Background and Aim The complete and safe removal of large (≥ 20 mm) colorectal lesions is an area of concern. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) effectively removes these lesions compared with endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR). However, ESD requires advanced techniques, longer procedure time, and high cost. Precutting EMR (EMR‐P) is a modified EMR method that overcomes the limitations of EMR. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of EMR‐P and ESD in large (20–30 mm) flat colorectal lesions. Methods This was a retrospective analysis of cases in which 20‐ to 30‐mm flat colorectal lesions were resected at Seoul St. Mary's Hospital from January 2014 to December 2019. Propensity score matching was performed to control for possible confounders. Results Two hundred and ninety‐nine patients were included in this study. After matching, 90 patients were assigned to each group. There were no significant difference in complete resection rates (92.2% vs 92.2%, P = 1.000), en bloc resection rates (95.6% vs 97.8%, P = 0.682), and mean size of lesions (22.9 ± 3.1 mm vs 23.0 ± 3.1 mm, P = 0.867) between EMR‐P and ESD. Procedure time was significantly shorter with EMR‐P (11.0 ± 6.5 min vs 37.0 ± 19.3 min, P < 0.001). The adverse events rate was not significantly different between both groups. No local recurrence occurred in both groups. Conclusions Precutting EMR was not significantly different to ESD in terms of complete resection rate and en bloc resection rate for 20‐ to 30‐mm flat colorectal lesions without fibrosis. Furthermore, EMR‐P has shorter procedure time than ESD. EMR‐P could be considered one of standard treatments for large flat colorectal lesions.

No abstract

Collagenous gastroduodenitis is a rare gastrointestinal disease diagnosed histologically by subepithelial collagen deposition in the lamina propria. Its clinical presentation is diverse. The authors encountered a 17-year-old female patient who complained of epigastric pain. Endoscopy revealed several deep ulcers in the gastric body. The gastric mucosa around the ulcer showed diffuse fine nodularity in the shape of cobblestones with open-type atrophy. The duodenal mucosa showed nodular lesions similar to those of the gastric mucosa. The gastric ulcer healed completely with proton pump inhibitor treatment. The patient was followed up, showing no remarkable mucosal change of stomach or duodenum for several years. Collagenous gastroduodenitis was diagnosed by repeated histologic examinations. This paper reports a rare case of chronic collagen gastritis with deep gastric ulcer and its long-term clinical progress.

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is considered in patients with insufficient oral intake who need enteral feeding or therapeutic gastric decompression. PEG tube feeding is generally superior to nasogastric tube feeding in terms of patients’ comfort, long-term use, and feeding efficiency. Patient selection for PEG, the proper endoscopic insertion technique, early recognition of complications, and appropriate management are important for patient care. During preparation, adequate management of anticoagulation and antithrombotic agents are important to prevent bleeding, and prophylactic antibiotics prevent wound infection. Most complications are minor; however, major complications that require surgical correction or are life-threatening may occur, such as wound infection, bleeding, buried bumper syndrome, colocutaneous fistula, perforation, volvulus, and injuries to other organs. This review presents practical guidelines for the selection and preparation of patients, endoscopic insertion methods, and complication management strategies.