BackgroundThere has been an increase in the use of fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) for the diagnosis of parathyroid lesions (PLs). Differentiation between a thyroid lesion and a PL is not easy because of their similar features. We reviewed parathyroid aspirates in our institution and aimed to uncover trends in diagnostic criteria.MethodsWe selected 25 parathyroid aspirates (from 6 men and 19 women) confirmed surgically or immunohistochemically from 2006 to 2011.ResultsMajor architectural findings of PLs include scattered naked nuclei, loose clusters, a papillary pattern with a fibrovascular core, tight clusters, and a follicular pattern. These architectures were commonly admixed with one another. Cytological features included anisokaryosis, stippled chromatin, a well-defined cell border, and oxyphilic cytoplasm. Eighteen of the 25 patients were diagnosed with PL using FNAC. Seven patients had been misdiagnosed with atypical cells (n=2), benign follicular cells (n=2), adenomatous goiter (n=2) and metastatic carcinoma (n=1) in FNAC. Using clinicoradiologic data, the sensitivity of the cytological diagnosis was 86.7%. The cytological sensitivity decreased to 50% without this information.ConclusionsFNAC of PL is easily confused with thyroid lesions. A combination of cytological parameters and clinical data will be required to improve the diagnostic sensitivity of PLs.

TILs evaluations following the IWG recommendations may not be useful for predicting survival outcomes in patients with early TNBC. J. Surg. Oncol. 2016;114:17-21. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Objective: This study evaluated the performance of a flow cytometry system (LC-1000) in screening cervical precancerous lesions at routine health checkups. Study design: In total, 928 health examinees were enrolled at 16 health promotion centers in 13 Korean cities between 2016 and 2017. All participants underwent liquid-based cervical cytology and flow cytometry testing to determine the cell proliferation index (CPIx). Results: The positivity rate of the LC-1000 system increased with the severity of the cervical cytology findings (p for trend < 0.001). When low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) or higher (including LSIL, high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion [HSIL], and atypical squamous cells without excluding HSIL [ASC-H]) was defined as gold-standard positivity, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of LC-1000 were 75.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 66.8–83.7), 58.5% (95% CI, 55.2–61.9), 18.1% (95% CI, 14.5–21.8), and 95.1% [95% CI, 93.2–97.0], respectively. The median CPIx increased significantly from normal cytology to HSIL (p < 0.001). The median CPIx was higher in high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV)-positive cases than in HR-HPV-negative cases (0.23 vs. 0.17, p < 0.001), while it did not differ between HR-HPV-positive and HR-HPV-negative cases with normal cytology findings (0.16 vs. 0.16, p = 0.700). Conclusion: The LC-1000 system is potentially useful for screening cervical precancer and cancer, especially when excluding normal or ASC of undetermined significance cases in routinely screened populations.