Genetic correlations between the sexes can constrain the evolution of sexual dimorphism and be difficult to alter, because traits common to both sexes share the same genetic underpinnings. We tested whether artificial correlational selection favoring specific combinations of male and female traits within families could change the strength of a very high between-sex genetic correlation for flower size in the dioecious plant Silene latifolia. This novel selection dramatically reduced the correlation in two of three selection lines in fewer than five generations. Subsequent selection only on females in a line characterized by a lower between-sex genetic correlation led to a significantly lower correlated response in males, confirming the potential evolutionary impact of the reduced correlation. Although between-sex genetic correlations can potentially constrain the evolution of sexual dimorphism, our findings reveal that these constraints come not from a simple conflict between an inflexible genetic architecture and a pattern of selection working in opposition to it, but rather a complex relationship between a changeable correlation and a form of selection that promotes it. In other words, the form of selection on males and females that leads to sexual dimorphism may also promote the genetic phenomenon that limits sexual dimorphism. K E Y W O R D S :Between-sex genetic correlation, dioecious, response to selection, sexual dimorphism.
Natural selection should favor the integration of floral traits that enhance pollen export and import in plant populations that rely upon pollinators. If this is true, then phenotypic correlations between floral traits should weaken in self-fertilizing groups that do not require pollinator visitation to produce seed. We tested this hypothesis in Leavenworthia, a plant genus in which there have been multiple independent losses of the sporophytic self-incompatibility system found throughout the Brassicaceae. In particular, we conducted phylogenetically independent contrasts of floral trait correlations between two pairs of self-incompatible (SI) and self-compatible (SC) sister taxa. In support of the hypothesis that pollinator-mediated selection integrates floral traits, we found that both SC Leavenworthia taxa have weaker overall floral correlations in comparison to sister taxa that rely upon pollinators. The two independently derived SC Leavenworthia flowers have significantly weaker stamen-petal or pistil-petal correlations, respectively, whereas the stamen-pistil correlation remains constant. These patterns suggest that relaxation of pollinator-mediated selection weakens the integration of traits associated with pollen export and import. The retention of high stamen-pistil correlations in the SC taxa of Leavenworthia further implies that the integration of these traits is either constrained or maintained by selection favoring the successful transfer of pollen within flowers to secure self-pollination.
Increased understanding of inter-tumoral heterogeneity at the genomic level has led to significant advancements in the treatment of solid tumors. Functional genomic alterations conferring sensitivity to targeted therapies can take many forms, and appropriate methods and tools are needed to detect these alterations. This review provides an update on genetic variability among solid tumors of similar histologic classification, using non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and melanoma as examples. We also discuss relevant technological platforms for discovery and diagnosis of clinically actionable variants and highlight the implications of specific genomic alterations for response to targeted therapy.
BackgroundPrecision medicine has resulted in increasing complexity in the treatment of cancer. Web-based educational materials can help address the needs of oncology health care professionals seeking to understand up-to-date treatment strategies.ObjectiveThis study aimed to assess learning styles of oncology health care professionals and to determine whether learning style-tailored educational materials lead to enhanced learning.MethodsIn all, 21,465 oncology health care professionals were invited by email to participate in the fully automated, parallel group study. Enrollment and follow-up occurred between July 13 and September 7, 2015. Self-enrolled participants took a learning style survey and were assigned to the intervention or control arm using concealed alternating allocation. Participants in the intervention group viewed educational materials consistent with their preferences for learning (reading, listening, and/or watching); participants in the control group viewed educational materials typical of the My Cancer Genome website. Educational materials covered the topic of treatment of metastatic estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer using cyclin-dependent kinases 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors. Participant knowledge was assessed immediately before (pretest), immediately after (posttest), and 2 weeks after (follow-up test) review of the educational materials. Study statisticians were blinded to group assignment.ResultsA total of 751 participants enrolled in the study. Of these, 367 (48.9%) were allocated to the intervention arm and 384 (51.1%) were allocated to the control arm. Of those allocated to the intervention arm, 256 (69.8%) completed all assessments. Of those allocated to the control arm, 296 (77.1%) completed all assessments. An additional 12 participants were deemed ineligible and one withdrew. Of the 552 participants, 438 (79.3%) self-identified as multimodal learners. The intervention arm showed greater improvement in posttest score compared to the control group (0.4 points or 4.0% more improvement on average; P=.004) and a higher follow-up test score than the control group (0.3 points or 3.3% more improvement on average; P=.02).ConclusionsAlthough the study demonstrated more learning with learning style-tailored educational materials, the magnitude of increased learning and the largely multimodal learning styles preferred by the study participants lead us to conclude that future content-creation efforts should focus on multimodal educational materials rather than learning style-tailored content.
As the role of genomics in healthcare grows, patients increasingly require adequate genetic literacy to fully engage in their care. This study investigated a model for delivering consumer-friendly genetic information to improve understanding of precision medicine using health literacy and learning style principles. My Cancer Genome (MCG), a freely available cancer decision support tool, was used as a test-bed. MCG content on a melanoma tumor mutation, BRAF V600E, was translated to a sixth grade reading level, incorporating multiple learning modalities. Ninety patients and caregivers were recruited from a melanoma clinic at an academic medical center and randomized to three groups. Group A (control) received an exact copy of text from MCG. Group B was given the same content with hyperlinks to videos explaining key genetic concepts, identified and labeled by the team as “knowledge pearls.” Group C received the translated content with the knowledge pearls embedded. Changes in knowledge were measured through pre- and post- questionnaires. Group C showed the greatest improvement in knowledge. The study results demonstrate that providing information based on health literacy and learning style principles can improve patient understanding of genetic concepts, thus increasing their likelihood of taking an active role in any decision-making concerning their health.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.