Fructans are polysaccharides consisting of one glucose unit and two or more fructose units. It was hypothesized that fructans play a role in drought tolerance in plants by interacting directly with the membrane. In this paper we investigated this hypothesis by studying fructan-membrane interactions in hydrated mono- and bilayer systems. It was found that fructans inserted between the headgroups of different kinds of phospholipids with some preference for phosphatidylethanolamine. Insertion occurred even under conditions of very tight lipid packing. The presence of a surface associated layer of fructan was observed in both model systems. This layer was able to reduce the ability of a surface-active protein to interact with the lipids. Fructans showed a much stronger effect on the different lipid systems than other (poly)saccharides, which appears to be related to their hydrophobic properties. Fructans were able to stabilize the liquid-crystalline lamellar phase, which is consistent with a drought protecting role in plants.

Fructans are a group of fructose-based oligo- and polysaccharides. They are proposed to be involved in membrane protection of plants during dehydration. In accordance with this hypothesis, they show an interaction with hydrated lipid model systems. However, the structural requirements for this interaction are not known both with respect to the fructans as to the lipids. To get insight into this matter, the interaction of several inulins and levan with lipids was investigated using a monomolecular lipid system or the MC 540 probe in a bilayer system. MD was used to get conformational information concerning the polysaccharides. It was found that levan-type fructan interacted comparably with model membranes composed of glyco- or phospholipids but showed a preference for lipids with a small headgroup. Furthermore, it was found that there was an inulin chain-length-dependent interaction with lipids. The results also suggested that inulin-type fructan had a more profound interaction with the membrane than levan-type fructan. MD simulations indicated that the favorable conformation for levan is a helix, whereas inulin tends to form random coil structures. This suggests that flexibility is an important determinant for the fructan-lipid interaction.

Fructans, a family of oligo- and polyfructoses, are implicated to play a drought-protecting role in plants. Inulin-type fructan is able to preserve the membrane barrier during dehydration. However, whether other fructans would be able to perform this function is unknown. In addition, almost nothing is known about the organization of these systems, which could give insight into the protective mechanism. To get insight into these questions the effect of different fructans on phosphatidylcholine-based model systems under conditions of dehydration was analyzed. Using a vesicle leakage assay, it was found that both levan- and inulin-type fructans protected the membrane barrier. This suggests that fructans in general would be able to protect the membrane barrier function. Furthermore, both fructan-types inhibited vesicle fusion to a large extent as measured using a lipid-mixing assay. Using x-ray diffraction, it was found that in the presence of both inulin- and levan-type fructans the lamellar repeat distance increased considerably. From this it was concluded that fructans are present between the lipid bilayers during drying. Furthermore, they stabilize the L(alpha) phase. In contrast to fructans, dextran did not increase the lamellar repeat distance and it even promoted L(beta) phase formation. These data support the hypothesis that fructans can have a membrane-protecting role during dehydration, and give insight into the mechanism of protection.

Fructans are a group of fructose-based oligo- and polysaccharides, which appear to be involved in membrane preservation during dehydration by interacting with the membrane lipids. To get further understanding of the protective mechanism, the consequences of the fructan-membrane lipid interaction for the molecular organization and dynamics in the dry state were studied. POPC and DMPC were investigated in the dry state by (2)H, (31)P NMR, and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy using two types of fructan and dextran. The order-disorder transition temperature of dry POPC was reduced by 70 degrees C in the presence of fructan. Fructan increased the mobility of the acyl chains, but immobilized the lipid headgroup region. Most likely, fructans insert between the headgroups of lipids, thereby spacing the acyl chains. This results in a much lower phase transition temperature. The headgroup is immobilized by the interaction with fructan. The location of the interaction with the lipid headgroup is different for the inulin-type fructan compared to the levan-type fructan, since inulin shows interaction with the lipid phosphate group, whereas levan does not. Dextran did not influence the phase transition temperature of dry POPC showing that reduction of this temperature is not a general property of polysaccharides.

SecA is the central component of the proteintranslocation machinery of Escherichia coli. It is able to interact with the precursor protein, the chaperone SecB, the integral membrane protein complex SecYEG, acidic phospholipids and its own mRNA. We studied the interaction between prePhoE and SecA by using a site-specific photocrosslinking strategy. We found that SecA is able to interact with both the signal sequence and the mature domain of prePhoE. Furthermore, this interaction was dependent on the type of nucleotide bound. SecA in the ADP-bound conformation was unable to crosslink with the precursor, whereas the ATP-bound conformation was active in precursor crosslinking. The SecA^precursor interaction was maintained in the presence of E. coli phospholipids but was loosened by the presence of phosphatidylglycerol bilayers. Examining SecA ATP binding site mutants demonstrated that ATP hydrolysis at the N-terminal high affinity binding site is responsible for the changed interaction with the preprotein.ß 2000 Federation of European Biochemical Societies. Published by Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

No abstract