No abstract

The present study shows that the CXCR4/SDF-1 axis regulates the migration of second branchial archderived muscles as well as non-somitic neck muscles. Cxcr4 is expressed by skeletal muscle progenitor cells in the second branchial arch (BA2). Muscles derived from the second branchial arch, but not from the first, fail to form in Cxcr4 mutants at embryonic days E13.5 and E14.5. Cxcr4 is also required for the development of non-somitic neck muscles. in Cxcr4 mutants, non-somitic neck muscle development is severely perturbed. In vivo experiments in chicken by means of loss-of-function approach based on the application of beads loaded with the CXCR4 inhibitor AMD3100 into the cranial paraxial mesoderm resulted in decreased expression of Tbx1 in the BA2. Furthermore, disrupting this chemokine signal at a later stage by implanting these beads into the BA2 caused a reduction in MyoR, Myf5 and MyoD expression. In contrast, gain-of-function experiments based on the implantation of SDF-1 beads into BA2 resulted in an attraction of myogenic progenitor cells, which was reflected in an expansion of the expression domain of these myogenic markers towards the SDF-1 source. Thus, Cxcr4 is required for the formation of the BA2 derived muscles and non-somitic neck muscles.In vertebrates, trunk muscles originate from the somites, whereas most of the head muscles originate from the cranial paraxial mesoderm (CPM) 1,2 . Neck muscle progenitor cells are found in the transition zone between somite and CPM 3,4 . The CPM cells transiently migrate laterally into the region of the branchial arches and contributes to the muscles of the head 5,6 . These muscles can be divided into branchial, extra-ocular (EOM), axial and laryngoglossal muscles 2 . BAs are made of surface ectoderm, endoderm, myogenic mesodermal cells and neural crest cells (NCCs) 7 . The BA1 mesoderm contributes to formation of mastication muscles. The BA2 mesoderm gives rise to facial expression muscles 8 . Skeletal muscle progenitor cells in the more caudal BAs (3rd, 4th and 6th) are thought to contribute to neck muscles, for example the trapezius and sternocleidomastoideus, or its birds homologue the cucullaris muscle 3,4 . Clonal analysis reports that trapezius and sternocleidomastoid neck muscles are formed from non-somitic progenitor cells, whereas splenius muscle and laryngeal muscles have a dual origin (somitic and non-somitic) of the progenitor cells 3,4 . The genetic regulation of craniofacial myogenesis remains to be fully elucidated 5,8-10 .The signaling cascades that control pre-myogenic progenitor cell specification act distinctly in the head and trunk muscles 1,8 . Several pre-myogenic genes that are required to initiate myogenesis and maintain cells in an immature state in the trunk are known. Pax3, Pax7 and Lbx1 are crucial in specifying pre-myogenic progenitor cells in the dermomyotomes, the parts of the somites that gives rise to trunk and limb myoblasts 8,11 . The expression of Pax3 and Pax7 in somites is normally downregulated before activation of Myogenin...

Trunk and head muscles originate from distinct embryonic regions: while the trunk muscles derive from the paraxial mesoderm that becomes segmented into somites, the majority of head muscles develops from the unsegmented cranial paraxial mesoderm. Differences in the molecular control of trunk versus head and neck muscles have been discovered about 25 years ago; interestingly, differences in satellite cell subpopulations were also described more recently. Specifically, the satellite cells of the facial expression muscles share properties with heart muscle. In adult vertebrates, neck muscles span the transition zone between head and trunk. Mastication and facial expression muscles derive from the mesodermal progenitor cells that are located in the first and second branchial arches, respectively. The cucullaris muscle (non-somitic neck muscle) originates from the posterior-most branchial arches. Like other subclasses within the chemokines and chemokine receptors, CXCR4 and SDF-1 play essential roles in the migration of cells within a number of various tissues during development. CXCR4 as receptor together with its ligand SDF-1 have mainly been described to regulate the migration of the trunk muscle progenitor cells. This review first underlines our recent understanding of the development of the facial expression (second arch-derived) muscles, focusing on new insights into the migration event and how this embryonic process is different from the development of mastication (first arch-derived) muscles. Other muscles associated with the head, such as non-somitic neck muscles derived from muscle progenitor cells located in the posterior branchial arches, are also in the focus of this review. Implications on human muscle dystrophies affecting the muscles of face and neck are also discussed.

Cell migration plays a crucial role in early embryonic development. The chemokine receptor CXCR4 has been reported to guide migration of neural crest cells (NCCs) to form the dorsal root ganglia (DRG) and sympathetic ganglia (SG). CXCR4 also plays an important part during the formation of limb and cloacal muscles. NCCs migration and muscle formation during embryonic development are usually considered separately, although both cell lineages migrate in close neighbourhood and have markers in common. In this study, we present a new method for the simultaneous detection of CXCR4, mesodermal markers and NCCs markers during chicken embryo developmental stages HH18–HH25 by combining double whole-mount in situ hybridization (ISH) and immunostaining on floating vibratome sections. The simultaneous detection of CXCR4 and markers for the mesodermal and neural crest cells in multiple labelling allowed us to compare complex gene expression patterns and it could be easily used for a wide range of gene expression pattern analyses of other chicken embryonic tissues. All steps of the procedure, including the preparation of probes and embryos, prehybridization, hybridization, visualization of the double labelled transcripts and immunostaining, are described in detail.

No abstract

In the past, the heart muscle was thought to originate from a single source of myocardial progenitor cells. More recently, however, an additional source of myocardial progenitors has been revealed to be the second heart field, and chicken embryos were important for establishing this concept. However, there have been few studies in chicken on how this field contributes to heart muscles in vitro. We have developed an ex vivo experimental system from chicken embryos between stages HH17–20 to investigate how mesodermal progenitors in the second branchial arch (BA2) differentiate into cardiac muscles. Using this method, we presented evidence that the progenitor cells within the BA2 arch differentiated into beating cardiomyocytes in vitro. The beating explant cells were positive for cardiac actin, Nkx2.5, and ventricular myosin heavy chain. In addition, we performed a time course for the expression of second heart field markers (Isl1 and Nkx2.5) in the BA2 from stage HH16 to stage HH21 using in situ hybridization. Accordingly, using EGFP-based cell labeling techniques and quail-chicken cell injection, we demonstrated that mesodermal cells from the BA2 contributed to the outflow tract and ventricular myocardium in vivo. Thus, our findings highlight the cardiogenic potential of chicken BA2 mesodermal cells in vitro and in vivo.

A prerequisite for discovering the properties and therapeutic potential of branchiomeric muscles is an understanding of their fate determination, pattering and differentiation. Although the expression of differentiation markers such as myosin heavy chain (MyHC) during trunk myogenesis has been more intensively studied, little is known about its expression in the developing branchiomeric muscle anlagen. To shed light on this, we traced the onset of MyHC expression in the facial and neck muscle anlagen by using the whole-mount in situ hybridization between embryonic days E9.5 and E15.5 in the mouse. Unlike trunk muscle, the facial and neck muscle anlagen express MyHC at late stages. Within the branchiomeric muscles, our results showed variation in the emergence of MyHC expression. MyHC was first detected in the first arch-derived muscle anlagen, while its expression in the second arch-derived muscle and non-somitic neck muscle began at a later time point. Additionally, we show that non-ectomesenchymal neural crest invasion of the second branchial arch is delayed compared with that of the first brachial arch in chicken embryos. Thus, our findings reflect the timing underlying branchiomeric muscle differentiation.

No abstract