Background Renal replacement therapy (RRT) is consensual in the presence of life-threatening complications associated with acute kidney injury (AKI). In the absence of urgent indications, the optimal timing for RRT initiation is still under debate. This meta-analysis aims to compare the benefits between early and late RRT initiation strategies in critically ill patients with AKI.H Methods Studies were obtained from three databases (MEDLINE, CENTRAL and SCOPUS), searched from inception to May 2021. The selected primary outcome was 28-day mortality. Secondary outcomes included overall mortality, recovery of renal function (RRF) and RRT associated-adverse events. A random-effects model was used for summary measures. Heterogeneity was assessed through Cochrane I2 test statistics. Potential sources of heterogeneity for the primary outcome were sought using sensitivity analyses. Further subgroup analyses were conducted based on RRT modality and study population. Results Thirteen randomized controlled trials including 5193 participants were analyzed. No significant differences were found between early and late RRT initiation regarding 28-day mortality [Risk Ratio (RR) 1.00; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.89 to 1.12, I² = 30%], overall mortality (RR 1.00; 95%CI 0.90 to 1.12, I² = 42%) and RRF (RR 1.02, 95%CI 0.92 to 1.13, I² = 53%). However, early RRT initiation was associated with a significantly higher incidence of hypotensive (RR 1.34; 95%CI 1.17 to 1.53, I² = 6%) and infectious events (RR 1.83; 95%CI 1.11 to 3.02, I² = 0%). Conclusions Early RRT initiation does not improve the 28-day and overall mortality, neither the likelihood of RRF and increases the risk for RRT-associated adverse events, namely hypotension and infection.
Postprocedural bleeding is the main complication of percutaneous kidney biopsy (PKB). Therefore, aspirin is routinely withheld in patients undergoing PKB to reduce the bleeding risk. The authors aimed to examine the association between aspirin use and bleeding during PKB. This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The article search was performed on MEDLINE and Scopus using queries specific to each database. Article inclusion was limited to primary studies. The meta-analysis compared the risk of major bleeding events between the aspirinexposed versus nonexposed group. Pooled effect estimate was examined using random effects presented as odds ratio with 95% confidence intervals. Heterogeneity was assessed through Cochrane I 2 test statistics. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were also performed according to kidney type. Ten studies were included in the review and four studies were included in the meta-analysis, reviewing a total of 34,067 PKBs. Definitions for significant aspirin exposure were inconsistent between studies, limiting comparisons. Studies with broader definitions for aspirin exposure mostly showed no correlation between aspirin use and postbiopsy bleeding. Studies with strict definitions for aspirin exposure found an increased risk of hemorrhagic events in the aspirin-exposed group. No significant differences were found between the aspirin-exposed and comparison groups regarding major bleeding events (odds ratio 1.72; 95% confidence interval 0.50 to 5.89, I 2 584%). High-quality evidence on the effect of aspirin on the bleeding risk is limited. Our meta-analysis did not show a significantly increased risk of major bleeding complications in aspirin-exposed patients. Further studies are needed to define a more comprehensive approach for clinical practice.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Renal replacement therapy (RRT) is consensual in the presence of life-threatening complications associated with acute kidney injury (AKI). In the absence of urgent indications, the optimal timing for RRT initiation is still under debate. This systematic review with meta-analysis aims to compare the benefits between early and late RRT initiation strategies in critically ill patients with AKI. METHOD Studies were obtained from three databases (MEDLINE, CENTRAL and SCOPUS), searched from inception to May 2021. The selected primary outcome was 28-day mortality. Secondary outcomes included overall mortality, recovery of renal function (RRF) and RRT-associated adverse events. A random-effects model was used for summary measures. Heterogeneity was assessed through Cochrane I2 test statistics. Potential sources of heterogeneity for the primary outcome were sought using sensitivity analyses. Further subgroup analyses were conducted based on the RRT modality. RESULTS A total of 13 randomized controlled trials, including 5193 participants, were analyzed. No significant differences were found between early and late RRT initiation regarding 28-day mortality [risk ratio (RR) 1.00, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.89–1.12; I² = 30%], overall mortality (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.90–1.12; I² = 42%) and RRF (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.92–1.13; I² = 53%). However, early RRT initiation was associated with a significantly higher incidence of hypotensive (RR 1.34, 95% CI 1.17–1.53; I² = 6%) and infectious events (RR 1.83, 95% CI 1.11–3.02; I² = 0%). CONCLUSION Early RRT initiation does not improve the 28-day or overall mortality, nor the likelihood of RRF and increases the risk for RRT-associated adverse events, namely hypotension and infection.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.