DRLs for CT part used in PET/CT examinations are limited. The aim was to execute the second phase of the national DRL for CT part of PET/CT imaging operating in KW, in support of optimisation and dose reduction as imaging technology is advancing. In this multicentre collaborative PET centers (No:8) audit, data collection was restricted to the adult oncology patients due to a limited number of the other studies and also due to the National MOH Ethical Committee recommendation. The CTDIvol, DLP and SL were recorded and the Median, Mean, SD, 75th, 25th percentiles as well as WB effective dose (ED) were calculated. Dose and scan length statistics for HB and WB scans (65% and 35% of total: 309) and the WB+HB presented together with the proposed NDRLs and the Achievable doses. Third quartile DLP (mGy x cm) and CTDIvol (mGy) values for the HB were (537, 5) which were higher than the UK NDRL (400, 4.3) but were lower than the Swiss NDRL (620, 6) and the France NDRL (762, 7.7). Comparatively, the Proposed NDRLs for (WB) were (684, 4.1) which were lower than Swiss National Data (720, 5.0). It is worth noted that, the Swiss had about 5000 (HB) & 706 (WB), the UK had 370 (HB) and France had 1000 (HB) entries. Calculated ED varied from 4.1 to 10.2 mSv, (mean values=6.9 mSv) for HB and from 2.6 to 7 mSv (mean value=4.6 mSv) for WB scans which were lower than the first phase (2018). Although, there was 9.1% improvement in NDRL, but the outcome suggested there is a continuous need for monitoring NDRL.
KEY WORDS: PET/CT, NDRL, CTDvol, DLP, Molecular Imaging
Many discrepancy in selection of proper filter and its parameters for individual cases exists. The authors investigate the impact of the most common filters on patient NM images with coronary artery disease (CAD), and compare the results with the computerized tomography (CT)-Angio and angiography for accuracy.The investigation initiated by performing various single photon emission computerized tomography (SPECT)/CT scan of the national electrical manufacturers association chest phantoms having hot and cold inserts. Data acquired on GE 670 PRO SPECT/CT; 360Ø, 64 frames, 60 seconds, low energy high resolution (LEHR) 128, low energy general purpose (LEGP) with CT attenuation (120 kV and 170 mA). The images reconstructed with filtered back projection and ITERATIVE ordered-subset expectation maximization utilizing filters; Hann, Butterworth, Metz, Hamming, and Wiener. The Image contrast was calculated to assess absolute nearness of the inserts. Based on the preliminary results, then scans of 92 patients with CAD; 64 males and 28 females, age 41 to 77 years old, who had been reported earlier reprocessed with the nominated filter and were reported by 2 NM expert. The results compared to the earlier reports and to the CT–Angio and angiography.The optimization suggested 3 filters; Wiener (Wi), Metz and Butterworth (But) provide the highest contrast (99– 66.4%) and (81– 32%) for the cold and hot inserts respectively, with the (Wi) filter to be the better option. The reprocessed patients scan with the (Wi) presented an elevated diagnostic accuracy, correlated well with the CT-Angio and angiography results (P < .001 and r = 0.79 for [Wi] and P = .004 and r = 0.39 for [But]). The percentage of the false negative for moderate to severe CAD cases reported using Wi filter reduced from 27% to 7% and similarly for mild CAD cases from 7% to 1%.It appears the Wiener filter could produce results with the highest contrast for phantom imaging of various cold and hot spheres and for the patient data which is more consistent with angiography results, with much-elevated accuracy in intermediate cases (r = 0.79 for Wiener and r = 0.39 for Butterworth vs angiography). However, the optimum parameters obtained for the filters have no relation with the resolution of the imaging system, but the details of the objects could be improved.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.