Background and objective: Hypotension and bradycardia are the most common hemodynamic disorders and side effects of spinal anesthesia (SA) on the cardiovascular system. SA-induced sympathetic denervation causes peripheral vasodilatation and redistribution of central blood volume that may lead to decreased venous return to the heart. The aim of the study was to evaluate the changes of inferior vena cava collapsibility index (IVC-CI) during SA in spontaneously breathing patients during elective knee joint replacement surgery to prognose manifestation of intraoperative hypotension and bradycardia. Materials and methods: 60 patients (American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I or II, no clinically significant cardiovascular pathology) of both sexes undergoing elective knee joint replacement surgery under SA were included in the prospective study. Inspiratory and expiratory inferior vena cava (IVCin, IVCex) diameters were measured using an ultrasound device in supine position before and immediately after SA, then 15 min, 30 min, and 45 min after SA was performed. The heart rate, along with systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial blood pressures were collected. The parameters were measured at the baseline and at the next four time points. Results: There were no significant changes in IVCin, IVCex, and IVC-CI compared to baseline and other time point measurements in hypotensive versus nonhypotensive and bradycardic versus nonbradycardic patients (p > 0.05). Changes in IVC diameter do not prognose hypotension and/or bradycardia during SA: the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for IVC-CI at all measuring points was <0.7, p > 0.05. Conclusions: Reduction in IVC diameters and increase in IVC-CI do not predict hypotension and bradycardia during SA in spontaneously breathing patients undergoing elective knee joint replacement surgery.

The study was performed at the Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology of the Kauno Klinikos Hospital of Lithuanian University of Health Sciences. Background. Intravascular fluids are empirically administered to prevent hypotension induced by spinal anaesthesia. Ultrasound measurements of the inferior vena cava (IVC) and the IVC collapsibility index (IVC-CI) is a non-invasive method to evaluate the intravascular volume status. The aim of the study was to identify the prognostic value of the IVC collapsibility index in spontaneously breathing patients to predict severe intraoperative hypotension. Materials and methods. Sixty patients undergoing elective knee arthroplasty under spinal anaesthesia were included in the prospective study. The diameters of IVCex, IVCin, and IVC-CI were measured before and 15 min after spinal anaesthesia when administration of 500 ml of normal saline using infusion pump was finished. The haemodynamic parameters (heart rate, systolic, diastolic, and mean blood pressures, breathing rate) were collected. Results. Severe arterial hypotension was noticed in 18.3% of the patients. No statistically significant differences were detected between changes in IVCex, IVCin, and IVC-CI comparing hypotensive and non-hypotensive patients at the baseline and after the interventions (p > 0.005). According to receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, IVC-CI is not effective in the prediction of severe hypotension during spinal anaesthesia in spontaneously breathing patients: the area under the ROC curve for IVC-CI was 0.05. Conclusions. IVC-CI is not an effective predictor of severe hypotension after induction of spinal anaesthesia followed by normal saline administration in spontaneously breathing patients undergoing elective knee arthroplasty. More trials, including different patient subgroups, will be needed.

Background Methods of pain management that have less effect on motor function after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are needed to ensure early mobilization. We investigated whether the distal femoral triangle and distal adductor canal blocks are superior to the femoral nerve block regarding motor blockade at early postoperative hours. Material/Methods Patients scheduled for TKA under spinal anesthesia were blindly assigned into 2 groups. One group received the distal femoral triangle and distal adductor canal blocks and the other group received the femoral nerve block. In both groups, at 3, 6, 24, and 48 h after surgery motor blockade was evaluated with the Bromage scale. Secondary outcomes such as pain control efficacy and patient satisfaction were evaluated at 6, 24, and 48 h postoperatively using either the VAS scale or a 10-point scale. Results We analyzed the outcomes of 77 patients. Better motor function at 3 and 6 h after TKA was observed in the distal femoral triangle and the distal adductor canal blocks group (37.7% vs 23.4%, p=0.032 and 49.4% vs 32.5%, p=0.002, respectively). At 24 h after the surgery, patients from the femoral nerve block group consumed significantly more rescue opioid analgesics (p=0.016). We found no significant differences in pain intensity and patient satisfaction at any timepoints after the surgery. Conclusions The distal femoral triangle and distal adductor canal blocks resulted in significantly better motor function at the first 3 and 6 h after total knee arthroplasty. At 24 h after surgery, rescue opioid doses in the femoral nerve block group were significantly higher.

Background. The aim of the study was to identify the accuracy of and agreement between two non-invasive haemodynamic monitoring techniques in the perioperative setting – thoracic electrical bioimpedance (TEB) and Edwards Lifesciences ClearSight system (CS). Materials and methods. The study included ten patients. Parametric quantitative data were expressed as mean ± SD. The ShapiroWilk test was used to test the normality of the distributions. A linear regression model was used to measure the strength of the linear relationship between TEB and CS. Bland-Altman analysis was performed to assess the mean difference, precision, and the limits of agreements (LOA). The Critchley and Critchley method was used to calculate the percentage error (PE), and if

Conclusions:1) Preoperative evaluation in Lithuanian hospitals is done by a doctor anaesthesiologist, mostly 2 hours or less before the surgery, using standardized questionnaires. 2) Patients with comorbidities and/or taking medication before surgery are evaluated and prepared according to the ESA recommendations in most of LHs. However, some recommendations related to smoking cessation, the assessment of obese patients, usage of herbal preparations, are performed in a small number of LHs. 3) Airway evaluation is done in most of LHs according to ESA recommendations.