deep-seated lesions of the skull base. The radiologist requires a thorough knowledge of the normal anatomy and the pathologic spectrum of this region and an understanding of imaging modalities in order to determine the extent of pathologic conditions and help plan the surgical approach. The embryologic development of the central skull base, normal gross anatomy, and anatomy as seen on computed tomographic and magnetic resonance images are presented.

Seven patients with central nervous system neoplasia and leptomeningeal metastases, proved either at initial diagnosis or on follow-up with contrast material-enhanced computed tomography (CT), were evaluated with magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. In two patients, diffuse sulcal enhancement on CT scans was inapparent on T1- or T2-weighted MR images. Likewise, in four patients diffuse cisternal enhancement on CT scans was not identifiable with MR. Nodular or focal cisternal masses were identified with both CT and MR imaging in three patients; in two, however, MR imaging provided less information. Ependymal and subependymal metastases identified with CT (two patients) were indistinguishable on MR images from periventricular abnormalities of radiation therapy and/or hydrocephalus. These findings suggest that leptomeningeal metastasis may be so subtle or inapparent as to be overlooked with MR imaging alone. Thus, CT and MR imaging should be considered complementary techniques for initial diagnosis and follow-up of tumors with a propensity for leptomeningeal metastasis.