Inactivation of the retinoblastoma (RB1) tumor suppressor is one of the most frequent and early recognized molecular hallmarks of cancer. RB1, although mainly studied for its role in the regulation of cell cycle, emerged as a key regulator of many biological processes. Among these, RB1 has been implicated in the regulation of apoptosis, the alteration of which underlies both cancer development and resistance to therapy. RB1 role in apoptosis, however, is still controversial because, depending on the context, the apoptotic cues, and its own status, RB1 can act either by inhibiting or promoting apoptosis. Moreover, the mechanisms whereby RB1 controls both proliferation and apoptosis in a coordinated manner are only now beginning to be unraveled. Here, by reviewing the main studies assessing the effect of RB1 status and modulation on these processes, we provide an overview of the possible underlying molecular mechanisms whereby RB1, and its family members, dictate cell fate in various contexts. We also describe the current antitumoral strategies aimed at the use of RB1 as predictive, prognostic and therapeutic target in cancer. A thorough understanding of RB1 function in controlling cell fate determination is crucial for a successful translation of RB1 status assessment in the clinical setting.

SummaryTheurinary-type plasminogen activator,oruPA,controls matrix degradation through the conversion of plasminogen into plasmin andisregardedasthe criticaltriggerfor plasmin generation duringcellmigrationand invasion,under physiologicaland pathologicalconditions(such as cancermetastasis).Theproteolytic activity of uPAisresponsible forthe activationorrelease of several growth factors and modulatest he cell survival/apoptosis Keywords Urokinase,urokinaser eceptor,cellp roliferation,tumour progression,apoptosis ratiot hrought he dynamicc ontrolo fc ell-matrix contacts.The urokinaser eceptor (uPAR), binding to the EGF-liked omain of uPA, directs membrane-associated extracellular proteolysis and signals through transmembrane proteins, thusregulating cell migration,adhesion and cytoskeletal status. However, recent evidence highlights an intricate relationship linking the uPA/uPAR system to cell growth and apoptosis.

The serine protease urokinase (uPA) binds to the urokinase receptor (uPAR) through its growth-factor domain (GFD, residues 1-49), affecting cell migration, adhesion and growth. Here, we show that uPA can promote cytoskeletal rearrangements and directional cell migration in a GFD-independent manner, through a new and specific interaction between an internal uPA domain coined `connecting peptide' (residues 132-158) and cell-surface integrin αvβ5. Remarkably, a peptide corresponding to this region (CPp, residues 135-158) retains the ability to bind to αvβ5, eliciting cytoskeletal rearrangements and directing cell migration at a concentration as low as 1-10 pM. These effects are lost in cells not expressing uPAR, indicating that the uPAR is required for CPp-dependent signaling. Furthermore, the CPp-αvβ5-integrin interaction enhances F-actin-enriched protrusions and cell migration induced by the well-established interaction between the uPAR-binding peptide (GFDp, residues 12-32) of uPA and uPAR. These results provide new insight into the function of uPA, which - through individual domains - can engage two different surface receptors (uPAR and αvβ5 integrin), thus initiating and potentiating intracellular signaling and migration.

Our data show that the monococcum lines Monlis and ID331 activate the CD T cell response and suggest that these lines are toxic for celiac patients. However, ID331 is likely to be less effective in inducing CD because of its inability to activate the innate immune pathways.