Implementation of high strength steels in welded structural designs in the automotive, defence and construction industries is constantly increasing. Prolonged usage of such structures requires deep understanding of welded joint fatigue as well as a reliable and feasible life estimation methods development. Conventional fatigue testing methods often require costly, expensive in maintenance, high loading capacity equipment. They are also commonly restricted to specific specimen geometry and are time consuming due to the limit of a single specimen per test setup. This work presents high cycle fatigue (HCF) testing of high strength MARS 600 welded steel using a quick, simple and efficient resonance fatigue testing (RFT) method. The specimen is a simple cantilever fillet welded to a base plate using austenitic stainless steel 307L consumable electrode. Electrodynamic shaker is used for harmonic base excitation at a constant operating frequency. Several specimens welded to the common base are tested simultaneously, allowing completion of a high number of cycles and statistics in a relatively short time period. A hybrid, practical research approach combining experimental, finite element analysis (FEA), numerical and analytical calculations is presented. Fracture mechanics approach for fatigue life assessment is implemented. Crack growth calculation is based on the Paris - Erdogan law. Reduction in structural integrity due to crack propagation causes a reduction in natural frequency and transmissibility. The change in gain is evaluated via the open crack FEA model and integrated into the crack propagation algorithm. Resonance search, track and dwell module (RSTD) for maintaining constant gain throughout the test is not required. Fatigue life Wohler (SN) curve is constructed. Standard weld fatigue data is often provided for direct loading (tensile stress) and for different stress ratio (R) values. Corrections for mean stress and loading application are required. Current fully reversed (R = -1), indirect loading (bending stress) test results may be readily applied for random vibration fatigue analyses post processing. As expected, actual fatigue life results are higher compared to standard design curves, implying correctness of the manufacturing welding process of examined specimens. The presented procedure is of interest for research as well as for industrial welding processes testing, optimization and qualification.
Low Cycle Fatigue (LCF) is a prominent failure mechanism in many design components; therefore, an evaluation of cycles to failure in this regime is of high importance. Most international standards recommend a closed loop strain-controlled mode specimen testing in this regime. However, the ꜪN data obtained from this test is not suitable for life evaluation of parts enduring force-controlled history during actual service without correction for control mode. Many existing procedures, which accounts for cyclic strain stabilization during force-controlled loading may significantly complicate the finite elements analysis (FEA) at solving or post processing stages and are often an inherent source of uncertainty. A heuristic, cost effective and sufficiently accurate approach for LCF life estimation is advocated. The method involves only two force loading FEA simulations, one of the actual parts and the other of the test specimen, using initial unstabilized stress strain curve, followed by a limited number of force-controlled specimens testing. Actual part and specimen life correlation performed using first loading unstabilized equivalent plastic strain value Ꜫp1 under locality and similitude assumptions. Unstabilized strain vs. number of cycles to failure curve Ꜫp1N is constructed and discussion regarding specimen geometry considerations for providing sufficient accuracy is included. Method validation and crack propagation study are provided.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.