opportunistic detection of a clinically unsuspected aneurysm during clinical examination or investigation for another reason is the most common way the diagnosis of an AAA is made. Almost half of the aneurysms were diagnosed clinically, but physical examination also missed more than a third of those detected radiologically. Despite technological advancement, clinical examination still plays a paramount role in the detection of AAAs. Larger AAAs are usually palpable and more likely to be detected on clinical examination.

A comparison of outcomes based on a scoring system for assessments, described by Rosén and Lundborg, after sharp complete laceration of median and/or ulnar nerves at various levels in the forearm was carried out. There were 66 males (90.4%) and 7 females (9.6%), with a mean age of 31 years (range: 14-62 years). The patients were categorized into three groups according to the type of nerve injury. The median nerve was injured in 25 cases (group M, 34.3%), the ulnar in 27 (group U, 36.9%), and both the nerves in 21 (group MU, 28.8%). The demographic data of the patients and the mechanism of injury were recorded. We also examined the employment status at the time of the injury and we estimated the percentage of patients who returned to their work after trauma. In all cases, a primary epineural repair was performed. Concomitant injuries were repaired in the same setting. The mean period of time between injury and surgery was 5.3 hours (range: 2-120 hours). A rehabilitation protocol and a reeducation program were followed in all cases. The mean follow-up was 3 years (range: 2-6 years), with more distal injuries having a shorter follow-up period. The total score was 2.71 in group M (range: 0.79-2.99) and 2.63 in group U (range: 0.63-3), with no significant differences observed. There was a significant difference between these two groups and group MU (total score 2.03, range: 0.49-2.76, P = 0.02). Up to the last follow-up, 61 patients (83.5%) had returned to their previous work. The Rosén-Lundborg model can be a useful and simple tool for the evaluation of the functional outcome after nerve injury and repair temporally reflecting the processes of regeneration and reinnervation.

Introdução A eletroconvulsoterapia (ECT) é um tratamento efetivo para certos subgrupos de indivíduos que sofrem de doenças mentais graves. Tais subgrupos consistem primariamente de pacientes com transtornos depressivos graves, catatonia, mania e, ocasionalmente, certos pacientes com esquizofrenia. Dependendo da ocorrência de comorbidades com desordens médicas e/ou neurológicas e da análise de risco em relação à necessidade do tratamento, a ECT pode ser tida tanto como procedimento de baixo como de alto risco. A ECT deve ser sempre administrada seguindo informações válidas, com o consentimento do paciente e em concordância com os procedimentos de sua administração. O objetivo deste artigo é mostrar a evidente eficácia e a segurança da ECT no tratamento da depressão e de outras doenças psiquiátricas, bem como determinar o seu uso combinado à farmacoterapia e estabelecer recomendações para a sua prática. Desordens depressivasA introdução da ECT no tratamento de doenças depressivas graves foi uma das intervenções mais dramáticas da psiquiatria. Esse é evidentemente o tratamento mais eficiente para as depressões graves, em comparação a todas as outras modalidades terapêuticas, e é tão seguro quanto o tratamento farmacológico.

We studied 140 patients with femoral neck fractures treated from January 1999 to December 2006. There were 68 men and 72 women with a mean age of 72 years (range 60–80 years). Seventy patients were treated with closed reduction and internal fixation (group A), and 70 patients with hip arthroplasty (group B). The duration of surgery, length of hospitalization, complications, postoperative Harris hip score, and need for reoperation were recorded. Group B had significantly higher blood loss, increased surgical time and length of hospitalization compared to group A patients. The Harris hip score was significantly higher in group B at the 3, 6, and 12-month follow-up evaluations; however, the differences were no longer significant at the 24-month evaluation. The overall complications rate was 18.6% (13 patients) in group A compared to 25.7% (18 patients) in group B; this was not statistically significant (P = 0.309). A statistically significant difference was found regarding reoperation rate in group A (11.4%, eight patients) compared to group B (1.4%, one patient) (P = 0.016). Arthroplasty compared to internal fixation for displaced femoral neck fractures is associated with a significantly higher functional score and lower risk of reoperation at the cost of greater infection rates, blood loss, and operative time.

No abstract