Background
Immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is highly effective in microsatellite instability–high (MSI‐H) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC); however, specific predictive biomarkers are lacking.
Patients and Methods
Data and samples from 85 patients with MSI‐H mCRC treated with ICIs were gathered. Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and tumor mutational burden (TMB) were analyzed in an exploratory cohort of “super” responders and “clearly” refractory patients; TILs were then evaluated in the whole cohort of patients. Primary objectives were the correlation between the number of TILs and TMB and their role as biomarkers of ICI efficacy. Main endpoints included response rate (RR), progression‐free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).
Results
In the exploratory cohort, an increasing number of TILs correlated to higher TMB (Pearson's test, p = .0429). In the whole cohort, median number of TILs was 3.6 in responders compared with 1.8 in nonresponders (Mann‐Whitney test, p = .0448). RR was 70.6% in patients with high number of TILs (TILs‐H) compared with 42.9% in patients with low number of TILs (odds ratio = 3.20, p = .0291). Survival outcomes differed significantly in favor of TILs‐H (PFS: hazard ratio [HR] = 0.42, p = .0278; OS: HR = 0.41, p = .0463).
Conclusion
A significant correlation between higher TMB and increased number of TILs was shown. A significantly higher activity and better PFS and OS with ICI in MSI‐H mCRC were reported in cases with high number of TILs, thus supporting further studies of TIL count as predictive biomarker of ICI efficacy.
Implications for Practice
Microsatellite instability is the result of mismatch repair protein deficiency, caused by germline mutations or somatic modifications in mismatch repair genes. In metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), immunotherapy (with immune checkpoint inhibitors [ICIs]) demonstrated remarkable clinical benefit in microsatellite instability–high (MSI‐H) patients. ICI primary resistance has been observed in approximately 25% of patients with MSI‐H mCRC, underlining the need for predictive biomarkers. In this study, tumor mutational burden (TMB) and tumor infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) analyses were performed in an exploratory cohort of patients with MSI‐H mCRC treated with ICIs, demonstrating a significant correlation between higher TMB and increased number of TILs. Results also demonstrated a significant correlation between high number of TILs and clinical responses and survival benefit in a large data set of patients with MSI‐H mCRC treated with ICI. TMB and TILs could represent predictive biomarkers of ICI efficacy in MSI‐H mCRC and should be incorporated in future trials testing checkpoint inhibitors in colorectal cancer.
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a complex and molecularly heterogeneous disease representing one of the most frequent causes of cancer-related death worldwide. About 8-15% of CRCs harbor a mutation in BRAF gene, a proto-oncogene involved in cell proliferation, differentiation and survival through the MAPK signaling cascade. The acquisition of BRAF mutation is an early event in the "serrated" CRC carcinogenetic pathway and is associated with specific and aggressive clinico-pathological and molecular features. Despite that the presence of BRAF mutation is a well-recognized negative prognostic biomarker in metastatic CRC (mCRC), a great heterogeneity in survival outcome characterizes these patients, due to the complex, and still not completely fully elucidated, interactions between the clinical, genetic and epigenetic landscape of BRAF mutations. Because of the great aggressiveness of BRAF-mutated mCRCs, only 60% of patients can receive a second-line chemotherapy; so intensive combined and tailored first-line approach could be a potentially effective strategy, but to minimize the selective pressure of resistant clones and to reduce side effects, a better stratification of patients bearing BRAF mutations is needed.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.