Oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) was formed~7500 years ago by hybridization between B. rapa and B. oleracea, followed by chromosome doubling, a process known as allopolyploidy. Together with more ancient polyploidizations, this conferred an aggregate 72× genome multiplication since the origin of angiosperms and high gene content. We examined the B. napus genome and the consequences of its recent duplication. The constituent A n and C n subgenomes are engaged in subtle structural, functional, and epigenetic cross-talk, with abundant homeologous exchanges. Incipient gene loss and expression divergence have begun. Selection in B. napus oilseed types has accelerated the loss of glucosinolate genes, while preserving expansion of oil biosynthesis genes. These processes provide insights into allopolyploid evolution and its relationship with crop domestication and improvement.T he Brassicaceae are a large eudicot family (1) and include the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Brassicas have a propensity for genome duplications ( Fig. 1) and genome mergers (2). They are major contributors to the human diet and were among the earliest cultigens (3).B. napus (genome A n A n C n C n ) was formed by recent allopolyploidy between ancestors of B. oleracea (Mediterranean cabbage, genome C o C o ) and B. rapa (Asian cabbage or turnip, genome A r A r ) and is polyphyletic (2, 4), with spontaneous formation regarded by Darwin as an example of unconscious selection (5). Cultivation began in Europe during the Middle Ages and spread worldwide. Diversifying selection gave rise to oilseed rape (canola), rutabaga, fodder rape, and kale morphotypes grown for oil, fodder, and food (4, 6).The homozygous B. napus genome of European winter oilseed cultivar 'Darmor-bzh' was assembled with long-read [>700 base pairs (bp)] 454 GS-FLX+ Titanium (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) and Sanger sequence (tables S1 to S5 and figs. S1 to S3) (7). Correction and gap filling used 79 Gb of Illumina (San Diego, CA) HiSeq sequence. A final assembly of 849.7 Mb was obtained with SOAP (8) and Newbler (Roche), with 89% nongapped sequence (tables S2 and S3). Unique mapping of 5× nonassembled 454 sequences from B. rapa ('Chiifu') or B. oleracea (' TO1000') assigned most of the 20,702 B. napus scaffolds to either the A n (8294) or the C n (9984) subgenomes (tables S4 and S5 and fig. S3). The assembly covers~79% of the 1130-Mb genome and includes 95.6% of Brassica expressed sequence tags (ESTs) (7). A single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) map (tables S6 to S9 and figs. S4 to S8) genetically anchored 712.3 Mb (84%) of the genome assembly, yielding pseudomolecules for the 19 chromosomes (table S10).The assembled C n subgenome (525.8 Mb) is larger than the A n subgenome (314.2 Mb), consistent with the relative sizes of the assembled C o genome of B. oleracea (540 Mb, 85% of thẽ 630-Mb genome) and the A r genome of B. rapa (312 Mb, 59% of the~530-Mb genome) (9-11). The B. napus assembly contains 34.8% transposable elements (TEs), less than the 40% estimated from raw reads (table...

Background Chromatin provides a tunable platform for gene expression control. Besides the well-studied core nucleosome, H1 linker histones are abundant chromatin components with intrinsic potential to influence chromatin function. Well studied in animals, little is known about the evolution of H1 function in other eukaryotic lineages for instance plants. Notably, in the model plant Arabidopsis , while H1 is known to influence heterochromatin and DNA methylation, its contribution to transcription, molecular, and cytological chromatin organization remains elusive. Results We provide a multi-scale functional study of Arabidopsis linker histones. We show that H1-deficient plants are viable yet show phenotypes in seed dormancy, flowering time, lateral root, and stomata formation—complemented by either or both of the major variants. H1 depletion also impairs pluripotent callus formation. Fine-scale chromatin analyses combined with transcriptome and nucleosome profiling reveal distinct roles of H1 on hetero- and euchromatin: H1 is necessary to form heterochromatic domains yet dispensable for silencing of most transposable elements; H1 depletion affects nucleosome density distribution and mobility in euchromatin, spatial arrangement of nanodomains, histone acetylation, and methylation. These drastic changes affect moderately the transcription but reveal a subset of H1-sensitive genes. Conclusions H1 variants have a profound impact on the molecular and spatial (nuclear) chromatin organization in Arabidopsis with distinct roles in euchromatin and heterochromatin and a dual causality on gene expression. Phenotypical analyses further suggest the novel possibility that H1-mediated chromatin organization may contribute to the epigenetic control of developmental and cellular transitions. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s13059-019-1767-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Summary• To understand key mechanisms leading to stabilized allopolyploid species, we characterized the meiotic behaviour of wheat allohexaploids in relation to structural and genetic changes.• For that purpose, we analysed first generations of synthetic allohexaploids obtained through interspecific hybridization, followed by spontaneous chromosome doubling, between several genotypes of Triticum turgidum and Aegilops tauschii wheat species, donors of AB and D genomes, respectively.• As expected for these Ph1 (Pairing homoeologous 1) gene-carrying allopolyploids, chromosome pairing at metaphase I of meiosis essentially occurs between homologous chromosomes. However, the different synthetic allohexaploids exhibited progenitor-dependent meiotic irregularities, such as incomplete homologous pairing, resulting in univalent formation and leading to aneuploidy in the subsequent generation.• Stability of the synthetic allohexaploids was shown to depend on the considered genotypes of both AB and D genome progenitors, where few combinations compare to the natural wheat allohexaploid in terms of regularity of meiosis and euploidy. Aneuploidy represents the only structural change observed in these synthetic allohexaploids, as no apparent DNA sequence elimination or rearrangement was observed when analysing euploid plants with molecular markers, developed from expressed sequence tags (ESTs) as well as simple sequence repeat (SSR) and transposable element sequences.

Summary The present study aims to understand regulation of gene expression in synthetic and natural wheat (Triticum aestivum) allohexaploids, that combines the AB genome of Triticum turgidum and the D genome of Aegilops tauschii; and which we have recently characterized as genetically stable. We conducted a comprehensive genome‐wide analysis of gene expression that allowed characterization of the effect of variability of the D genome progenitor, the intergenerational stability as well as the comparison with natural wheat allohexaploid. We used the Affymetrix GeneChip Wheat Genome Array, on which 55 049 transcripts are represented. Additive expression was shown to represent the majority of expression regulation in the synthetic allohexaploids, where expression for more than c. 93% of transcripts was equal to the mid‐parent value measured from a mixture of parental RNA. This leaves c. 2000 (c. 7%) transcripts, in which expression was nonadditive. No global gene expression bias or dominance towards any of the progenitor genomes was observed whereas high intergenerational stability and low effect of the D genome progenitor variability were revealed. Our study suggests that gene expression regulation in wheat allohexaploids is established early upon allohexaploidization and highly conserved over generations, as demonstrated by the high similarity of expression with natural wheat allohexaploids.

The spatial organization of chromatin can be subject to extensive remodeling in plant somatic cells in response to developmental and environmental signals. However, the mechanisms controlling these dynamic changes and their functional impact on nuclear activity are poorly understood. Here, we determined that light perception triggers a switch between two different nuclear architectural schemes during Arabidopsis postembryonic development. Whereas progressive nucleus expansion and heterochromatin rearrangements in cotyledon cells are achieved similarly under light and dark conditions during germination, the later steps that lead to mature nuclear phenotypes are intimately associated with the photomorphogenic transition in an organ-specific manner. The light signaling integrators DE-ETIOLATED 1 and CONSTITUTIVE PHOTOMORPHOGENIC 1 maintain heterochromatin in a decondensed state in etiolated cotyledons. In contrast, under light conditions cryptochrome-mediated photoperception releases nuclear expansion and heterochromatin compaction within conspicuous chromocenters. For all tested loci, chromatin condensation during photomorphogenesis does not detectably rely on DNA methylation-based processes. Notwithstanding, the efficiency of transcriptional gene silencing may be impacted during the transition, as based on the reactivation of transposable element-driven reporter genes. Finally, we report that global engagement of RNA polymerase II in transcription is highly increased under light conditions, suggesting that cotyledon photomorphogenesis involves a transition from globally quiescent to more active transcriptional states. Given these findings, we propose that light-triggered changes in nuclear architecture underlie interplays between heterochromatin reorganization and transcriptional reprogramming associated with the establishment of photosynthesis. plant development | photomorphogenesis | light signaling | nuclear organization | heterochromatin C hromatin allows dense packaging of chromosomal DNA into a small and constrained nuclear space. It also serves as a structural framework for regulatory processes that control the functional status of genome domains with variable sizes, notably by dynamically influencing the subnuclear partitioning of generich and repeat-rich domains within euchromatic and heterochromatic regions, respectively (reviewed in refs. 1-3). These chromatin-based processes impact plasticity in the regulation of nuclear programs during both vegetative and reproductive phases of the plant life cycle (recently reviewed in refs. 4-8). In many cases, such events combine local chromatin variations with prominent changes in nuclear architecture and higher-order chromatin organization.Spatial chromatin organization is well exemplified by the extreme cases of transcriptionally silent chromocenters that contain the majority of ribosomal DNA repeats, such as the (peri)centromeric domains of mice and several plant species that include transposable elements (TE) and non-TE repeated sequences (9,

Summary The reprogramming of gene expression appears as the major trend in synthetic and natural allopolyploids where expression of an important proportion of genes was shown to deviate from that of the parents or the average of the parents. In this study, we analyzed gene expression changes in previously reported, highly stable synthetic wheat allohexaploids that combine the D genome of Aegilops tauschii and the AB genome extracted from the natural hexaploid wheat Triticum aestivum. A comprehensive genome‐wide analysis of transcriptional changes using the Affymetrix GeneChip Wheat Genome Array was conducted. Prevalence of gene expression additivity was observed where expression does not deviate from the average of the parents for 99.3% of 34 820 expressed transcripts. Moreover, nearly similar expression was observed (for 99.5% of genes) when comparing these synthetic and natural wheat allohexaploids. Such near‐complete additivity has never been reported for other allopolyploids and, more interestingly, for other synthetic wheat allohexaploids that differ from the ones studied here by having the natural tetraploid Triticum turgidum as the AB genome progenitor. Our study gave insights into the dynamics of additive gene expression in the highly stable wheat allohexaploids.

SUMMARYUsing floral-dip, tumorigenesis and root callus transformation assays of both germline and somatic cells, we present here results implicating the four major non-homologous and homologous recombination pathways in Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. All four single mutant lines showed similar mild reductions in transformability, but knocking out three of four pathways severely compromised Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. Although integration of T-DNA into the plant genome is severely compromised in the absence of known DNA double-strand break repair pathways, it does still occur, suggesting the existence of other pathways involved in T-DNA integration. Our results highlight the functional redundancy of the four major plant recombination pathways in transformation, and provide an explanation for the lack of strong effects observed in previous studies on the roles of plant recombination functions in transformation.

1Chromatin in eukaryotes provides a tunable platform to control gene expression and convey an 2 epigenetic memory throughout cell divisions. H1 linker histones are abundant components with an 3 intrinsic potential in influencing chromatin structure and function. We detail the impact of H1 depletion 4in Arabidopsis on fine-scale chromatin organization, transcription and development. While required for 5 chromocenter assembly, H1s are dispensable for transposable element (TE) silencing and peripheral 6 positioning of heterochromatin. In euchromatin, H1 regulates nucleosome density, mobility, and regular 7 distribution of nanoscale chromatin domains. While necessary to maintain epigenetic patterns, H1 only 8 moderately affects transcription. Its depletion is associated with failures in transitional fate changes 9 such as lateral root initiation, root hair production, stomata patterning but also flowering and dormancy 10 regulation. Therefore, Arabidopsis H1 variants are chromatin architects mediating nano-and microscale 11 levels-of-organization operating downstream of epigenetic and transcriptional establishment processes 12 and contribute to epigenetic reorientations in developmental transitions. 13