BackgroundMultiple preclinical studies have highlighted AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) as a potential therapeutic target for autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD). Both metformin and canagliflozin indirectly activate AMPK by inhibiting mitochondrial function, while salsalate is a direct AMPK activator. Metformin, canagliflozin and salsalate (a prodrug dimer of salicylate) are approved for clinical use with excellent safety profile. Although metformin treatment had been shown to attenuate experimental cystic kidney disease, there are concerns that therapeutic AMPK activation in human kidney might require a higher oral metformin dose than can be achieved clinically.MethodsIn this study, we tested metformin-based combination therapies for their additive (metformin plus canagliflozin) and synergistic (metformin plus salsalate) effects and each drug individually in an adult-onset conditional Pkd1 knock-out mouse model (n = 20 male/group) using dosages expected to yield clinically relevant drug levels.FindingsCompared to untreated mutant mice, treatment with salsalate or metformin plus salsalate improved kidney survival (i.e. blood urea nitrogen <20 mmol/L at the time of sacrifice) and reduced cystic kidney disease severity. However, the effects of metformin plus salsalate did not differ from salsalate alone; and neither metformin nor canagliflozin was effective. Protein expression and phosphorylation analyses indicated that salsalate treatment was associated with reduction in mTOR (mammalian target of rapamycin) activity and cellular proliferation in Pkd1 mutant mouse kidneys. Global gene expression analyses suggested that these effects were linked to restoration of mitochondrial function and suppression of inflammation and fibrosis.InterpretationSalsalate is a highly promising candidate for drug repurposing and clinical testing in ADPKD.

Introduction Discordance in kidney disease severity between affected relatives is a recognized feature of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD). Here, we report a systematic study of a large cohort of families to define the prevalence and clinical features of intrafamilial discordance in ADPKD. Methods The extended Toronto Genetic Epidemiology Study of Polycystic Kidney Disease (eTGESP) cohort includes 1390 patients from 612 unrelated families with ADPKD ascertained in a regional polycystic kidney disease center. All probands underwent comprehensive PKD1 and PKD2 mutation screening. Total kidney volume by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was available in 500 study patients. Results Based on (i) rate of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decline, (ii) age at onset of end-stage renal disease (ESRD), and (iii) Mayo Clinic Imaging Classification (MCIC), 20% of patients were classified as having mild disease, and 33% as having severe disease. Intrafamilial ADPKD discordance with at least 1 mild and 1 severe case was observed in 43 of 371 (12%) families, at a similar frequency regardless of the responsible gene ( PKD1/PKD2/ no mutation detected) or mutation type (protein-truncating versus nontruncating). Intrafamilial discordance was more common in larger families and was present in 30% of families with more than 5 affected members. The heritability of age at onset of ESRD was similar between different mutation types. Conclusion Extreme kidney disease discordance is present in at least 12% of families with ADPKD, regardless of the underlying mutated gene or mutation class. Delineating genetic and environmental modifiers underlying the observed intrafamilial ADPKD variability will provide novel insights into the mechanisms of progression in ADPKD.

Purpose of review: Infections are a major contributor to morbidity and mortality in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients. A better understanding of the interplay between infectious processes and ESRD may eventually lead to the development of targeted treatment strategies aimed at lowering overall disease morbidity and mortality. Monogenic causes are a major contributor to the development of adult chronic kidney disease (CKD). Recent studies identified a genetic cause in 10% to 20% of adults with CKD. With the introduction of whole-exome sequencing (WES) into clinical mainstay, this proportion is expected to increase in the future. Once patients develop CKD/ESRD due to a genetic cause, secondary changes, such as a compromised immune status, affect overall disease progression and clinical outcomes. Stratification according to genotype may enable us to study its effects on secondary disease outcomes, such as infectious risk. Moreover, this knowledge will enable us to better understand the molecular interplay between primary disease and secondary disease outcomes. Sources of information: We conducted a literature review using search engines such as PubMed, PubMed central, and Medline, as well as cumulative knowledge from our respective areas of expertise. Methods: This is a transdisciplinary perspective on infectious complications in ESRD due to monogenic causes, such as autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD), combining expertise in genomics and immunology. Key findings: In ADPKD, infection is a frequent complication manifesting primarily as lower urinary tract infection and less frequently as renal infection. Infectious episodes may be a direct consequence of a specific underlying structural abnormality, for example the characteristic cysts, among others. However, evidence suggests that infectious disease risk is also increased in ESRD due to secondary not-well-understood disease mechanisms. These disease mechanisms may vary depending on the underlying nature of the primary disease. While the infectious disease risk is well documented in ADPKD, there are currently insufficient data on the risk in other monogenic causes of ESRD. WES in combination with novel technologies, such as RNA sequencing and single-cell RNA sequencing, can provide insight into the molecular mechanisms of disease progression in different monogenic causes of CKD/ESRD and may lead to the development of novel risk-stratification profiles in the future. Limitations: This is not a systematic review of the literature and the proposed perspective is tainted by the authors’ point of view on the topic. Implications: WES in combination with novel technologies such as RNA sequencing may enable us to fully unravel underlying disease mechanisms and secondary disease outcomes in monogenic causes of CKD and better characterize individual risk profiles. This understanding will hopefull...