Background Chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) body washes and emollient application may modulate bacterial pathogen colonization and prevent neonatal hospital-acquired infections. Methods This pilot, non-randomized, open-label trial, enrolled preterm neonates (1000-1500g; day 1-3 of life) at a tertiary hospital in Cape Town, South Africa. Participants were sequentially allocated to 4 trial arms (n=20 each): 1% aqueous CHG (CHG), 1% CHG plus emollient (CHG+EM), emollient only (EM) and standard of care (SOC: no antiseptic/emollient). Trial treatment/s were applied daily for 10 days (d) post-enrolment, documenting neonatal skin condition score. Anterior nose, neck, umbilical and perianal swabs for bacterial culture were collected at d1, d3, d10 and d16 post-enrolment, (±1 day), reporting pathogen acquisition rates and semi-quantitative bacterial colony counts. (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03896893; trial status: closed). Findings Eighty preterm neonates (mean gestational age 30 weeks [SD 2]) were enrolled between 4 March and 26 August 2019. The bacterial pathogen acquisition rate (comparing d1 and d16 swabs) varied from 33·9% [95%CI 22·9-47·0] at the umbilicus, 39·3% [95%CI 27·6-52·4] at the neck, to 71·4% [95%CI 58·5-81·7] at both the nose and perianal region. At d10, CHG babies had reduced bacterial density detected from neck, umbilicus, and perianal swabs compared to other groups (see Table 3). Following intervention cessation, colonization density was similar across all trial arms, but S. aureus colonization was more prevalent among EM and CHG+EM babies. Neonatal skin condition score improved in babies receiving emollient application (EM: -0·87 [95%CI 0·69-1·06] and CHG+EM: -0·73 [0·45-0·99]), compared to the SOC and CHG arms (Table 2); no CHG-related skin reactions occurred. Interpretation Bacterial colonization density was significantly reduced in babies receiving 1% CHG washes but colonization levels rebounded rapidly post-intervention. Emollient application improved skin condition but was associated with higher rates of S. aureus colonization. Funding South African Medical Research Council; National Institutes of Health (TW010682).
Background: Colistin is increasingly prescribed for neonates with carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) infections.Objectives: We described patient demographics, infection episodes, treatment and clinical outcomes, colistin related adverse events and relatedness of isolates in neonates with clinically confirmed or clinically suspected CRE infections.Method: The authors retrospectively reviewed culture-confirmed and clinically suspected culture-negative CRE infections at a South African neonatal unit during a CRE outbreak.Results: Fifty-three neonates (median gestational age 29 weeks and birth weight 1185 g) were included. Twenty-three of 53 neonates (43%) had culture-confirmed CRE (17 received colistin; 6 died without receiving colistin) and 30 (57%) received colistin for clinically suspected CRE infection but were ultimately culture-negative. Prior respiratory support and surgical conditions were present in 37/53 (70%) and 19/53 (36%) neonates, respectively. Crude mortality was high (20/53; 38%) with no significant difference between culture-confirmed CRE versus clinically suspected culture-negative CRE groups (10/23 [44%] vs 10/30 [33%]; p = 0.45). Hypomagnesaemia (10/38; 26%) and hypokalaemia (15/38; 40%) were frequent; acute kidney injury was rare (1/44; 2%). Three CRE infection clusters were identified by genotypic analysis of 20 available isolates (18 [90%] blaNDM-1 [New Delhi metallo-beta-lactamase], 2 [10%] blaOXA [oxacillinase]-48).Conclusion: Neonates receiving colistin therapy were predominantly preterm, with multiple risk factors for infection. Colistin-associated electrolyte derangement was frequent. Over one-third of neonates died. BlaNDM-1 was the most frequent carbapenemase gene identified in the outbreak isolates.Contribution: Colistin was safely used during an Enterobacterales outbreak in predominantly premature and surgical neonates. The mortality was high.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.