Membranes consisting of phospholipid bilayers are an essential constituent of eukaryotic cells and their compartments. The alteration of their composition, structure, and morphology plays an important role in modulating physiological processes, such as transport of molecules, cell migration, or signaling, but it can also lead to lethal effects. The three main classes of membrane‐active peptides that are responsible for inducing such alterations are cell‐penetrating peptides (CPPs), antimicrobial peptides (AMPs), and fusion peptides (FPs). These peptides are able to interact with lipid bilayers in highly specific and tightly regulated manners. They can either penetrate the membrane, inducing nondestructive, transient alterations, or disrupt, permeabilize, or translocate through it, or induce membrane fusion by generating attractive forces between two bilayers. Because of these properties, membrane‐active peptides have attracted the attention of the pharmaceutical industry, and naturally occurring bioactive structures have been used as a platform for synthetic modification and the development of artificial analogs with optimized therapeutic properties to transport biologically active cargos or serve as novel antimicrobial agents. In this review, we focus on synthetic membrane interacting peptides with bioactivity comparable with their natural counterparts and describe their mechanism of action.

Peptide‐protein interactions (PPIs) are facilitated by the well‐defined three‐dimensional structure of bioactive peptides, interesting compounds for the development of new therapeutic agents. Their secondary structure and thus their propensity to engage in PPIs can be influenced by the introduction of peptide staples on the side chains. In particular, light‐controlled staples based on azobenzene photoswitches and their structural influence on helical peptides have been studied extensively. In contrast, photolabile staples bearing photocages as a structural key motif, have mainly been used to block supramolecular interactions. Their influence on the secondary structure of the target peptide is under‐investigated. Thus, in this study we use a combination of spectroscopic techniques and in silico simulations to systematically study a series of helical peptides with varying length of the photo‐labile staple to obtain a detailed insight into the structure‐property relationship in such photoresponsive biomolecules.