When walking on an uneven surface or complex terrain, humans tend to gaze downward. This behaviour is usually interpreted as an attempt to acquire useful information to guide locomotion. Visual information, however, is not used exclusively for guiding locomotion; it is also useful for postural control. Both locomotive and postural control have been shown to be sensitive to the visual flow arising from the respective motion of the individual and the three-dimensional environment. This flow changes when a person gazes downward and may present information that is more appropriate for postural control. To investigate whether downward gazing can be used for postural control, rather than exclusively for guiding locomotion, we quantified the dynamics of standing and walking posture in healthy adults, under several visual conditions. Through these experiments we were able to demonstrate that gazing downward, just a few steps ahead, resulted in a steadier standing and walking posture. These experiments indicate that gazing downward may serve more than one purpose and provide sufficient evidence of the possible interplay between the visual information used for guiding locomotion and that used for postural control. These findings contribute to our understanding of the control mechanism/s underlying gait and posture and have possible clinical implications.

Downward gazing is often observed when walking requires guidance. This gaze behavior is thought to promote walking stability through anticipatory stepping control. This study is part of an ongoing effort to investigate whether downward gazing also serves to enhance postural control, which can promote walking stability through a feedback/reactive mechanism. Since gaze behavior alone gives no indication as to what information is gathered and the functions it serves, we aimed to investigate the cognitive demands associated with downward gazing, as they are likely to differ between anticipatory and feedback use of visual input. To do so, we used a novel methodology to compromise walking stability in a manner that could not be resolved through modulation of stepping. Then, using interference methodology and neuroimaging, we tested for (1) interference related to dual tasking, and (2) changes in prefrontal activity. The novel methodology resulted in an increase in the time spent looking at the walking surface. Further, while some dual-task interference was observed, indicating that this gaze behavior is cognitively demanding, several gaze parameters pertaining to downward gazing and prefrontal activity correlated. These correlations revealed that a greater tendency to gaze onto the walking surface was associated with lower PFC activity, as is expected when sensory information is used through highly automatic, and useful, neural circuitry. These results, while not conclusive, do suggest that gazing onto the walking surface can be used for purposes other than anticipatory stepping control, bearing important motor-control and clinical implications.

When walking on an uneven surface or complex terrain, humans tend to gaze downward.Previous investigations indicate that visual information can be used for online control of stepping. Behavioral investigations suggest that, during walking, the availability of visual information increases stepping accuracy, but probably through a feedforward control mechanism. Consequently, downward gazing (DWG) is usually interpreted as a strategy used to acquire useful information for online and/or feedforward control of stepping.Visual information is not exclusively used for guiding locomotion; a wealth of literature has been published on the usefulness of visual information for feedback postural control. Critically, postural control has been shown to be sensitive to the visual flow arising from the respective motion of the individual and the 3D environment.To investigate whether DWG can be used to enhance feedback control of posture, rather than feedforward/online control of gait, we conducted a series of experiments that explore this possible interplay. Through these experiments we were able to show that DWG, just a few steps ahead, results in a steadier standing and walking posture, without the need for accuracy. Moreover, we were able to demonstrate that humans resort to DWG when walking stability is compromised, even when destabilizing features were visually unpredictable.This series of experiments provides sufficient evidence of the possible interplay between visual information used for guiding locomotion and that used for postural control. Moreover, this evidence raises concerns regarding the way we interpret gaze behavior without the knowledge of the type and use of the information gathered.