BackgroundDislocation represents the most common complication after revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA). Understanding risk factors for dislocation has a great clinical relevance for every hip surgeon in order to consider all surgical options for effective planning. The aim of this systematic review was to answer two main questions—(1) what are the risk factors for instability after rTHA? and (2) what are the best preoperative assessments and surgical options to avoid dislocation after rTHA?Materials and methodsScientific databases were accessed to identify papers dealing with prevention and treatment of dislocation after rTHA. We performed a search using the keywords ‘revision hip arthroplasty’ and ‘dislocation’, ‘instability’, ‘outcome’, ‘failure’, ‘treatment’. After removal of duplicates and exclusion of works published in different languages, 33 articles were reviewed completely.ResultsRisk factors were analysed in order to establish the most relevant and evidence-based treatments available in the current literature.ConclusionsThe risk of dislocation after rTHA can be reduced using some precautions inferred from the literature. The use of a larger femoral and acetabular component, elevated rim liner and dual mobility implants can significantly reduce the risk of dislocation after rTHA. However, care must be taken regarding patient-related risk factors since these cannot be addressed and modified. Hence, a complete evaluation of risk factors should be performed for each patient and procedure before starting rTHA.
Thalassemia-associated osteoporosis constitutes a major complication in patients with thalassemia. This review presents the existing studies on the treatment of thalassemia-associated osteoporosis and discusses the management of this debilitating complication. A brief presentation of the disease characteristics and pathogenetic mechanisms is also provided. The life expectancy of patients with thalassemia has increased markedly in recent years resulting in the aging of the population and the emergence of new comorbidities. The majority of patients with thalassemia have low bone mineral density and experience lifelong fracture rates as high as 71 %. The pathogenesis of thalassemia-associated osteoporosis (TAO) is multifactorial with anemia and iron overload playing crucial role in its development. Data concerning the prevention and treatment of TAO are extremely limited. We performed a literature research in Pubmed and Scopus to identify interventional studies evaluating the effects of various agents on TAO. Seventeen studies were retrieved. We present the results of these studies as well as a brief overview of TAO including presentation, pathogenesis, and management. Most of the studies identified are of poor quality, are not randomized controlled, and include small number of participants. There are no data concerning effects on fracture rates. Bisphosphonates are the most widely studied agents and among them zoledronic acid is the most well studied. Hormone replacement treatment (HRT) shows beneficial but small effects. Denosumab and strontium ranelate have each been evaluated in only a single study, while there are no data about the effects of anabolic agents. Given the increased life expectancy and the increase in fracture rates with age, more data about the management of TAO are warranted. Moreover, due to the need for lifelong management starting at young age, careful treatment plans which may include sequential treatment may often be required. However, currently, there are no relevant data available.
TSH suppression therapy is associated with higher bone resorption only in postmenopausal women; this adversely affects trabecular and cortical bone properties especially at nonweight-bearing sites such as the radius.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.