Electrospinning (ES) is a convenient and versatile method for the fabrication of nanofibers and has been utilized in many fields including pharmaceutical and biomedical applications. Conventional ES uses a needle spinneret for the generation of nanofibers and is associated with many limitations and drawbacks (i.e., needle clogging, limited production capacity, and low yield). Needleless electrospinning (NLES) has been proposed to overcome these problems. Within the last two decades (2004–2020), many research articles have been published reporting the use of NLES for the fabrication of polymeric nanofibers intended for drug delivery and biomedical tissue engineering applications. The objective of the present mini-review article is to elucidate the potential of NLES for designing such novel nanofibrous drug delivery systems and tissue engineering constructs. This paper also gives an overview of the key NLES approaches, including the most recently introduced NLES method: ultrasound-enhanced electrospinning (USES). The technologies underlying NLES systems and an evaluation of electrospun nanofibers are presented. Even though NLES is a promising approach for the industrial production of nanofibers, it is a multivariate process, and more research work is needed to elucidate its full potential and limitations.

Many articles have been published in the last two decades demonstrating improvement in the dissolution and absorption of low solubility drugs when formulated into self-emulsifying drug delivery systems (SEDDS). Several such pharmaceutical products have appeared in the market for medium dose (Neoral® for Cyclsoprin A, Kaletra® for Lopinavir and Ritonavir), or low dose medications (Rocaltrol® for Calcitriol and Avodart® for Dutasteride). However, these are in the form of viscous liquids or semisolid presentations, characterized by the disadvantages of high production cost, stability problems and the requirement of large quantities of surfactants. Solid SEDDS (S-SEDDS), as coarse powders, granules or pellets, besides solubility improvement, can be filled easily into capsules or processed into tablets providing a handy dosage form with instant release, which can be further developed into controlled release by mixing with suitable polymers or coating with polymeric films. In this review, the materials used for the preparation of S-SEDDS, their properties and role in the formulations are detailed. Factors affecting the physical characteristics, mechanical properties of S-SEDDS as well as their in vitro release and in vivo absorption are discussed. The mechanisms involved in the formation of instant and sustained release self-emulsifying granules or pellets are elucidated. Relationships are demonstrated between the characteristics of S-SEDDS units (size, shape, mechanical properties, re-emulsification ability, drug migration and drug release) and the properties of the submicron emulsions used as massing liquids, with the aim to further elucidate the formation mechanisms. The influence of the composition of the powdered ingredients forming the granule or pellet on the properties of S-SEDDS is also examined. Examples of formulations of S-SEDDS that have been reported in the literature in the last thirteen years (2004–2017) are presented.

No abstract

The aim of this contribution was to evaluate the impact of processing methods and polymeric carriers on the physicochemical properties of solid dispersions of the poorly soluble drug progesterone (PG). Five polymers: hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC), hydroxypropyl methylcellulose acetate succinate (HPMCAS), microcrystalline cellulose (MCC), polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) and silica (SiO2), and two processing methods: solvent evaporation (SE) and mechano-chemical activation by co-milling (BM) were applied. H-bonding was demonstrated by FTIR spectra as clear shifting of drug peaks at 1707 cm−1 (C20 carbonyl) and 1668 cm−1 (C3 carbonyl). Additionally, spectroscopic and thermal analysis revealed the presence of unstable PG II polymorphic form and a second heating DSC cycle, the presence of another polymorph possibly assigned to form III, but their influence on drug solubility was not apparent. Except for PG–MCC, solid dispersions improved drug solubility compared to physical mixtures. For SE dispersions, an inverse relationship was found between drug water solubility and drug–polymer Hansen solubility parameter difference (Δδt), whereas for BM dispersions, the solubility was influenced by both the intermolecular interactions and the polymer Tg. Solubility improvement with SE was demonstrated for all except PG–MCC dispersions, whereas improvement with BM was demonstrated by the PG–HPMC, PG–PVP and PG–HPMCAS dispersions, the last showing impressive increase from 34.21 to 82.13 μg/mL. The extensive H-bonding between PG and HPMCAS was proved by FTIR analysis of the dispersion in the liquid state. In conclusion, although SE improved drug solubility, BM gave more than twice greater improvement. This indicates that directly operating intermolecular forces are more efficient than the solvent mediated.

No abstract