The photoinitiated and cerium(III)-catalyzed aqueous reaction between sulfite ion and oxygen has been studied in a diode-array spectrophotometer using the same light beam for excitation and detection. Cerium(III) is identified as the photoactive absorbing species, and the production of cerium(IV) initiates a radical chain reaction. To interpret all the experimental findings, a simple scheme is proposed, in which the additional chain carriers are sulfite ion radical (SO3(-.)), sulfate ion radical (SO4(-.), and peroxomonosulfate ion radical (SO5(-.). The overall rate of oxidation is proportional to the square root of the light intensity per unit volume, which is readily interpreted by the second-order termination reaction of the proposed scheme. It is also shown that the reaction proceeds for an extended period of time in the dark following illumination, and a quantitative analysis is presented for this phase as well. The postulated model predicts that cerium(III) should have a cocatalytic or synergistic effect on the autoxidation of sulfite ion in the presence of other catalysts. This prediction was confirmed in the iron(III)-sulfite ion-oxygen system. The experimental method and the mathematical treatment used might be applicable to a wide range of photoinduced chain reactions.

The photochemical autoxidation of aqueous, acidic sulfur(IV) solutions was studied in the absence and presence of iron(II) by a newly introduced technique using a diode-array spectrophotometer, in which the same light source is used to drive and detect the reaction. Based on detailed kinetic and stoichiometric data sets, a non-chain mechanism is proposed for the autoxidation of sulfur(IV). In this mechanism, excited hydrated sulfur dioxide, *H2O.SO2, first reacts with O2 to form peroxomonosulfate ion, HSO5-, which rapidly oxidizes another H2O.SO2 to give hydrogensulfate ion as a final product. In the presence of iron(II), the formation of iron(III) was detected, which can be interpreted through the simultaneous contribution of two additional pathways: some of the HSO5- formed oxidizes iron(II) instead of sulfur(iv), and *H2O.SO2 also reacts directly with iron(II) to yield iron(III). This mechanism provides a sufficient quantitative interpretation of all experimental observations.

The kinetics and mechanism of the photoinitiated and iodide ion-catalyzed aqueous autoxidation of sulfur(IV) has been studied in a diode-array spectrophotometer using the same light beam for excitation and detection. Light absorption of both the iodide ion and sulfur(IV) contribute to the initiation of a highly efficient radical chain reaction, the overall rate of which depends on the reactant and catalyst concentrations, the pH, and the light intensity in a complex manner. To interpret all the experimental findings, an elaborate scheme is proposed, in which the chain carriers are SO3-*, SO4-*, SO5-*, I*, and I2-*. There are three termination steps, each of them is second-order with respect to the chain carriers. Model calculations and nonlinear fitting have been used to show that the proposed scheme gives an excellent quantitative interpretation of the experimental results.

The kinetics and mechanism of the ligand substitution reaction between Fe(2)(OH)(2)(4+) and periodate ion has been studied. This process is unique among the reactions of the iron(iii) hydroxo dimer because the initial rate is second-order with respect to Fe(2)(OH)(2)(4+). The formation of a bi- and a tetranuclear complex, Fe(2)(OH)(2)(H(4)IO(6))(3+) and Fe(4)(OH)(4)(H(4)IO(6))(7+), is proposed. Comprehensive fitting of the kinetic data was used to show that the proposed model, which is very similar to earlier models used with other inorganic oxoanions, gives a reasonable interpretation of all observations. It is shown that the lifetime of Fe(2)(OH)(2)(H(4)IO(6))(3+) is relatively long and it can open a pathway to form oligomeric and less soluble products at higher initial concentrations. The speciation of aqueous periodate ion solution was also studied and it is proposed that the tetrahedral form, IO(4)(-), is less dominant over the octahedral form, H(4)IO(6)(-), than previously thought.