Pluripotent cells have been suggested as a prime source to reprogram somatic cells. We used F9 EC cells as a pluripotent partner to reprogram neurosphere cells (NSCs) because they exhibit a nonneural differentiation potential in the presence of retinoic acid. F9-NSC hybrid cells displayed various features of reprogramming, such as reactivation of pluripotency genes, inactivation of tissue-specific genes, and reactivation of the inactive X chromosome. As the hybrid cells undergo differentiation, the pluripotency markers Oct4 and Nanog were downregulated. Whereas neural marker genes were not upregulated, endodermal and mesodermal markers were, suggesting that NSCs lose memory of their neural origin and preferentially differentiate to the lineages corresponding to the F9 program. After fusion, the methylation status in the Xist region was similar to that of F9 EC cells. However, upon differentiation, the Xist region failed to resume the methylation patterns of differentiated cells, suggesting that the Xist in F9-NSC hybrids does not easily acquire a differentiated state.

Reactivation of Oct4 gene expression occurs within 2 days of fusion of somatic cells with pluripotent stem cells and within 9 days of postinfection of four transcription factors. We sought to determine whether somatic genome reprogramming is completed by the onset of Oct4 reactivation. The complex regulation of the reactivation of inactive X chromosome (Xi) serves as a model for studying reprogramming of chromatin domains. A time-course analysis of the DNA methylation, gene expression, and X inactivation-specific transcript (Xist)/Tsix RNA fluorescence in situ hybridization revealed that expression of pluripotency-and tissue-specific marker genes was reset to the level of pluripotent stem cells within 2 days of fusion, whereas reprogramming of Xist/ reactivation of Xi took at least 9 days. We found that trichostatin A, which normally activates gene expression, results in downregulation of Xist. This is due to activation of Dnmt3a and Tsix, two negative regulators of Xist. Moreover, delayed reprogramming of Xist/reactivation of inactive X chromosome after cell fusion was accelerated by DNA methylation and histone deacetylation of Xist, which follow upregulation of Dnmt3a and Tsix.

No abstract

Somatic cells can achieve a pluripotent cell state in a process called pluripotential reprogramming. Multipotent stem cells can differentiate into cells of only one lineage, but pluripotent stem cells can give rise to cells of all three germ layers of an organism. In this study, we generated induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells from bimaternal (uniparental) parthenogenetic neural stem cells (pNSCs) by transduction with either four (4F: Oct4, Klf4, Sox2, and c-Myc) or two (2F: Oct4 and Klf4) transcription factors. The resultant maternal iPS cells, which were reprogrammed directly from pNSCs, were capable of generating germ line-competent chimeras. Interestingly, analysis of global gene expression and imprinting status revealed that parthenogenetic iPS cells clustered closer to parthenogenetic ESCs than to female ESCs, with patterns that were clearly distinct from those of pNSCs.

The fusion of somatic cells with pluripotent cells results in the generation of pluripotent hybrid cells. Because the `memory' of somatic cells seems to be erased during fusion-induced reprogramming, genetic reprogramming is thought to be a largely unidirectional process. Here we show that fusion-induced reprogramming, which brings about the formation of pluripotent hybrids, does not always follow a unidirectional route. Xist is a unique gene in that it is reprogrammed to the state of somatic cells in fusion-induced pluripotent hybrids. In hybrids formed from the cell fusion of embryonal carcinoma cells (ECCs) with male neural stem cells (mNSCs), the Xist gene was found to be reprogrammed to the somatic cell state, whereas the pluripotency-related and tissue-specific marker genes were reprogrammed to the pluripotent cell state. Specifically, Xist is not expressed in hybrids, because the `memory' of the somatic cell has been retained (i.e. mNSCs do not exhibit Xist expression) and that of the pluripotent cell erased (i.e. inactivation of the partially active Xist gene of ECCs, complete methylation of the Xist region). The latter phenomenon is induced by male, but not by female, NSCs.