No abstract

Gastroesophageal variceal bleeding in patients with cirrhosis is associated with significant morbidity and mortality, as well as a high rebleeding risk. Limited data are available on the role of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) with covered stents in patients receiving standard endoscopic, vasoactive, and antibiotic treatment. In this multicenter randomized trial, long-term endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) or glue injection 1 b-blocker treatment was compared with TIPS placement in 72 patients with a first or second episode of gastric and/or esophageal variceal bleeding, after hemodynamic stabilization upon endoscopic, vasoactive, and antibiotic treatment. Randomization was stratified according to Child-Pugh score. Kaplan-Meier (event-free) survival estimates were used for the endpoints rebleeding, death, treatment failure, and hepatic encephalopathy. During a median follow-up of 23 months, 10 (29%) of 35 patients in the endoscopy 1 b-blocker group, as compared to 0 of 37 (0%) patients in the TIPS group, developed variceal rebleeding (P 5 0.001). Mortality (TIPS 32% vs. endoscopy 26%; P 5 0.418) and treatment failure (TIPS 38% vs. endoscopy 34%; P 5 0.685) did not differ between groups. Early hepatic encephalopathy (within 1 year) was significantly more frequent in the TIPS group (35% vs. 14%; P 5 0.035), but during longterm follow-up this difference diminished (38% vs. 23%; P 5 0.121). Conclusions: In unselected patients with cirrhosis, who underwent successful endoscopic hemostasis for variceal bleeding, covered TIPS was superior to EVL 1 b-blocker for reduction of variceal rebleeding, but did not improve survival. TIPS was associated with higher rates of early hepatic encephalopathy. (HEPATOLOGY 2016;63:581-589) G astroesophageal variceal bleeding (GEVB) is a severe complication of portal hypertension. Rebleeding is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Hospitalization costs for rebleeding range between $6,600 and $23,000 in the United States.For these reasons, management should be directed at its prevention.1,2 Secondary prevention is first achieved by endoscopic treatment (endoscopic variceal ligation [EVL] for esophageal varices and N-butyl cyanoacrylate injection for gastric varices) in combination with bAbbreviations: CI, confidence interval; EVL, endoscopic variceal ligation; GEVB, gastroesophageal variceal bleeding; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; HR, hazard ratio; IQR, interquartile range; MELD, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease; PTFE, polytetrafluorethylene; TIPS, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt.From the Departments of

Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is a gastroenterological emergency with a mortality of 6%-13%. The vast majority of these bleeds are due to peptic ulcers. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and Helicobacter pylori are the main risk factors for peptic ulcer disease. Endoscopy has become the mainstay for diagnosis and treatment of acute UGIB, and is recommended within 24 h of presentation. Proton pump inhibitor (PPI) administration before endoscopy can downstage the bleeding lesion and reduce the need for endoscopic therapy, but has no effect on rebleeding, mortality and need for surgery. Endoscopic therapy should be undertaken for ulcers with high-risk stigmata, to reduce the risk of rebleeding. This can be done with a variety of modalities. High-dose PPI administration after endoscopy can prevent rebleeding and reduce the need for further intervention and mortality, particularly in patients with high-risk stigmata.

NCT01142180.

Patients on antithrombotic therapy (ATT) have the highest risk of ongoing bleeding and mortality. Hemospray (Cook Medical, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA) is a novel hemostatic agent for the treatment of upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB). Initial reports on its use appear promising in terms of initial hemostasis and rebleeding rates. It is unknown whether this also pertains to patients on ATT. The aim of the current study therefore was to evaluate the efficacy of Hemospray in the treatment of UGIB in patients taking ATTs. A total of 16 unselected consecutive patients with UGIB who were treated with Hemospray were analyzed (eight taking ATT for various indications and eight not on ATT). Initial hemostasis was achieved after Hemospray application in 5 /8 patients on ATT (63 %) and in all eight patients not on therapy (P = 0.20). Rebleeding rates were similar in both groups. These preliminary data on the use of Hemospray in the management of UGIB are promising in both patients with and without ATT; however, caution should be exercised for its use in patients on ATT with spurting arterial bleeding.