[Purpose] The aim of this study was to use surface electromyography (EMG) to investigate the effects of different foot positioning on bilateral erector spinae (ES) and gluteus maximus (GM) activation during sit-to-stand performed by individuals with stroke. [Subjects] Fifteen randomly selected participants with stroke were enrolled in this study. [Methods] All the participants were asked to perform sit-to-stand (STS) using three different strategies: (1) symmetric foot position, (2) unaffected foot placed behind the affected foot position (asymmetric-1), (3) affected foot placed behind the unaffected foot position (asymmetric-2). An EMG system was used to measure ES and GM muscle activities. The strategies were performed in a random order, and the mean values of five measurements were used in the analysis. One-way repeated measure ANOVA was used to determine the statistical significance of differences between the conditions. [Results] The affected ES muscle activity was significantly greater in asymmetric-2 (180.7±73.4) than in symmetrical foot placement (149.8±54.2). In addition, the affected ES, unaffected ES, and affected GM muscle activity were significantly greater in asymmetric-2 (180.7±73.4, 173.5±83.1, 98.3±90.3 respectively) than in asymmetric-1 foot placement (147.3±53.8, 151.2±76.5, 84.9±73.8 respectively). [Conclusion] Our results suggest that it may be more desirable for persons with stroke to place the affected foot behind the unaffected foot when performing STS to increase affected ES and GM muscle activation.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of different foot positioning on bilateral erector spinae (ES) and gluteus maximaus (GM) activation during sit-to-stand in stroke patients using surface electromyography(EMG). Fifteen randomly selected stroke patients participated and were required to perform sit-to-stand (STS) with three different strategies as follows: 1) symmetric foot position, 2) unaffected foot placed behind the affected foot position (asymmetric-1), 3) affected foot placed behind the unaffected foot position (asymmetric-2). The EMG system was used to measure erector spinae and gluteus maximus muscle activation. All conditions were conducted randomly and the mean values were obtained from muscle activity being measured 5 times. One-way repeated measure ANOVA was used to determine statistical significance of differences between each conditions. According to the results, the affected erector spine muscle activation was significantly greater with asymmetric-2 compared to symmetrical foot placement (p<0.05). In addition, the affected ES, nonaffected ES, and affected gluteus maxims muscle activation was significantly greater with asymmetric-2 compared to asymmetric-1 (p<0.05). Our results suggest that it may be more effective for patients with stroke to place the affected foot behind the unaffected foot when performing STS to increase erector spinae and affected gluteus muscle activation and to include as part of a valuable clinical intervention.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.