AbstrakKeberhasilan dalam pengembalian aset hasil tindak pidana korupsi menjadi salah satu indikator keberhasilan dalam upaya pemberantasan korupsi di Indonesia. Tren korupsi yang lintas negara dan melibatkan banyak aktor, menyebabkan upaya pengembalian aset (asset recovery) menjadi tidak mudah. Paper ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji tiga hal penting, yakni: (1) upaya pengembalian aset hasil korupsi yang berada di luar negeri, (2) peran lembaga negara dan aparat penegak hukum, dan (3) faktor hambatannya. Penelitian paper ini menggunakan pendekatan yuridis sosiologis, penelitian kualitatif dengan spesifikasi penelitiannya deskriptif analitis, teknik pengumpulan data dengan cara wawancara dan dokumentasi. Paper ini menggarisbawahi bahwa p pengembalian aset dapat dilakukan melalui jalur formal dengan MLA dan informal melalui hubungan diplomatik. Tahap pengembalian aset terdiri atas: (1) identifikasi dan penelusuran, (2) proses hukum, dan (3) perampasan aset. Hambatan dalam pengembalian aset meliputi sistem hukum yang berbeda, lemahnya putusan hakim, kemauan politik pemerintah, dan berlakunya asas kerahasiaan bank di beberapa negara. Permasalahan yang muncul dalam pengembalian aset bisa diatasi dengan perjanjian bilateral, meningkatkan kompetensi aparat penegak hukum, dan memantapkan aturan dan sarana prasarana pendukung. Peran pemerintah baik Kejaksaan Agung, NCB Interpol Indonesia, KPK, Kemenkumham, dan Kemenlu, semuanya saling mendukung satu sama lain dalam upaya pengembalian aset sesuai dengan aturan hukum yang berlaku. Paper ini menyimpulkan bahwa dalam pengembalian aset membutuhkan kerjasama antar lembaga dan aparat penegak hukum baik yang berada di dalam maupun di luar negeri. AbstractOne of aimed indicators on corruption eradication in Indonesia is the successful of assets recovery. Trend of corruption that cross border nations and involved many actors caused the assets recovery process was not easy to be done. This paper would examine three main points: (1) the effort of corrupted asset which save abroad; (2) roles of state institutions and law enforcement officers on assets recovery; and (3) the obstacles on assets recovery. The paper used a socio-legal approach, qualitative research with descriptive analytical research specifications, and techniques of data collection through interviews and documentation methods. This paper was underlined that assets recovery can be optimized by two ways, one of formal track through MLA and other is informal track with diplomatic relations. The process of assets recovery started from (1) identify and trace, (2) legal proceedings, and until (3) repatriate. The obstacles on asset recovery was concerning to a different legal system, a weakness of judicial verdict, good and political will of government, and the implementation of bank secrecy principle in some countries. Some problems faced in assets recovery process resolved by conducting bilateral agreements, improving the competence of law enforcement officers, and establishing the rules and supporting infrastructure. The roles ...
Law enforcement in Indonesia has its own complexities, as law reform which has its challenges. The first edition of the Journal of Law and Legal Reform presents ten articles relating to law enforcement and law reform in various sectors. In general, this edition tries to look at various facts that occur in the community, where in a number of legal cases considered unable to respond to rapid developments in the community.
The importance of anti-corruption education for communities in the area of Jabunganan Village in particular among teenagers, because they were the agents of change for nation building Indonesia in order to form a generation that has integrity. Attempts are made to college student real work relating to the State University of Semarang 2019 in instilling the value of anti-corruption through the PENETRASI method (Penanaman Sembilan Nilai Karakter Anti Korupsi) by holding
Empirical facts show that there are 42 thousand laws and regulations in Indonesia. As a result, there are many overlapping regulations, both in the same hierarchical level and / or with the regulations below. This condition makes the Omnibus Law urgency in statutory regulations. Omnibus Law is one of the important alternative choices by harmonizing legislation. The Omnibus Law is an umbrella law because it regulates thoroughly and then has power over other rules. Stufenbau theory, the legal system and the operation of law are the basis for analysis that the harmonization of the Omnibus law becomes a protector for executives (implementing legislation) who will innovate and create divine justice in economic progress and investment. The implementation of the concept of omnibus law in Indonesia is a hierarchical order of linear legislation with Law Number 15 of 2019 concerning the Formation of Legislations. The form of a law is not a basic law, but a law which is equivalent to other laws, which all or part of the provisions are amended or abolished by making new norms.
This research is driven from the ineffectiveness of village empowerment in the North Coast of Central Java (Pemalang, Tegal Regency, Tegal City, Pekalongan, and Batang), especially in environmental issues. In fact, the environment is an important part of village development and has the most important contribution to a prosperous independent community according to Law No. 6 of 2014 concerning Villages (Village Law). Environmental development (biotic and abiotic) has a very significant role, and humans as one of the biotic components place a strategic position in the development of the environment in the village. This study aims to produce a synergistic model that combines legal instruments, implementation, and environmental education in rural development. Chamblis and Seidman’s theories (about Law and Society) are used in this study and this study emphasizes that: (1) laws and regulations should be used to achieve social welfare and justice, including in environmental terms, but in fact this is not maximally done, (2) village development as a mandate of the Village Law on the North Coast has not been oriented towards environmental development, so that the use of village funds is ineffective, and (3) the synergy model of village development emphasizes progressive legal principles as one of the tools to encourage law enforcement which is more effective.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.