Introduction. This study was performed to assess the applicability of the WHO Maternal Near Miss Tool (MNM Tool) and the organ dysfunction criteria in a high-income country. Material and methods. The MNM tool was applied to 2552 women who died of pregnancy-related causes or sustained severe acute maternal morbidity between August 2004 and August 2006 in one of the 98 hospitals with a maternity unit in the Netherlands. Fourteen (0.6%) cases had insufficient data for application. Each case was assessed according to the three main "MNM categories" specified in the MNM tool and their subcategory criteria: five disease-, four intervention-and seven organ dysfunction-based criteria. Potentially life-threatening conditions (disease-based inclusions) and lifethreatening cases (organ dysfunction-based inclusions) were differentiated according to WHO methodology. Outcomes were incidence of all (sub)categories and case-fatality rates. Results. Of the 2538 cases, 2308 (90.9%) women fulfilled disease-based, 2116 (83.4%) intervention-based and 1024 (40.3%) organ dysfunction-based criteria. Maternal death occurred in 48 women, of whom 23 (47.9%) fulfilled disease-based, 33 (68.8%) intervention-based and 31 (64.6%) organ dysfunction-based criteria. Case-fatality rates were 23/2308 (1.0%) for cases fulfilling the disease-based criteria, 33/2116 (1.6%) for intervention-based criteria and 31/1024 (3.0%) for women fulfilling the organ dysfunction-based criteria. Conclusions. In the Netherlands, where advanced laboratory and clinical monitoring are available, organ dysfunction-based criteria of the MNM tool failed to identify nearly two-thirds of sustained severe acute maternal morbidity cases and more than one-third of maternal deaths. Disease-based criteria remain important, and using only organ dysfunctionbased criteria would lead to underestimating severe acute maternal morbidity.

BackgroundWHO proposed the WHO Maternal Near Miss (MNM) tool, classifying women according to several (potentially) life-threatening conditions, to monitor and improve quality of obstetric care. The objective of this study is to analyse merged data of one high- and two low-resource settings where this tool was applied and test whether the tool may be suitable for comparing severe maternal outcome (SMO) between these settings.MethodsUsing three cohort studies that included SMO cases, during two-year time frames in the Netherlands, Tanzania and Malawi we reassessed all SMO cases (as defined by the original studies) with the WHO MNM tool (five disease-, four intervention- and seven organ dysfunction-based criteria). Main outcome measures were prevalence of MNM criteria and case fatality rates (CFR).ResultsA total of 3172 women were studied; 2538 (80.0%) from the Netherlands, 248 (7.8%) from Tanzania and 386 (12.2%) from Malawi. Total SMO detection was 2767 (87.2%) for disease-based criteria, 2504 (78.9%) for intervention-based criteria and 1211 (38.2%) for organ dysfunction-based criteria. Including every woman who received ≥1 unit of blood in low-resource settings as life-threatening, as defined by organ dysfunction criteria, led to more equally distributed populations. In one third of all Dutch and Malawian maternal death cases, organ dysfunction criteria could not be identified from medical records.ConclusionsApplying solely organ dysfunction-based criteria may lead to underreporting of SMO. Therefore, a tool based on defining MNM only upon establishing organ failure is of limited use for comparing settings with varying resources. In low-resource settings, lowering the threshold of transfused units of blood leads to a higher detection rate of MNM. We recommend refined disease-based criteria, accompanied by a limited set of intervention- and organ dysfunction-based criteria to set a measure of severity.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12884-017-1370-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.