In this work, comparative studies on DNA-PNA and polyarginine-conjugated DNA-PNA duplexes unzipping inside the α-hemolysin nanopore (α-HL) are presented. We identified significant differences in the blockade currents, as the applied voltage across the nanopore facilitated the duplex capture inside the nanopore’s vestibule against the constriction region, subsequent cDNA strand insertion inside the nanopore’s β-barrel past the constriction site, its complete unzip from the duplex, and translocation. We observed that inside the voltage-biased nanopore, polyarginine-conjugated DNA-PNA duplexes dehybridize faster than their DNA-PNA counterparts and proposed a model to describe the duplex unzipping. This study identifies key particularities of DNA-PNA duplex unzipping as it takes place inside the nanopore and being preceded by entrapment in the vestibule domain of the α-HL. Our results are a crucial step toward understanding the nucleic acids duplexes unzipping kinetics variability, in confined, variable geometries.

Fast, cheap and easy to use nucleic acids detection methods are crucial to mitigate adverse impacts caused by various pathogens, and are essential in forensic investigations, food safety monitoring or evolution of infectious diseases. We report here a method based on the α-hemolysin (α-HL) nanopore, working in conjunction to unmodified citrate anion-coated gold nanoparticles (AuNPs), to detect nanomolar concentrations of short single-stranded DNA sequences (ssDNA). The core idea was to use charge neutral peptide nucleic acids (PNA) as hybridization probe for complementary target ssDNAs, and monitor at the single-particle level the PNA-induced aggregation propensity AuNPs during PNA–DNA duplexes formation, by recording ionic current blockades signature of AuNP–α-HL interactions. This approach offers advantages including: (1) a simple to operate platform, producing clear-cut readout signals based on distinct size differences of PNA-induced AuNPs aggregates, in relation to the presence in solution of complementary ssDNAs to the PNA fragments (2) sensitive and selective detection of target ssDNAs (3) specific ssDNA detection in the presence of interference DNA, without sample labeling or signal amplification. The powerful synergy of protein nanopore-based nanoparticle detection and specific PNA–DNA hybridization introduces a new strategy for nucleic acids biosensing with short detection time and label-free operation.

The implication of nanopores as versatile components in dedicated biosensors, nanoreactors, or miniaturized sequencers has considerably advanced single-molecule investigative science in a wide range of disciplines, ranging from molecular medicine and nanoscale chemistry to biophysics and ecology. Here, we employed the nanopore tweezing technique to capture amino acid-functionalized peptide nucleic acids (PNAs) with α-hemolysin-based nanopores and correlated the ensuing stochastic fluctuations of the ionic current through the nanopore with the composition and order of bases in the PNAs primary structure. We demonstrated that while the system enables the detection of distinct bases on homopolymeric PNA or triplet bases on heteropolymeric strands, it also reveals rich insights into the conformational dynamics of the entrapped PNA within the nanopore, relevant for perfecting the recognition capability of single-molecule sequencing.

Real-time monitoring, simple operation, and cheaper methods for detecting immunological proteins hold the potential for a solid influence on proteomics and human biology, as they can promote the onset of timely diagnoses and adequate treatment protocols. In this work we present an exploratory study suggesting the applicability of resistive-pulse sensing technology in conjunction with the α-hemolysin (α-HL) protein nanopore, for the detection of the chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) e-antigen (HBeAg). In this approach, the recognition between HBeAg and a purified monoclonal hepatitis B e antibody (Ab(HBeAg)) was detected via transient ionic current spikes generated by partial occlusions of the α-HL nanopore by protein aggregates electrophoretically driven toward the nanopore’s vestibule entrance. Despite the steric hindrance precluding antigen, antibody, or antigen–antibody complex capture inside the nanopore, their stochastic bumping with the nanopore generated clear transient blockade events. The subsequent analysis suggested the detection of protein subpopulations in solution, rendering the approach a potentially valuable label-free platform for the sensitive, submicromolar-scale screening of HBeAg targets.

To alleviate solubility‐related shortcomings associated with the use of neutral peptide nucleic acids (PNA), a powerful strategy is incorporate various charged sidechains onto the PNA structure. Here we employ a single‐molecule technique and prove that the ionic current blockade signature of free poly(Arg)‐PNAs and their corresponding duplexes with target ssDNAs interacting with a single α‐hemolysin (α‐HL) nanopore is highly ionic strength dependent, with high salt‐containing electrolytes facilitating both capture and isolation of such complexes. Our data illustrate the effect of low ionic strength in reducing the effective volume of free poly(Arg)‐PNAs and augmentation of their electrophoretic mobility while traversing the nanopore. We found that unlike in high salt electrolytes, the specific hybridization of cationic moiety‐containing PNAs with complementary negatively charged ssDNAs in a salt concentration as low as 0.5 M is dramatically impeded. We suggest a scenario in which reduced charge screening by counterions in low salt electrolytes enables non‐specific, electrostatic interactions with the anionic backbone of polynucleotides, thus reducing the ability of PNA‐DNA complementary association via hydrogen bonding patterns. We applied an experimental strategy with spatially‐separated poly(Arg)‐PNAs and ssDNAs, and present evidence at the single‐molecule level suggestive of the real‐time, long‐range interactions‐driven formation of poly(Arg)‐PNA‐DNA complexes, as individual strands entering the nanopore from opposite directions collide inside a nanocavity.