Aim: To evaluate the uptake of screening colonoscopy among physicians as compared to the general population. Methods: Asymptomatic physicians, aged 45–67 years, at average risk for colorectal cancer (CRC), working in the participating National Health System hospitals were asked to complete a questionnaire regarding the uptake of screening colonoscopy. The results were compared to those in a background healthy population, aged 50–75 years, inhabitants of a Greek county, who were offered a free access to a screening colonoscopy program for CRC. High-risk adenomas were those ≥10 mm in diameter or any adenoma, regardless of size, with villous histology or high-grade dysplasia. Results: Overall, 267 of 782 physicians and 402 of 6,534 nonphysicians underwent a screening colonoscopy (uptake rates 34.2 and 6.2% respectively, p = 0.00001). Screening colonoscopy has yielded 4 adenocarcinomas (1.6%), 14 high-risk adenomas (5.5%), and 61 low-risk adenomas (25.7%) in the physicians’ group. Corresponding figures in the nonphysician arm were 4 (1), 26 (6.5), and 107 (26.6%), respectively. The main reason among physicians for nonadherence was indifference/negligence (n = 213). Conclusion: The proportion of physicians undergoing screening colonoscopy for CRC is significantly higher compared to the general population; however, it does remain suboptimal.
Background
Vedolizumab is a monoclonal antibody against the gut-homing integrin α4β7 that is being used for the treatment of moderate to severe Ulcerative Colitis (UC) and Crohn’s Disease (CD). An increasing number of studies have reported new onset or reactivation of extra-intestinal manifestations (EIMs), among which arthralgia is the most prominent.
Methods
We aimed to study the incidence, characteristics and possible predictors of arthralgia development in patients under treatment with Vedolizumab, in a retrospective cohort study in 3 IBD centers in Athens, Greece. UC and CD patients treated with Vedolizumab (n=115, men=50.4%, UC=70.4%, median duration of follow-up=9 months) or Infliximab (n=93, men=69.9%, UC=29%, median duration of follow-up=29.1 months) were recruited. For each participant the entry point for the study was the first day of drug administration while the endpoint was either the day of arthralgia occurrence, the day of drug discontinuation or the day of the last interview if the patient was still receiving the drug. The SPSS-23 statistical program was used for analysis.
Results
Patients under Vedolizumab were at higher risk for new-onset (HR=4.76, P=0.001) and recurrent (HR=5.41, P=0.003) arthralgia compared to patients under Infliximab. New-onset arthralgia occurred in 20.9% while recurrent in 37.8% of 45 patients with a history of articular EIM. New-onset and recurrent arthralgias differed in certain characteristics. New-onset arthralgia involved peripheral joints in 91.7%, was milder, occurred shortly after Vedolizumab initiation (median drug exposure= 3 months, IQR=5 months) in patients in remission and remitted in 50% of cases. In multivariate Cox’s proportional-hazards model new-onset arthralgia was significantly associated with extensive colitis (HR=2.91, 95%CI=1.04-8.12). Of 15 patients with concomitant treatment of azathioprine no one manifested new-onset arthralgia (X2 P= 0.03, Fisher’s exact test P=0.038). Similarly, no patient with a history of appendectomy manifested new-onset arthralgia (n=12, X2 P= 0.067, Fisher’s exact test P=0.12). No predictors were identified for recurrent arthralgia. No patients discontinued vedolizumab due to arthralgia.
Conclusion
Vedolizumab treatment may be associated with the temporal manifestation of arthralgias. Patients under Vedolizumab with extensive ulcerative colitis have a higher risk of developing new-onset arthralgia, whereas, concomitant treatment with azathioprine and a history of appendectomy appears to have a prophylactic effect. This effect could be indicative of a distinct pathophysiological lymphocyte-mediated mechanism.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.