Mitotic bookmarking transcription factors (BFs) maintain the capacity to bind to their targets during mitosis, despite major rearrangements of the chromatin. While they were thought to propagate gene regulatory information through mitosis by statically occupying their DNA targets, it has recently become clear that BFs are highly dynamic in mitotic cells. This represents both a technical and a conceptual challenge to study and understand the function of BFs: First, formaldehyde has been suggested to be unable to efficiently capture these transient interactions, leading to profound contradictions in the literature; and second, if BFs are not permanently bound to their targets during mitosis, it becomes unclear how they convey regulatory information to daughter cells. Here, comparing formaldehyde to alternative fixatives we clarify the nature of the chromosomal association of previously proposed BFs in embryonic stem cells: While ESRRB can be considered as a canonical BF that binds at selected regulatory regions in mitosis, SOX2 and POU5F1 (also known as OCT4) establish DNA sequence-independent interactions with the mitotic chromosomes, either throughout the chromosomal arms (SOX2) or at pericentromeric regions (POU5F1). Moreover, we show that ordered nucleosomal arrays are retained during mitosis at ESRRB bookmarked sites, whereas regions losing transcription factor binding display a profound loss of order. By maintaining nucleosome positioning during mitosis, ESRRB might ensure the rapid post-mitotic re-establishment of functional regulatory complexes at selected enhancers and promoters. Our results provide a mechanistic framework that reconciles dynamic mitotic binding with the transmission of gene regulatory information across cell division.

Alternative pre-mRNA splicing is a highly cell type-specific process essential to generating protein diversity. However, the mechanisms responsible for the establishment and maintenance of heritable cell-specific alternative-splicing programs are poorly understood. Recent observations point to a role of histone modifications in the regulation of alternative splicing. Here we report a new mechanism of chromatin-mediated splicing control involving a long noncoding RNA (lncRNA). We have identified an evolutionarily conserved nuclear antisense lncRNA, generated from within the human FGFR2 locus, that promotes epithelial-specific alternative splicing of FGFR2. The lncRNA acts through recruitment of Polycomb-group proteins and the histone demethylase KDM2a to create a chromatin environment that impairs binding of a repressive chromatin-splicing adaptor complex important for mesenchymal-specific splicing. Our results uncover a new function for lncRNAs in the establishment and maintenance of cell-specific alternative splicing via modulation of chromatin signatures.

The access of Transcription Factors (TFs) to their cognate DNA binding motifs requires a precise control over nucleosome positioning. This is especially important following DNA replication and during mitosis, both resulting in profound changes in nucleosome organization over TF binding regions. Using mouse Embryonic Stem (ES) cells, we show that the TF CTCF displaces nucleosomes from its binding site and locally organizes large and phased nucleosomal arrays, not only in interphase steady-state but also immediately after replication and during mitosis. Correlative analyses suggest this is associated with fast gene reactivation following replication and mitosis. While regions bound by other TFs (Oct4/Sox2), display major rearrangement, the post-replication and mitotic nucleosome positioning activity of CTCF is not unique: Esrrb binding regions are also characterized by persistent nucleosome positioning. Therefore, selected TFs such as CTCF and Esrrb act as resilient TFs governing the inheritance of nucleosome positioning at regulatory regions throughout the cell-cycle.

The changes imposed on the nucleus, chromatin and its regulators during mitosis lead to the dismantlement of most gene regulatory processes. However, an increasing number of transcriptional regulators are being identified as capable of binding their genomic targets during mitosis. These so-called 'mitotic bookmarking factors' encompass transcription factors and chromatin modifiers that are believed to convey gene regulatory information from mother to daughter cells. In this Primer, we review mitotic bookmarking processes in development and stem cells and discuss the interest and potential importance of this concept with regard to epigenetic regulation and cell fate transitions involving cellular proliferation.

At the kilo- to megabase pair scales, eukaryotic genomes are partitioned into self-interacting modules or topologically associated domains (TADs) that associate to form nuclear compartments. Here, we combine high-content super-resolution microscopies with state-of-the-art DNA-labeling methods to reveal the variability in the multiscale organization of the Drosophila genome. We find that association frequencies within TADs and between TAD borders are below ~10%, independently of TAD size, epigenetic state, or cell type. Critically, despite this large heterogeneity, we are able to visualize nanometer-sized epigenetic domains at the single-cell level. In addition, absolute contact frequencies within and between TADs are to a large extent defined by genomic distance, higher-order chromosome architecture, and epigenetic identity. We propose that TADs and compartments are organized by multiple, small-frequency, yet specific interactions that are regulated by epigenetics and transcriptional state.

Transcription factor networks, together with histone modifications and signalling pathways, underlie the establishment and maintenance of gene regulatory architectures associated with the molecular identity of each cell type. However, how master transcription factors individually impact the epigenomic landscape and orchestrate the behaviour of regulatory networks under different environmental constraints is only partially understood. Here, we show that the transcription factor Nanog deploys multiple distinct mechanisms to enhance embryonic stem cell self-renewal. In the presence of LIF, which fosters self-renewal, Nanog rewires the pluripotency network by promoting chromatin accessibility and binding of other pluripotency factors to thousands of enhancers. In the absence of LIF, Nanog blocks differentiation by sustaining H3K27me3, a repressive histone mark, at developmental regulators. Among those, we show that the repression of Otx2 plays a preponderant role. Our results underscore the versatility of master transcription factors, such as Nanog, to globally influence gene regulation during developmental processes.

26At the kilo-to mega-base pair scales, eukaryotic genomes are partitioned into 27 self-interacting modules or topologically associated domains (TADs) that associate to 28 form nuclear compartments. Here, we combined high-content super-resolution 29 microscopies with state-of-the-art DNA labeling methods to reveal the variability in 30 the multiscale organization of the Drosophila genome. We found that association 31 frequencies within TADs and between TAD borders are below ~10%, independently 32 of TAD size, epigenetic state, or cell type. Critically, despite this large heterogeneity, 33 we were able to visualize nanometer-sized epigenetic domains at the single-cell 34 level. In addition, absolute contact frequencies within and between TADs were to a 35 large extent defined by genomic distance, higher-order chromosome architecture, 36 and epigenetic identity. We propose that TADs and compartments are organized by 37 multiple, small frequency, yet specific interactions that are regulated by epigenetics 38 and transcriptional state. 39 40 41 42 43The multi-scale organization of eukaryotic genomes defines and regulates 44 cellular identity and tissue-specific functions [1][2][3] . At the kilo-megabase scales, 45 genomes are partitioned into self-interacting modules or topologically associated 46 domains (TADs) 4-6 . TAD formation seems to require specific looping interactions 47 between TAD borders 7,8 , while the association of TADs can lead to the formation of 48 active/repressed compartments 9 . These structural levels were often seen as highly 49 stable over time, however, recent single-cell Hi-C studies have reported different 50 degrees of heterogeneity 10,11 . Other studies have reported that genomes also display 51 stochasticity in their association with the nuclear lamina 12 , in the formation of 52 chromosome territory neighborhoods 13 , and in gene kissing 14 . However, access to 53 single-cell absolute probability contact measurements between loci and efficient 54 detection of low-frequency, long-range interactions are essential to quantify the 55 stochastic behaviour of chromatin at different scales. 56Here, we combined high-content super-resolution microscopy with state-of-57 the-art DNA labeling methods to reveal the variability in the multiscale organization of 58 chromosomes in different cell-types and developmental stages in Drosophila. 59 Remarkably, we found that stochasticity is present at all levels of chromosome 60 architecture, but is locally modulated by sequence and epigenetic state. Contacts 61 between consecutive TAD borders were infrequent, independently of TAD size, 62 epigenetic state, or cell type. Moreover, long-range contact probabilities between 63 non-consecutive borders, the overall folding of chromosomes, and the clustering of 64 epigenetic domains into active/repressed compartments displayed different degrees 65 of stochasticity that globally depended on cell-type. Overall, our results show that 66 contacts between and within TADs are rare, but can be epigenetical...

The Polycomb and trithorax groups of genes control the maintenance of homeotic gene expression in a variety of organisms. A putative participant in the regulation of this process is the murine RYBP (Ring and YY1 Binding Protein) gene. Sequence comparison between different species has identified the homologous gene in Drosophila, the dRYBP gene. We have investigated whether dRYBP participates in the mechanisms of silencing of homeotic genes expression. We first studied its expression by RNA in situ hybridisation and detected dRYBP expression ubiquitously and throughout development. Moreover, we generated a polyclonal anti-dRYBP antibody that recognises the dRYBP protein. dRYBP protein is nuclear and expressed maternally and ubiquitously throughout development. To study the transcriptional activity of dRYBP, we generated a fusion protein containing the entire dRYBP protein and the GAL4 DNA binding domain. This fusion protein functions, in vivo, as a transcriptional repressor throughout development. Importantly, this repression is dependent on the function of the Polycomb group genes. Furthermore, using the GAL4/UAS system, we have over expressed dRYBP in the haltere and the wing imaginal discs. In the haltere discs, high levels of dRYBP repress the expression of the homeotic Ultrabithorax gene. This repression is Polycomb dependent. In the wing discs, dRYBP over expression produces a variety of phenotypes suggesting the overall miss regulation of the many putative genes affected by high levels of dRYBP. Taking together, our results indicate that dRYBP is able to interact with PcG proteins to repress transcription suggesting that the dRYBP gene might belong to the Polycomb group of genes in Drosophila.