The naturalization process itself is known in Law no. 12 of 2006 concerning Citizenship of the Republic of Indonesia, naturalization is divided into two, namely ordinary naturalization and special naturalization, ordinary naturalization is sufficient to meet the administrative requirements stipulated by law, while special naturalization must obtain the consideration of the House of Representatives before obtaining citizenship. The thing that needs to be observed in this special naturalization process is that someone who wants to be naturalized must first have service to the Indonesian nation, the anomaly that is happening at this time is that the government allows naturalization policies without considering the interests of the state, but for the interests of clubs playing in Indonesian leagues. . Therefore, this study takes the formulation of the problem, how is the legal politics of the special naturalization policy for football players in Indonesia in terms of Law no. 12 of 2006 concerning Citizenship? In this study, the research method is normative juridical. The conclusion in this study is that the current naturalization policy is contrary to the constitutional mandate, especially in Article 20 of Law No. 12 of 2006 concerning citizenship, by facilitating the naturalization process, making naturalization players filled with players whoThe naturalization process itself is known in Law no. 12 of 2006 concerning Citizenship of the Republic of Indonesia, naturalization is divided into two, namely ordinary naturalization and special naturalization, ordinary naturalization is sufficient to meet the administrative requirements stipulated by law, while special naturalization must obtain the consideration of the House of Representatives before obtaining citizenship. The thing that needs to be observed in this special naturalization process is that someone who wants to be naturalized must first have service to the Indonesian nation, the anomaly that is happening at this time is that the government allows naturalization policies without considering the interests of the state, but for the interests of clubs playing in Indonesian leagues. . Therefore, this study takes the formulation of the problem, how is the legal politics of the special naturalization policy for football players in Indonesia in terms of Law no. 12 of 2006 concerning Citizenship? In this study, the research method is normative juridical. The conclusion in this study is that the current naturalization policy is contrary to the constitutional mandate, especially in Article 20 of Law No. 12 of 2006 concerning citizenship, by facilitating the naturalization process, making naturalization players filled with players who are of old age and cannot contribute to the Indonesian national team for a long time.
ABSTRAK Bantuan hukum yang berjudul penerapan pasal 56 KUHAP tentang bantuan hukum ditiap tingkat pemeriksaan tersangka (studi kasus pada penyidikan Polres Metro Tangerang Kota). Dengan rumusan masalah bagaimana penerapan pasal 56 KUHAP tentang bantuan hukum pada tingkat pemeriksaan di Polres Metro Tangerang Kota serta menganalisis upaya Polres Metro Tangerang Kota dalam sosialisasi pasal 56 KUHAP kepada masyarakat kurang mampu. pendekatan metode penelitian dilakukan secara normatif empiris dengan subjek penelitian direskrimum Polres Metro Tangerang Kota dan ketua Pusat Bantuan Hukum Peradi Tangerang, bantuan hukum merupakan suatu hak yang harus diperoleh tersangka sebagai suatu implementasi Negara hukum untuk menjamin hak asasi warga negaranya dalam mencapai suatu keadilan dan bantuan hukum merupakan hal fundamental yang harus di dapatkan oleh tersangka melihat banyak nya realitas ketimpangan hukum bagi seorang tersangka utnuk mendapatkan haknya. Bantuan hukum di upayakan secara optimal dibuktikan dengan adanya penurunan jumlah jenis tindak pidana pada periode tahun 2016 sampai 2018 yang terdiri dari 10 jenis tindak pidana, upaya Polres Metro Tangerang Kota dalam penerapan dan sosialisasi nya dengan memberikan informasi kepada tersangka, keluarga tersangka dengan cara mengedukasi pentingnya bantuan hukum pada tingkat pemeriksaan tersangka serta upaya pemberian papan informasi tentang hak tersangka yang wajib untuk mendapatkan bantuan hukum di tingkat kepolisian sehingga dalam pelaksanaannya bisa berjalan dengan baik untuk mencapai suatu keadilan. Kata kunci: Bantuan Hukum, penerapan, Jenis tindak pidana. ABSTRACT Legal aid entitled the application of article 56 of the Criminal Procedure Code on legal assistance at each level of examination of suspects (case study in the investigation of Tangerang City Police Resort). With the formulation of the problem of how the application of article 56 of the Criminal Procedure Code on legal assistance at the level of inspection in the Tangerang City Metro Police as well as analyzing the efforts of the Jakarta Metro City Police in the socialization of article 56 Criminal Procedure Code to underprivileged people. approach to the research method is carried out empirically normatively with research subjects reskrimum Tangerang City Police Precinct and chairman of the Peradi Tangerang Legal Aid Center, legal aid is a right that must be obtained by the suspect as an implementation of the rule of law to guarantee the rights of its citizens in achieving justice and legal assistance is a fundamental thing that must be obtained by the suspect seeing the many reality of legal inequality for a suspect to get his rights. Legal assistance is optimally sought as evidenced by a decrease in the number of types of criminal acts in the period 2016 to 2018 consisting of 10 types of criminal acts, the efforts of the Metro Tangerang City Police in its application and outreach by providing information to suspects, suspects' families by educating the importance legal assistance at the suspect's investigation level and efforts to provide information boards about the rights of suspects who are required to obtain legal assistance at the police level so that in its implementation it can go well to achieve justice.Keywords: Legal Aid, application, type of crime
Regulations related to joint assets of husband and wife of Muslims are subject to the provisions of the Marriage Law and the Compilation of Islamic Law. The position of the compilation of Islamic law that is under the Marriage Law and the emergence of legal consequences on joint assets of husband and wife in terms of credit transactions with financial institutions are the basis for the urgency of making a marriage agreement. Where the marriage agreement must explicitly regulate the mixing or separation of joint assets between husband and wife. The goal is to achieve legal certainty regarding the rights and obligations of husband and wife regarding joint assets in the event of a credit transaction with a financing institution.Keywords: Marriage Agreement, Joint Assets, Compilation of Islamic Law, Marriage Law
The naturalization process itself is known in Law no. 12 of 2006 concerning Citizenship of the Republic of Indonesia, naturalization is divided into two, namely ordinary naturalization and special naturalization, ordinary naturalization is sufficient to meet the administrative requirements stipulated by law, while special naturalization must obtain the consideration of the House of Representatives before obtaining citizenship. The thing that needs to be observed in this special naturalization process is that someone who wants to be naturalized must first have service to the Indonesian nation, the anomaly that is happening at this time is that the government allows naturalization policies without considering the interests of the state, but for the interests of clubs playing in Indonesian leagues. . Therefore, this study takes the formulation of the problem, how is the legal politics of the special naturalization policy for football players in Indonesia in terms of Law no. 12 of 2006 concerning Citizenship? In this study, the research method is normative juridical. The conclusion in this study is that the current naturalization policy is contrary to the constitutional mandate, especially in Article 20 of Law No. 12 of 2006 concerning citizenship, by facilitating the naturalization process, making naturalization players filled with players whoThe naturalization process itself is known in Law no. 12 of 2006 concerning Citizenship of the Republic of Indonesia, naturalization is divided into two, namely ordinary naturalization and special naturalization, ordinary naturalization is sufficient to meet the administrative requirements stipulated by law, while special naturalization must obtain the consideration of the House of Representatives before obtaining citizenship. The thing that needs to be observed in this special naturalization process is that someone who wants to be naturalized must first have service to the Indonesian nation, the anomaly that is happening at this time is that the government allows naturalization policies without considering the interests of the state, but for the interests of clubs playing in Indonesian leagues. . Therefore, this study takes the formulation of the problem, how is the legal politics of the special naturalization policy for football players in Indonesia in terms of Law no. 12 of 2006 concerning Citizenship? In this study, the research method is normative juridical. The conclusion in this study is that the current naturalization policy is contrary to the constitutional mandate, especially in Article 20 of Law No. 12 of 2006 concerning citizenship, by facilitating the naturalization process, making naturalization players filled with players who are of old age and cannot contribute to the Indonesian national team for a long time.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.