Clinical animal cytogenetics development began in the 1960’s, almost at the same time as human cytogenetics. However, the development of the two disciplines has been very different during the last four decades. Clinical animal cytogenetics reached its ‘Golden Age’ at the end of the 1980’s. The majority of the laboratories, as well as the main screening programs in farm animal species, presented in this review, were implemented during that period, under the guidance of some historical leaders, the first of whom was Ingemar Gustavsson. Over the past 40 years, hundreds of scientific publications reporting original chromosomal abnormalities generally associated with clinical disorders (mainly fertility impairment) have been published. Since the 1980’s, the number of scientists involved in clinical animal cytogenetics has drastically decreased for different reasons and the activities in that field are now concentrated in only a few laboratories (10 to 15, mainly in Europe), some of which have become highly specialized. Currently between 8,000 and 10,000 chromosomal analyses are carried out each year worldwide, mainly in cattle, pigs, and horses. About half of these analyses are performed in one French laboratory. Accurate estimates of the prevalence of chromosomal abnormalities in some populations are now available. For instance, one phenotypically normal pig in 200 controlled in France carries a structural chromosomal rearrangement. The frequency of the widespread 1;29 Robertsonian translocation in cattle has greatly decreased in most countries, but remains rather high in certain breeds (up to 20–25% in large beef cattle populations, even higher in some local breeds). The continuation, and in some instances the development of the chromosomal screening programs in farm animal populations allowed the implementation of new and original scientific projects, aimed at exploring some basic questions in the fields of chromosome and/or cell biology, thanks to easier access to interesting biological materials (germ cells, gametes, embryos ...).

Prolactin is an anterior pituitary peptide hormone involved in many different endocrine activities and is essential for reproductive performance. This action is mediated by its receptor, the prolactin receptor, encoded by the PRLR gene. In this study, we sequenced and characterized the Mediterranean river buffalo PRLR gene (from exon 3 to 10), and we found remarkable genetic diversity. In particular, we found 24 intronic polymorphisms and 13 exonic SNPs, seven of which were non-synonymous. Furthermore, the polymorphisms identified in the 3'-UTR were investigated to establish their possible influence on microRNA binding sites. Considering all the amino acid changes and the observed allelic combinations, it is possible to deduce at least six different translations of the buffalo prolactin receptor and, consequently, the presence at the PRLR gene of at least six alleles. Furthermore, we identified a deletion of a CACTACC heptamer between nucleotides 1102 and 1103 of exon 10 (3'-UTR), and we developed an allele-specific PCR to identify the carriers of this genetic marker. Finally, the SNP g.11188A>G, detected in exon 10 and responsible for the amino acid replacement p.His328Arg, was genotyped in 308 Italian Mediterranean river buffaloes, and an association study with milk fat traits was carried out. The statistical analysis showed a tendency that approached significance for the AA genotype with higher contents of odd branched-chain fatty acids. Thus, our results suggest that the PRLR gene is a good candidate for gene association studies with qualitative traits related to buffalo milk production.

Buffalo DGAT1 (diacylglycerol O-acyltransferase 1) was mainly investigated for the characterization of the gene itself and for the identification of the K232A polymorphism, similar to what has been accomplished in cattle, although no information has been reported so far at the mRNA level. The importance of DGAT1 for lipid metabolism led us to investigate the transcript profiles of lactating buffaloes characterized as high (9.13 ± 0.23) and low (7.94 ± 0.29) for milk fat percentage, and to explore the genetic diversity at the RNA and DNA level. A total of 336 positive clones for the DGAT1 cDNA were analyzed by PCR and chosen for sequencing according to the differences in length. The clone assembling revealed a very complex mRNA pattern with a total of 21 transcripts differently represented in the 2 groups of animals. Apart from the correct transcript (17 exons long), the skipping of exon 12 is the most significant in terms of distribution of clones with 11.6% difference between the 2 groups, whereas a totally different mRNA profile was found in approximately 12% of clones. The sequencing of genomic DNA allowed the identification of 10 polymorphic sites at the intron level, which clarify, at least partially, the genetic events behind the production of complex mRNA. Genetic diversity was found also at the exon level. The single nucleotide polymorphism c.1053C>T represents the first example of polymorphism in a coding region for the DGAT1 in the Italian Mediterranean breed. To establish whether this polymorphism is present in other buffalo breeds, a quick method based on PCR-RFLP was set up for allelic discrimination in the Italian Mediterranean and the Romanian Murrah (200 animals in total). The alleles were equally represented in the overall population, whereas the analysis of the 2 breeds showed different frequencies, likely indicating diverse genetic structure of the 2 breeds. The T allele might be considered as the ancestral condition of the DGAT1 gene, being present in the great part of the sequenced species. These data add knowledge at the transcript and genetic levels for the buffalo DGAT1 and open the opportunity for further investigation of other genes involved in milk fat metabolism for the river buffalo, including the future possibility of selecting alleles with quantitative or qualitative favorable effects (or both).

No abstract

Synchronized peripheral blood lymphocytes from both river buffalo (BBU) and sheep (OAR) were treated for late incorporation of both BrdU and H-33258 to obtain R-banded preparations to be used for FISH-mapping. Ovine BAC-clones were hybridized for three days on slides pre-exposed to UV light after H-33258 staining. The following loci were mapped: GPR103 (BBU7q13, OAR6q13), TRAM1L1(OAR6q13dist), PPP3CA (BBU7q21, OAR6q15), SNCA (OAR6q17), PPARGC1A(BBU7q23, OAR6q17), UGDH (BBU7q25prox, OAR6q22prox), KDR (BBU7q27, OAR6q22), CNOT6L (BBU7q32prox, OAR6q32prox), NUP54 (BBU7q32, BBU6q32), DMP1 (BBU7q34dist-q36prox, OAR6q34dist-q36prox), QDPR (BBU7q36, OAR6q36). All loci mapped in homoeologous chromosomes and chromosome bands of the two species and their locations are in agreement with the previous RH-mapping performed on BBU7 with some difference in the distal region of BBU7. However, the present cytogenetic map better anchors the RH-map on specific river buffalo chromosome bands. In addition, eleven loci were assigned for the first time in sheep to OAR6, noticeably extending the cytogenetic map on this important chromosome which encodes caseins. Two loci (TRAM1L1 and SNCA) mapped in sheep were unmapped in river buffalo in three different FISH experiments. Comparisons between integrated cytogenetic maps of BBU7/OAR6 (and BTA6) with human chromosome 4 (HSA4) revealed complex chromosome rearrangements differentiating these chromosomes.