No abstract

No abstract

Objectives/Hypothesis: Two types of electrode arrays for cochlear implants (CIs) are distinguished: lateral wall and perimodiolar. Scalar translocation of the array can lead to intracochlear trauma by penetrating from the scala tympani into the scala vestibuli or scala media, potentially negatively affecting hearing performance of CI users. This systematic review compares the lateral wall and perimodiolar arrays with respect to scalar translocation.Study Design: Systematic review. Methods: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were reviewed for studies published within the last 11 years. No other limitations were set. All studies with original data that evaluated the occurrence of scalar translocation or tip fold-over (TF) with postoperative computed tomography (CT) following primary cochlear implantation in bilateral sensorineuronal hearing loss patients were considered to be eligible. Data were extracted independently by two reviewers.Results: We included 33 studies, of which none were randomized controlled trials. Meta-analysis of five cohort studies comparing scalar translocation between lateral wall and perimodiolar arrays showed that lateral wall arrays have significantly lower translocation rates (7% vs. 43%; pooled odds ratio = 0.12). Translocation was negatively associated with speech perception scores (weighted mean 41% vs. 55%). Tip fold-over of the array was more frequent with perimodiolar arrays (X 2 = 6.8, P < .01).Conclusions: Scalar translocation and tip fold-overs occurred more frequently with perimodiolar arrays than with lateral wall arrays. In addition, translocation of the array negatively affects hearing with the cochlear implant. Therefore, if one aims to minimize clinically relevant intracochlear trauma, lateral wall arrays would be the preferred option for cochlear implantation.

No abstract

ObjectivesSkeletal muscle mass (SMM) is most often assessed in cancer patients on abdominal computed tomography (CT) imaging at the level of the third lumbar vertebra (L3). Abdominal CT imaging is not routinely performed in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients. Recently, a novel method to assess SMM on a single transversal CT slice at the level of the third cervical vertebra (C3) was published. The objective of this study was to assess the robustness of this novel C3 measurement method in terms of interobserver agreement.Patients and methodsPatients diagnosed with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA-HNSCC) at our center between 2007 and 2011 were evaluated. Fifty-four patients with were randomly selected for analysis. Six observers independently measured the cross-sectional muscle area (CSMA) at the level of C3 using a predefined, written protocol as instruction. Interobserver agreement was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), a Bland–Altman plot and Fleiss’ kappa (κ).ResultsThe agreement in vertebra selection between all observers was excellent (Fleiss’ κ: 0.96). There was a substantial agreement between all observers in single slice selection (Fleiss’ κ: 0.61). For all CSMA measurements, ICCs were excellent (0.763–0.969; all p < 0.001). The Bland–Altman plot showed good agreement between measurements, with narrow limits of agreement.ConclusionInterobserver agreement for SMM measurement at the level of C3 was excellent. Assessment of SMM at the level of C3 is easy and robust and can performed on routinely available imaging in HNC patients.

There is consistent evidence that survival rates are lower and recurrence rates are higher for patients who continue to smoke after being diagnosed with head and neck cancer. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 38: E2214-E2220, 2016.

Objective To report the oncological outcome and long-term complications of radical surgery by robot-assisted laparoscopy in early stage cervical cancer.Design Observational cohort study.Setting Tertiary referral centre.Population About 100 cervical cancer patients treated consecutively with robot-assisted radical surgery between 2008 and 2013.Methods Two gynaecological oncologists specialised in minimally invasive surgery performed all surgeries on a three/four-armed robotic system. Procedures consisted of pelvic lymph node dissection combined with a radical hysterectomy, radical vaginal trachelectomy or parametrectomy.Main outcome measures Recurrence, survival and long-term complication rates.Results 104 robot-assisted laparoscopies were performed in 100 patients (stage IA1-IIB), with a median follow-up of 29.5 months (range 2.5-67.1 months). Thirteen cases were diagnosed with a loco-regional (8%), distant (4%) or combined (1%) recurrence at a median of 14.4 months (range 2.9-34.8 months). All mortality (7%) was cervical cancer-related and due to recurrent disease. Four recurrences receive palliative care and two are in complete remission. The overall 5-year progression-free and disease-specific survival rates are 81.4 and 88.7%, respectively. Frequent complications were lymphoedema (26%), lower urinary tract symptoms (19%), urinary tract infection (17%) and sexual disorders (9%). Five patients had a vaginal cuff dehiscence. No complication-related mortality occurred. ConclusionThe recurrence, survival and long-term complication rates of robot-assisted radical surgery for early stage cervical cancer in this cohort are reassuring concerning its continued clinical use.

NA.