Purpose A peroneus longus tendon autograft is used in many orthopaedic procedures and it is biomechanically comparable to a hamstring tendon autograft. Despite its potential, there are few studies that have evaluated the use of the peroneus longus tendon in ACL reconstruction. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcome and donor site morbidity of ACL reconstruction with hamstring tendon autografts versus peroneus longus tendon autografts in patients with an isolated ACL injury. Methods Patients who underwent isolated single-bundle ACL reconstruction were allocated to two groups (hamstring and peroneus longus) and observed prospectively. Graft diameter was measured intraoperatively. Functional scores (IKDC, modiied Cincinnati and Lysholm scores) were recorded preoperatively and 1 year after surgery. Donor site morbidities were assessed with thigh circumference measurements and ankle scoring with the AOFAS and FADI. Results Fifty-two patients (hamstring n = 28, peroneus n = 24) met the inclusion criteria. The peroneus longus graft diameter (8.8 ± 0.7 mm) was signiicantly larger than the hamstring diameter (8.2 ± 0.8 mm) (p = 0.012). There were no signiicant diferences between the pre-and 1-year postoperative score between the hamstring and peroneus longus groups in the IKDC (n.s), modiied Cincinnati (n.s), and Lysholm (n.s). The mean for the AOFAS was 97.3 ± 4.2 and for the FADI 98 ± 3.4 in the peroneus longus group, with a signiicant decrease in thigh circumference in the hamstring group (p = 0.002). Conclusion Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with peroneus longus autografts produces a functional score (IKDC, modiied Cincinnati, Lysholm) comparable to that of hamstring autografts at a 1-year follow-up, with the advantages of larger graft diameter, less thigh hypotrophy and excellent ankle function based on AOFAS and FADI scores. Level of evidenceProspective cohort study, Level II. Abbreviations ACL Anterior cruciate ligament BPTB Bone-patellar tendon-bone MPFL Medial patellofemoral ligament IKDC International Knee Documentation Committee MCL Medial collateral ligament * Nicolaas C. Budhiparama

Background Anterior knee pain, which has a prevalence of 4% to 49% after TKA, may be a cause of patient dissatisfaction after TKA. To limit the occurrence of anterior knee pain, patellar denervation with electrocautery has been proposed. However, studies have disagreed as to the efficacy of this procedure. Questions/purposes We evaluated patients undergoing bilateral, simultaneous TKA procedures without patellar resurfacing to ask: (1) Does circumferential patellar cauterization decrease anterior knee pain (Kujala score) postoperatively compared with non-cauterization of the patella? (2) Does circumferential patellar cauterization result in better functional outcomes based on patient report (VAS score, Oxford knee score, and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score) than non-cauterization of the patella? (3) Is there any difference in the complication rate (infection, patellar maltracking, fracture, venous thromboembolism, or reoperation rate) between cauterized patellae and non-cauterized patellae? Methods Seventy-eight patients (156 knees) were included in this prospective, quasi-randomized study, with each patient serving as his or her own control. Patellar cauterization was always performed on the right knee during simultaneous, bilateral TKA. Five patients (6%) were lost to follow-up before the 2-year minimum follow-up interval. A single surgeon performed all TKAs using the same type of implant, and osteophyte excision was performed in all patellae, which were left unresurfaced. Patellar cauterization was performed at 2 mm to 3 mm deep and approximately 5 mm circumferentially away from the patellar rim. The preoperative femorotibial angle and degree of osteoarthritis (according to the Kellgren-Lawrence grading system) were measured. Restoration of the patellofemoral joint was assessed using the anterior condylar ratio. Clinical outcomes, consisting of clinician-reported outcomes (ROM and Kujala score) and patient-reported outcomes (VAS pain score, Oxford knee score, and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score), were evaluated preoperatively and at 1 month and 2 years postoperatively. Preoperatively, the radiologic severity of osteoarthritis, based on the Kellgren-Lawrence classification, was not different between the two groups, nor were the baseline pain and knee scores. The mean femorotibial angle of the two groups was also comparable: 189° ± 4.9° and 191° ± 6.3° preoperatively (p = 0.051) and 177° ± 2.9° and 178° ± 2.1° postoperatively (p = 0.751) for cauterized and non-cauterized knees, respectively. The preoperative (0.3 ± 0.06 versus 0.3 ± 0.07; p = 0.744) and postoperative (0.3 ± 0.06 versus 0.2 ± 0.07; p = 0.192) anterior condylar ratios were also not different between the cauterized and non-cauterized groups. Results At the 2-year follow-up interval, no difference was observed in the mean Kujala score (82 ± 2.9 and 83 ± 2.6 for cauterized and non-cauterized knees, respectively; mean difference 0.3; 95% confidence interval, -0.599 to 1.202; p = 0.509). The mean VAS pain score was 3 ± 0.9 in the cauterized knee and 3 ± 0.7 in the non-cauterized knee (p = 0.920). The mean ROM was 123° ± 10.8° in the cauterized knee and 123° ± 10.2° in the non-cauterized knee (p = 0.783). There was no difference between cauterized and non-cauterized patellae in the mean Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for symptoms (86 ± 4.5 versus 86 ± 3.9; p = 0.884), pain (86 ± 3.8 versus 86 ± 3.6; p = 0.905), activities (83 ± 3.2 versus 83 ± 2.8; p = 0.967), sports (42 ± 11.3 versus 43 ± 11.4; p = 0.942), and quality of life (83 ± 4.9 versus 83 ± 4.7; p = 0.916), as well as in the Oxford knee score (40 ± 2.1 versus 41 ± 1.9; p = 0.771). Complications were uncommon and there were no differences between the groups (one deep venous thromboembolism in the cauterized group and two in the control group; odds ratio 0.49, 95% CI, 0.04-5.56; p = 0.57). Conclusions Patellar cauterization results in no difference in anterior knee pain, functional outcomes, and complication rates compared with non-cauterization of the patella in patients who undergo non-resurfaced, simultaneous, bilateral, primary TKA with a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. We do not recommend circumferential patellar cauterization in non-resurfaced patellae in patients who undergo TKA. Level of Evidence Level II, therapeutic study.

Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate the anthropometric diferences between knees of Indonesian Asians and Dutch Caucasians and the it of nine diferent knee implant systems. Methods A total of 268 anteroposterior (AP) and lateral knee preoperative radiographs from 134 consecutive patients scheduled for total knee arthroplasty at two diferent centres in Jakarta and Leiden were included. Both patient groups were matched according to age and sex and included 67 Asians and 67 Caucasians. We assessed the radiographic diferences between the Asian and Caucasian anthropometric data. The dimensions of the nine knee implant designs (Vanguard, Genesis II, Persona Standard, Persona Narrow, GK Sphere, Gemini, Attune Standard, Attune Narrow, and Sigma PFC) were compared with the patients' anthropometric (distal femur and proximal tibia) measurements. ResultsThe Dutch Caucasian patients had larger mediolateral (ML) and AP femoral and tibial dimensions than the Indonesian Asians. The aspect ratios of the distal femur and tibia were larger in Asians than in Caucasians. The AP and ML dimensions were mismatched between the tibial components of the nine knee systems and the Asian anthropometric data. Both groups had larger ML distal femoral dimensions than the knee systems. Conclusion Absolute and relative diferences in knee dimensions exist not only between Asian and Caucasian knees but also within both groups. Not all TKA systems had a good it with the Asian and Caucasian knee phenotypes. An increase in the range of available knee component sizes would be beneicial, although TKA remains an adequate compromise. Level of evidence III.

Background Accelerometer-based navigation is a handheld navigation tool that was introduced to offer a simpler technique compared with more-cumbersome computer-assisted surgery (CAS). Considering the increasing number of adopters, it seems important to evaluate the potential clinical benefits of this technology compared with conventional TKA. Questions/purposes In this systematic review, we asked: (1) Is accelerometer-based navigation more accurate than conventional TKA? (2) Does accelerometer-based navigation provide better functional outcome than conventional TKA? (3) Does accelerometer-based navigation increase surgical time or decrease the risk of complications or reoperations compared with conventional TKA? Methods This systematic review included all comparative prospective and retrospective studies published in the MEDLINE/PubMed and Cochrane libraries over the last 10 years. Inclusion criteria were all studies in English that compared accelerometer-based navigation with conventional TKA. Eleven studies met these criteria with 621 knees in accelerometer-based navigation group and 677 knees in conventional TKA group. Results related to alignment, objective and subjective functional scores, duration of surgery, complications and reoperations were extracted and compared between accelerometer-based-navigation and conventional TKA. Methodological quality was assessed using Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) tool (for nonrandomized control trials) and Cochrane Risk of Bias (for randomized control trials (RCTs). All studies with fair or better quality were included. Four RCTs and six nonrandomized studies comparing accelerometer-based navigation to conventional TKA were found. Results Inconsistent evidence on mechanical axis alignment was found, with five of nine studies slightly favoring the accelerometer-based navigation group, and the other four showing no differences between the groups. Only two of eight studies favored accelerometer-based navigation in terms of tibial component alignment in the coronal plane; the other six found no between-group differences. Similarly, mixed results were found regarding other metrics related to component alignment; a minority of studies favored accelerometer-based navigation by a small margin, and most studies found no between-group differences. Only three studies evaluated functional outcome and none of them showed a difference in range of motion or patient-reported outcomes. Most studies, six of seven, found no between-group differences concerning surgical time; one study demonstrated a slight increase in time with accelerometer-based navigation. There were no between-group differences in terms of the risk of complications, which generally were uncommon in both groups, and no reoperations or revisions were reported in either group. Conclusions We found conflicting evidence about whether accelerometer-based navigation reduces the number of coronal-plane outliers or improves alignment to a clinically important degree, and we found no evidence that it improves patient-reported outcomes or reduces the risk of complications or reoperations. Accelerometer-based navigation may increase surgical time. The overall quality of the evidence was low, which suggested that any observed benefits were overestimated. Given the absence of higher-quality evidence demonstrating compelling benefits of this accelerometer-based navigation technology, it should not be widely adopted. Level of Evidence Level III, therapeutic study.

Purpose This study aimed to evaluate the diferences in clinical outcome and donor site morbidity between the Peroneus Longus Tendon (PLT) and Hamstring Tendon (HT) in single-bundle Posterior Cruciate Ligament (PCL) reconstruction. Methods Patients with an isolated PCL injury underwent single-bundle PCL reconstruction using consecutive sampling. Patients were allocated into two groups (PLT and HT) and prospectively observed. The tendon graft diameter was measured intraoperatively. Functional scores (IKDC, Lysholm, and modiied Cincinnati scores) were recorded preoperatively and 2 years postoperatively. The thigh circumference and functional score according to the Foot and Ankle Disability Index (FADI) and American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) were recorded to evaluate the morbidities in the ankle. Results Fifty-ive patients (hamstring n = 27, peroneus n = 28) met the inclusion criteria. The diameter of the PLT graft (8.2 ± 0.6 mm) was comparable to that of the HT graft (8.3 ± 0.5 mm). Both groups had excellent postoperative knee functional outcome scores. The mean AOFAS and FADI scores were excellent, with no diference in thigh circumference between the groups. Conclusion PLT is a good choice as a graft in PCL reconstruction at the 2-year follow-up, with minimal donor site morbidity. Level of evidence II.

Background: Positioning and fit of the knee prostheses in patients determines functional outcome. For that matter anthropometric differences between knee joints of patients, will affect function. Since most total knees implant systems are designed for caucasians, discrepancies in matching to Asian patients might exist, with consequently less optimal fit of the implant. The aim of this study was to evaluate differences in anthropometric dimensions between Caucasian and Asian knees of patients eligible for total knee arthroplasty. Materials and Methods: 134 patients were included for radiographic anthropometric measurements on distal femurs, proximal tibia and patellar dimension were measured of 67 Caucasian and 67 Asian patients. Patient groups were age and gender matched. All radiographs were obtained preoperatively prior to total knee arthroplasty at two different centers, Jakarta and Leiden. The radiographic measurements were widest anteroposterior (AP) and widest mediolateral (ML) dimensions, aspect ratio (ML/AP), patellar length and patellar tendon length, patellar tendon/patella ratio. Sizes of eight knee implant designs (Vanguard, Genesis II, Persona -standard and narrow-, GK Sphere, Gemini, Attune and Sigma PFC) were collected from manufactures brochures and compared to the anthropometric measurements. Chi-Square test, student t-test and Bayesian statistics were used to compare differences between the two populations. Results: The mean age of the Caucasian group was 68 ± 7.1 years and the Asian patients were 67 ± 7.8 years. Both groups included 14.9% males and 85.1% females. The Dutch patients had a height of 166cm (sd 8.1 cm) the Indonesian patients 156 cm (sd 8.0 cm), the Dutch being 6.4% taller. Preoperative deformities in the Asians was predominantly into varus, while the Dutch patients had a slight valgus alignment; 90% of the KL scores were grade 3 and 4, comparable in both groups. In AP and ML the Caucasian femur is larger than the Asian femur (male-AP 12%, female-AP 15%, male-ML 6%, female-ML 9%). The Caucasian tibia is larger in AP and ML dimensions compared to the Asian patient’s tibia. The ML/AP aspect ratios were significantly different (p<0.0001) between Asian and Caucasian patients, with the ML/AP aspect ratio of both the femur and the tibia being larger in Asian patients 1.4 (sd 0.10) compared to Caucasians 1.3 (sd 0.10) for the femur. As for the tibia the aspect ratio in Asian patients is 1.5 (sd 0.11); Caucasians 1.3 (0.11). The Asian patients have a relative patella baja compared to the Caucasians. Good matching to the tibial aspect ratios (ML/AP) of Dutch and Indonesian patients appeared to present to the eight knee systems but to only three knee systems matched well to the femoral aspect ratios (ML/AP). Conclusion: Absolute and relative differences of knee dimensions exist between Caucasian and Asian knees. Caucasian has larger AP and ML for both tibial and femoral but smaller in aspect ratio for both tibia and femur compared to Asian patients. With respect to the fit of the implant to the natural knee, total knee arthroplasty remains a compromise to nature

Purpose Interleukin-1 is the main proinflammatory cytokine in osteoarthritis (OA). Several single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) within the IL-1 gene cluster (IL-1β, IL-1R1, and IL-1RN) have been determined, but their associations with knee OA remain poorly understood. The present study aimed to identify the associations between IL-1 SNPs and knee osteoarthritis. Methods This meta-analysis and systematic review included all comparative studies published in the MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library databases. We performed a systematic search to identify relevant studies on the evaluation of the correlation between the IL-1 gene and knee OA published up to February 2020 that met the eligibility criteria. Nine studies on a total of 2256 knees with OA and 3527 healthy knees met the eligibility criteria. Results associated with IL-1A, IL-1B, IL-1R1, and IL-1RN SNPs were extracted and compared between knees with OA and healthy knees. Methodological quality was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa scale (NOS). All studies with fair or good quality were included. Results The meta-analysis showed that the risk of knee OA is decreased by the IL-1RN*1 and IL-1RN*1/*1 genotypes and increased by the IL-1RN*2 and I-L1RN*1/*2 genotypes. The systematic review revealed only two studies associating the IL-1RN allele, none associating the IL-1B polymorphism, and only one study associating IL-1A and IL-1R1 polymorphisms with knee OA. Conclusions Several IL-1RN alleles and genotypes play a role in knee OA but other genetic variations in the IL-1 region were still conflicting in its association with knee OA.

Background: With the increasing use of hamstring tendon as an autograft in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, some shortcomings have been found on the donor site. Therefore, an alternative autograft option with adequate strength and less donor site morbidity will be very valuable. Peroneus longus tendon has been found to be a promising option. Indication: Primary ACL reconstruction. Technique Description: Peroneus longus tendon graft is harvested with a longitudinal skin incision at 2 to 3 cm (2 finger-breadths) above and 1 cm (1 finger-breadth) behind the lateral malleolus, followed by superficial fascia incision in line with skin incision. The peroneus longus and peroneus brevis tendons were then identified. The tendon division location was marked at 2 to 3 cm above the level of the lateral malleolus. After that, an end-to-side suture was performed between the distal part of the peroneus longus tendon and peroneus brevis tendon. The peroneus longus tendon was stripped proximally with a tendon stripper to at least 5 cm from the fibular head to prevent peroneal nerve injury. Graft preparation was performed with a standard procedure to obtain the suitable graft size. In routine arthroscopic ACL reconstruction, peroneus longus tendon graft fixation can be performed with a cortical suspension device, bioabsorbable screws, or a combined technique. Results: Recent studies showed that peroneus longus autograft had a comparable outcome with hamstring tendon autograft in primary ACL reconstruction at a 1-year follow-up. The use of peroneus longus tendon autograft resulted in larger graft diameter and less thigh hypotrophy. The mean (±SD) for the AOFAS-Hindfoot Score in the peroneus longus group was 97.3 ± 4.2, while the mean FADI score was 98 ± 3.4, both of which were considered excellent results. Discussion/Conclusion: The use of peroneus longus autograft in primary ACL reconstruction is a safe procedure with an excellent outcome. Peroneus longus tendon autograft can be recommended as an alternative graft in single-bundle ACL reconstruction. Further study of the functional outcome and knee stability evaluation is recommended.